Lindsay Lohan Avoids Jail For Failing Her Alcohol Test

No Punishment, No Surprise

Earlier today we learned that Lindsay Lohan was ordered to appear in court to face the judge after she reportedly failed at least one of two alcohol tests while under house arrest. TMZ is now reporting that Lindsay will face no punishment at all for this latest infraction. Apparently, Lindsay was only required to be tested in the months of January and February, which means she was essentially free to drink as much as she liked in the months since. Lohan will be forced to serve out the rest of her house arrest without having any parties … so that is how the court is choosing to punish her.

Lindsay Lohan will not go to jail,because Judge Stephanie Sautner ruled the prior judge — Elden Fox — only required controlled substances testing from January 3 – February 25, 2011. Judge Sautner said Lindsay is now restricted for the remainder of her house arrest to one friend at a time at her Venice loft, in addition to family members. And, the judge said NO PARTIES at Lindsay’s crib. Judge Sautner said the only thing Lindsay was guilty of was “extremely poor judgment.” Judge Sautner asked Lindsay if she wanted to get on with her life. Lindsay replied, “Yes I do.”

LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! Lindsay gets off again. Who’s surprised?

[Photo credit: Splash News; Source]

Share:
| Posted under:
pink-is-the-new-blog
  1. Jesse

    Who cares? Emma Frost took her acting spot a few years ago minus the drama…

  2. BJ

    I think she is an asshole for sure, however, considering the jails are seriously overflowing, and California is seriously broke, what good would it do to put her in jail and waste money the government doesn’t have?

  3. Nate

    Gets off again? “Judge Stephanie Sautner ruled the prior judge — Elden Fox — only required controlled substances testing from January 3 – February 25, 2011.” THAT MEANS SHE WAS INNOCENT!

  4. Missy

    As much as it pains me to defend her…if she wasn’t required to be sober, then she didn’t violate anything. And, if she didn’t violate anything, then there’s nothing for her to “get away with” in this case.

    • truthyisalways

      Good point. But she made a point of talking about her “alcohol free home” in an interview, which confirms she is still lying, and also that she felt there was some point and value in giving the impression she wasn’t drinking. Which means she understood that she needs to show signs of rehabilitation, and improved self-control. With a substance monitor strapped to her, a probation officer recording her progress, she was no doubt aware that there were some very good reasons to abstain from drinking.

      As many readers here do, I maintain that she’s got massive mental health issues. That worsen every time she gets away with something else.

    • Alex

      I remember from months ago the judge didn’t require her to wear a SCRAM under her house arrest. Her ankle monitor is to make sure she doesn’t leave the property. A la ‘Disturbia’

  5. At this point she could kill someone on the front steps of a courthouse and get away with it.

  6. Just like all the other celebrities… It is so pathetic that the world is that delusional that people with a certain profession and certain amount of money be treated differently. Frankly, she hasn’t been in a good movie since 95′( and thats only if you are a little kid and think her early movies were good), so she should have the same treatment as everyone else. The only reason she has even stayed in the celebrity news is because she is such a fuck-up.

  7. matt

    Here in australia shes a joke no one has any respect we are just over her crap! Stick her in and throw away the key!!

  8. gayana

    Trent, you’re suppose to be delivering the celebrity NEWS!
    this is NO NEWS.. same shit different day

  9. Girl

    i’m not surprised.surprisingly.

Leave A Comment