Last week we got our first look at Robert Pattinson on the cover of the 10th Anniversary issue of Details magazine and today we get to see a couple more previously unseen photos from that shoot:
Details just published a new batch of photos from this photoshoot helmed by photographer Norma Jean Roy. After the jump, check out one more new NSFW photo of R. Pattz posing with those topless models again …
Pattinson famously announced that he does not like vaginas in his coverstory interview but he never said anything about boobies … so these new booby photos should be A-OK with him ;) Click HERE to see a slideshow of this new batch of photos from this Details magazine shoot … you might find something that you like.
[Photo credit: Norma Jean Roy; Source]
I think he meant he’s allergic to vagina’s as in when he sees them, he gets an erection, so therefore he’s allergic to them. I know a lot of people were saying he was gay and what not. He’s just weird.
@CHASE — LOL!! An erection as a result of being near a vagina is not an “allergic reaction” LOLOLOL!!!
@Trent – Yes, I know an erection near a vagina is not an allergic reaction, silly goose. I mean it as in when straight guys see vagina’s, they get turned on and you know, get an erection. So therefore he’s saying he’s just “allergic” to vagina’s because it gives him an erection because he was around naked women all day. Because he said he’s “allergic to vaginas” and uh, yeah. I’m trying to explain it but I’m lame chips at the moment.
@CHASE — Aww, yer not lame chips ;) xo
i think he is gay….i really do
hes never gunna live that comment down. im pretty sure it was taken wayyyyyyyyyyyy out of context.
anyways – i actually really like this photoshoot. its one of his better ones
yeah, i’ve heard a guy say that too. he’s allergic to it because it makes him “swell”
Love this man! Love this photoshoot!
He’s just so pretty to look at… I’ll just choose to ignore that whole ‘allergic to vaginas’ thing. :)
This photo is Barf. I loves me some Rpatz, but seriously?
K seriously what is the necessity of having nake models in these photos? It’s completely pointless and doesn’t make sense to me.
When I saw the first photo I thought “Oh, Rob is going to be on SNL.”