Robert Pattinson Gets Immortalized In Wax

In London and NYC

Earlier this month we learned that Robert Pattinson would be immortalized in wax at Madame Tussaud’s Wax Museum and today we get to see what his Twilightness looks like as a wax statue. Here is our first look at R. Pattz‘s wax statue at the Madame Tussaud’s Wax Museum in London, England which was unveiled earlier today:

A ROBERT Pattinson waxwork has been unveiled. The Remember Me actor has become the latest star to be immortalized with a lookalike at London’s Madame Tussauds, and some of his fans were invited to a VIP unveiling to meet the imitation Thursday morning. “The figure looks really great!” said one R-Patz fan. “Just like him — his hair is spot on. It’s amazing, almost like meeting the real thing! I’m sure people are going to love it; he is just gorgeous.” The waxwork has the trademark messy hair and narrow-eyed expression of the real Robert, and museum organizers are in no doubts that he will quickly become one of their hottest attractions. “Pattinson is one of the hottest celebs on the planet,” said Madame Tussauds spokesperson Liz Edwards. “We are delighted to be able to give them the chance to cosy up with their idol here at Madame Tussauds and judging by the reactions of the first to meet him here this morning he is set to top our “most kissed list of celebrities very quickly!” Robert’s waxwork took four months to make and cost $300,000.

BUT … there’s more!! Another Robert Pattinson waxwork was unveiled today as well, this time at the Madame Tussaud’s Wax Museuem in NYC, NY. And, in all honesty, I think the NYC statue looks much better than the London statue does. Check it out, after the jump …

Fans descended upon the wax figure of Twilight’s vampire heartthrob Robert Pattinson the famous Madame Tussauds’s New York museum unveiled on Thursday, while another statue is also in place at the group’s London branch. “The studios team recreated R-Pattz’s trademark sultry expression and messy hair, and his outfit will reflect his rugged style with an open collared shirt and skinny trousers,” said Madam Tussauds, which has replicated the likes of Michael Jackson, Angelina Jolie and scores of other high-profile celebrities. It takes about four months to mold and paint a wax statue, which costs about $220,000, Madame Tussauds said.

I really like the NYC statue better … which one do YOU prefer? And (if you can keep it clean), what would YOU like to do with these statues?

[Photo credit: Wireimage; Source, Source]

Share:
| Posted under: ,
pink-is-the-new-blog
  1. Katie

    I don’t think either look JUST like him. The London is the worst- his face is too skinny and angular.
    There is something off with the NYC one- can’t put my finger on it… but it’s better than London’s.

    I’ll take the real thing any day =p

  2. Madsme

    NYC one is much better – the London one has huge bags and shadows under his eyes…not so sexy.

  3. g

    Well I think his neck on the London one is too long and skinny. The first picture of the NYC on looked like Wolverine to me at first. It is fun that they did this…but the girls swarming even a wax figure creeps me out.

  4. sarah

    robert pattinson is my guilt pleasure, but this is creepy to me.

  5. Monique

    The problem with both of htese are that is eyes are way too closed. He looks like Clint Eastwood with those eyes.

  6. Monique

    G- i agree theres something totally wrong with that neck in the first one… and the stupid smile makes him like David Beckham. blah. i hate it.

  7. Isabella

    I think that while they used to make some really cool wax celebs, I think they’re slacking. A friend just went to NYC, and MOST of the more current statues looked terrible. The older ones were much better representations!

    But if I had to pick one – NYC looks “better”, though I really think the only thing either got right was the hair.

  8. malbo

    I like the NYC one better, but just think of how many germs are going to be crawling all over both of the statues after all those girls that will be kissing them! Blek!

  9. matty

    i agree neither are good…NYC better but still off….can they try again?

  10. Viola

    I think they’re both hotter than the real deal! Ha!

  11. Heather B.

    They are both pretty damn decent compared with some of the others I’ve seen.

  12. Brittany

    The one from London looks like R. Pattz’s face on Joseph Gordon-Levitt’s body

  13. nicole

    the NYC one is better for sure. i swear they’ve given up on putting effort into these things. they never look right anymore…i mean i know they cant look JUST like him, but i mean…come on…

  14. Nikki

    @ Viola – AGREED! :) London is too thin for RP. It actually looks a lot like Joseph Gordon-Levitt. While NYC is much closer to the real deal, it looks like Stephen Moyer!!

  15. N

    His hair is right. But his eyes and lips seem wrong in the first one. His eyes sort of have an Eddie Cibrian thing going on.

  16. love

    i can’t tell the difference :P

  17. Manda

    Wow, the England one looks nothing like him.

  18. Laura

    i think if they took the upper half of the face from the london one and then the lower part of the face and body from the NYC one it might look more like Rpattz.

  19. nat

    Back in the day, wasn’t making wax figures a time intensive process that included multiple photographs from different angles and extensive measuring resulting in a spitting image of the person? Madame Tussauds is slacking big time!

  20. New York nailed it. It’s so realistic it looks just like him.

  21. I don’t like either one! The only thing they got right is the hair!

  22. Haley

    Terrible squared

  23. Luv Ya

    Can Not BELIEVE people care enough about these statues to critique them. All I can say is, slap a wick on them and they’ll make interesting party candles in a few years.

  24. CHASE

    Maybe if Robert lost 15-20 lbs it would look like him.

  25. whotheheckami

    What do you expect for only $300,00? ;)

  26. whotheheckami

    oops! 300,000

  27. krib

    why is he cross-eyed?

  28. Lisa

    Ok, I feel like the hair from the London one is the best, and the face from the NYC one is the best, BUT, the face would be a lot better if his eyes weren’t so squinted

  29. jessica

    looks like a werewolf!

  30. Tiffany

    Hands down, NY wins!

  31. Portia

    what does it say about someone’s personal hygiene that their wax statues look cleaner than them?

  32. I think he looks like Chace Crawford in the first one.

  33. I agree neither looks just like him! I didn’t think the London one really looked that much like him at all to be honest!!I know someone worked really hard on these figure thou so they are very nice.Imagine having 1 of these in your home hehehe!~!

  34. Kristen

    Um the first one totally looks like Chase Crawford! Not Madame T’s best work

  35. jessica s

    i think they both look horrible.
    his eyes are too squinty. i feel like thats the only thing that wrecks it all. i don’t think i would be too excited to see that wax figure anyway.

  36. robin

    The first one resembles Leo dicaprio a bit. NYC FTW!!

  37. Lauren

    The London one looks like Leo Dicaprio and Robert Patz’s underfed love child.

  38. Wow, a wax Robert…now I guess he’s a legitimate celebrity!

  39. Viri

    Ik think the wax ones look hotter then the real one!! so they are way off hahaha

  40. This thing doesn’t look like him…

  41. Maggie

    Rob has a glow to his skin and a twinkle in his eye that simply can’t be replicated in wax. And they are too skinny, dressed too well, and the hair is too clean. If it was wearing a ripped flannel and a beanie and had a smile on its face, I might buy that it’s Rob.

    When is the Kristen one coming out? THAT I want to see. Her aura would be hard to replicate in wax as well. So much of her looks are in her eyes. Get them wrong, and you don’t get her.

  42. Mari

    The NY looks better but i don’t really like either. How ever Ill take the real thing any day. As what i would do hmm……… well let say i can really say it on here.

  43. Fuzzy

    Its the smile… They should really not have the smile… He should look all sulky and serious.

  44. I prefer the NYC one, but I’m with Kristen. I thought the figure looked more like Chace Crawford. The eyes do anyway.

  45. Chivonne

    Wax versions of him = hotter than live version. just sayin’

  46. Kim

    Agreeing with some of the previous posts, it looks like the top of Chase Crawford’s head (eyes and forehead) combined with the bottom part of not quite Robert Pattinson’s face.

  47. Nat

    Urgh, they’re both too skinny and squinty!

  48. vic

    The eyes are off in both, however i think the second pic of the london one looks the best.. the NYC one looks like a pedophile to me haha.

Leave A Comment