Last night the principal stars of Sherlock Holmes — Robert Downey, Jr., Jude Law and Rachel McAdams — were joined by the film’s director, Guy Ritchie, for the world premiere of the film at Empire Leicester Square in London, England last night. While the stars glittered and gleamed on the red carpet, reviews of the film were slowly making themselves known … to mixed results. Here are a few photos from the red carpet arrivals last night and some deets about those mixed reviews:

“Sherlock Holmes,” the latest film incarnation of the quintessentially English detective, drew a mixed reaction from London critics on Tuesday who variously described it as a roaring success and a hack job. London hosted the world premiere late on Monday of director Guy Ritchie’s movie starring Robert Downey, Junior as Holmes and Jude Law as his sidekick Doctor Watson, though the excitement of the event was not quite matched by the newspaper reviews. The Times praised the performances of the two main leads, saying Downey was “terrific” and praising Ritchie for drawing “a career-best performance from Law” — but said their double act failed to carry “an overlong film”. The Guardian was more blunt, saying Downey played Holmes “with boggle-eyed hamminess… a cartoon with darting eyes rather than a brain” and Law was just “blank” in this “high-end hack work”. It accused Ritchie of being in a “muddle” over what he was trying to achieve, saying he airbrushed out Holmes’ drug use and failed in his attempt to update the lead characters’ relationship and that of Watson and his fiancee. Ritchie insisted he had a clear vision, telling a press conference on Monday he had been a fan of Arthur Conan Doyle’s fictional detective since childhood “so I had a really strong vision of who Sherlock Holmes should be”. Many reviewers loved the film, however, including The Sun’s showbusiness correspondent who described it as a “roaring success”. Downey was “an exceptional Sherlock, who’s a clinical bare-knuckle fighter, hell-raising drinker and charmer”, he wrote, adding that Law was surprisingly convincing as a hardman. The Daily Telegraph described it as “undeniably a rollicking romp, an all-action blockbuster” led by a youthful Holmes that resembles a young Keith Richards, the Rolling Stones guitarist. “The pace rarely slackens throughout, the set pieces are explosive, the score relentlessly thunderous. Victorian London is recreated — relying on copious use of computer effects — with an eye for the grimy reality,” it said. The film’s producer, Joel Silver, who also worked with Ritchie on his previous movie “RocknRolla”, told reporters on Monday that Holmes was a “man of action” and they wanted to have fun with the main characters. “We invested ourselves in trying to make a contemporary movie that feels fresh and original but still embraces what Conan Doyle did. And I hope we succeeded,” he said. The film is released in the United States on December 25.
My guess is that the most negative reviews will come from ardent fans of the literary version of Sherlock Holmes and no movie will ever be able to live up to Sir Arthur Conan Doyle‘s work … particularly if it was directed by Madonna‘s ex-husband. Look, books are one thing movies are another … never the twain shall meet. It is very rare that a movie can live up to the expectation of a good book but it does happen sometimes … but even then, the book will always be superior. The Sherlock Holmes character is rich for movie-making fun and I have every confidence that Robert Downey, Jr. will do a great job bringing the character to life. I’m not worried … even if it’s not the best movie of the year, I have no doubt that Sherlock Holmes will be very entertaining. I can’t wait to see it!
Oh and Jude, lose the dandy babushka around your neck, please!
[Photo credit: Bauer-Griffin; Source]





























I can’t think of many, but Brokeback Mountain comes to mind as a movie that was better than the book.
@Cristin — ‘Brokeback Mountain’ was a short story.
I think New Moon the movie was much better than New Moon the book ;)
RDJ’s hat is WAY better than that other one he was wearing! Everyone looked great, minus Jude Law’s pretty scarf..I can’t wait to see this! I’m even tempted to abandon the fam on Christmas Day and check it out!
But I do agree with you about every other adaptation :)
I agree. The book is always better than the movie. I loved Flowers in the Attic the movie but the book blew it out of the water. The list goes on and on. Harry Potter movies are fantastic but the books are so superior! I can’t wait to see this movie! LOL…I didn’t even know Brokeback was a short story:)
@strunkette – That’s not saying much..Both were pretty horrible.. ;)
Maybe that was the problem with Brokeback Mountain… that it was a short story and not a book. I never got the same feeling of love that is in the movie. Maybe those feelings didn’t have enough time to develop in the short story.
For me, the Lord of the Rings books are classics, and luckily Peter Jackson did an AMAZING job on the movies. You can’t really compare the books vs. the movies, they’re just both excellent for what they are.
I think The Notebook movie was a thousand times better than the book, I absolutely couldn’t stand the book. Umm… and Tuck Everlasting, I think the movie pwnt the book. But those are the only two instances I can actually think of. It doesn’t happen very often, but when it does happen, it’s like the best shock ever :P
Looking forward to seeing this one.
does anyone remember the 80′s movie “Young Sherlock Holmes?” I loved that movie when i was a kid!
I think Jude Law looks cute in his little scarf!
Yeah, it’s hard to make a movie based off a book but sometimes people lose the complete direction and feel of the book when they’re making a movie. I know not everything can be similar but it should be a rule that you should base the movie as close to the book as possible. After all, most of the people who go to see a movie based off a book are the one’s who have read the book. That’s not always the case but still. This movie looks a little bit boring but I think I might see it just for curiosity
Uh..I actually like Guy Ritchie as a director. But yeah, I’m not gonna see this movie expecting it to be as good as the book. Will watch it just to be entertained. :)
-meream
I’m a big Sherlock Holmes fan and I can’t wait to see this movie!
Re: the book vs. movie debate, it’s all about managing your expectations. Like you said, Trent, the movie is rarely as good as the book. The one exception I can think of off the top of my head is The Perfect Storm. I thought the movie was just as good as the book, and that’s saying a lot since I really thought the book was great.
I am a HUGE Sherlock fan–love the books and adore the series with Jeremy Brett. I cannot WAIT to see this movie!! It opens while we are visiting family in the UK and I can’t decide if I want to see it there or over here.
And what “book” is this supposed to be based upon? I thought it was more of an imagined Holmes story rather than based on one particular story. ?
I wish they had just scrapped the idea of Sherlock Holmes and freed Guy Ritchie to do a film on his own terms. It doesn’t sound anything close to Sherlock Holmes so why associate a naked RDJ with a great literary character? I think people have a right to get pissed about that even though I usually argue the fact that books and movies stand on their own. And to add to the idea that some movies are better than the book: Legally Blonde was waaay better as a movie than a book.
Ugh, that pic of Jude Law is just another reason he makes my skin crawl. His icky chest hair showing and that stupid scarf tied around his scrawny neck.
On the flip side, RDJ looks gorgeous and Rachel McAdams in that dress is completely sylish and beautiful!
RDJ really knows how to rock a suit.