Comments on: NASA Scientists Report That They Found Water On The Moon

By: Isabelle

Isabelle — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:59:35 +0000

1. Pluto will always be a plante to me
2. The sun is indeed, a star
3. The moon IS a satellite

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_satellite if you don’t believe

By: It's Trent, Bitch!

It's Trent, Bitch! — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:05:23 +0000

@robin — The brontosaurus is the one that comes to mind, it used to “exist” and no longer does.

By: robin

robin — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 00:35:45 +0000

hey trent…i’m curious…which dinosaurs are you referring too??

chivonne..the moon is not a planet…its a moon… moons revolve around planets, planets revolve around the sun.

By: Laurel Kornfeld

Laurel Kornfeld — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 22:35:46 +0000

Pluto is still a planet. Only four percent of the IAU voted on the controversial demotion, and most are not planetary scientists. Their decision was immediately opposed in a formal petition by hundreds of professional astronomers led by Dr. Alan Stern, Principal Investigator of NASA’s New Horizons mission to Pluto. These astronomers prefer a broader planet definition that includes any non-self-luminous spheroidal body orbiting a star. Pluto is large enough to be rounded by its own gravity, and it orbits the sun; therefore, it is a planet.

By: steve muck

steve muck — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:30:46 +0000

IT WAS AN INDIA PROBE THAT FOUND IT EARLIER THIS YEAR. GO AND LOOK. NASA WERE EMBARRASSED TO LOSE ANOTHER FIRST.
GOOGLE TOOK FUNDS FROM NASA FUNDING LOBBYISTS KEEN TO RESURRECT MOON MISSIONS TO LIE.
GOOGLE HAVE A REPUTATION OF REWRITING HISTORY.
GOOGLE ARE PROPAGANDA SCUM.

By: Stephen

Stephen — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:08:20 +0000

Great news. Really interested that they can find water on Moon

By: Future SciTech » Blog Archive » ‘Significant Amount’ of Water Found on Moon

Sat, 14 Nov 2009 06:14:59 +0000

[...] NASA Scientists Report That They Found Water On The Moon (pinkisthenewblog.com) [...]

By: Amanda

Amanda — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:18:39 +0000

I’ve chosen to ignore all the changes made to science in the past few years. If I learned it in the 3rd grade, it’s still true. Long live the Brontosaurus and Pluto!

Anyway, this is still a pretty cool discovery. I can’t even begin to fathom what other things we’ll learn as technology advances.

By: PixiesBassline

PixiesBassline — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:31:21 +0000

@Val 2.0- “rocket surgeon” – LOL!!!!!

By: PixiesBassline

PixiesBassline — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:30:05 +0000

I find it slightly humorous and slightly strange that we know more of what’s floating in space than we do of what’s in the deepest depths of our own planet’s oceans…

By: Val 2.0

Val 2.0 — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:29:00 +0000

Chivonne – I’m not a rocket surgeon, but I’m pretty sure the sun is a star.

By: brittany

brittany — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:20:55 +0000

It’s things like this that mak me realize how much we don’t know about our solar system. Let’s pump more money into NASA’s pockets and see what else we can discover!

By: It's Trent, Bitch!

It's Trent, Bitch! — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:12:18 +0000

@Jenn — It’s all a sham!

By: Jenn

Jenn — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:11:17 +0000

I hate to break it to you, but there were a total of 9 lunar landing missions and only one was not successful. That means there were 8 lunar missions in which landed on the moon and returned, not just the first one in 1969. Therefore, if NASA sends a mission to land and moon-walk to explore this new discovery, it will be the 10th mission, and possibly the 9th to be successful.

http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/pla.....pollo.html

By: krissy

krissy — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:44:29 +0000

Oooooh, good point Meghan!

By: Chivonne

Chivonne — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:19:47 +0000

Sorry but the moon is a planet. Plain and simple k? At least in my head it it. Either they are planets, stars, or the sun. There are only three options!!
And I wanna see a picture of this water! I wonder if it’s clear or maybe like a fun color like purple. OH maybe it is cheese flavored!!!

By: FK

FK — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:12:45 +0000

Wow! Thanks for sharing. That’s amazing!

By: Meghan

Meghan — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:45:00 +0000

@Mr. Gyllenhaal–I think the moon is classified as a natural satelite.

By: Amanda

Amanda — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:35:24 +0000

This goes along the same lines of Pluto not being considered a planet any longer.

They need to stop printing textbooks and put everything in an electronic format since they rewrite history and science so often.

By: Val 2.0

Val 2.0 — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:34:54 +0000

Mr. Gyllenhaal – Celestial body?
x

By: krissy

krissy — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:31:20 +0000

“It’s so funny to think that the science we were taught in grade school can change so dramatically as new discoveries are made.” So true! I am still rocked by Pluto’s demotion from planet status!

By: Meghan

Meghan — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:31:12 +0000

Where there’s water, there’s life….

By: Mr. Gyllenhaal

Mr. Gyllenhaal — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:24:21 +0000

PS I know the moon isn’t a planet but I don’t know if there is a proper word for it so I am sorry to all who I offended with my ignorance:)!!

By: Mr. Gyllenhaal

Mr. Gyllenhaal — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:23:42 +0000

I thought it was awesome when I read this on CNN this morning. I mean, it is pretty cool. Hey, if any planet deserves to be blogged about it would be the Moon!!