Comments on: Britney Spears Retains 50/50 Custody Of Her Children

By: Jennie

Jennie — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:18:05 +0000

@j i belive the courts determine child support based on ones income and that is why he gets that amount.

By: J

Sat, 26 Sep 2009 03:09:25 +0000

ALSO… just cause Brit is FILTHY RICH! Why does it mean that K-Fat should get something 20K a MONTH!
—
I mean, there are plenty of families out there who can sometimes struggle to bring that in a year. I mean let Brit splash that out herself to gain more custody or for her own kids when she with them. But why should the courts make her splash that out just cause she has a lot of money! It’s kinda disgusting really…
—
The courts are clearly NOT thinking about the kids, just money! An avergae joe family don’t have to fork out 20K a month plus another 20K when one takes the kids out of the state for child support. IT’S TOTALLY WRONG NO MATTER WHO IT IS.. EVEN IF ITS BILL GATES!!!!

By: J

Sat, 26 Sep 2009 03:05:32 +0000

We all know he was in it for the money. I mean Shar Jackson knew that and she pretty much confirmed the fact that he only wants custody of BRITNEYS kids because of the money. She recently said something like, “K-Fat talks to them all the time on the phone and i gotta usually take the phone off them.”
—
Ahh hello, its called SEEING your kids. Not HEARING them you fat douche.
—
What sucks the most is, that when Brit does gain permanent 50/50 custody and not touring etc… she still has to pay his fat ass child support. I mean its 50/50 it shouldnt be like that. I dont exactly know what the rules are here in Aussie myself, but i sure as hell know it aint like THAT i dont think like it is in the US.
—
Fair enuf Brit is the money earner out of the two, but he should really be made by the court to work or find an income. I mean Brit shouldn’t be made to be paying for his living really. I just really want the day where Britney gains more custody than him. It may take a while, a year or two, but i can tell that day will come and then she won’t need to pay to feed his fat mouth no more.
—
Little does K-Fat know, Victoria Price or whatever that hoes name is, is doing what he did to Brit. They’ll get married in his backyard and then when Brits money stops rolling in, Vic is OUT with the cash! As much as funny that will be, its sad for the fact that Brit is also supplying this cash to an unknown white trash former stripper bitch like that Victoria hoe.

By: Chrissie

Chrissie — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 01:33:54 +0000

Trent, I think you’re being awfully kind to Ms. Britney. I’m so glad to see that she’s doing well, but truthfully, Kevin was there to take care of his kids when she jumped off the deep end. She put her kids in danger with her erratic behavior and even the Spears family has said that Kevin was a good father when Britney was emotionally unavailable to them. I trust the judge’s decision on this because Britney has come along way, but it’s going to take more than a few months of good behavior to erase the years of reckless behavior.

By: Krissy

Krissy — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:11:15 +0000

Trent, I just hope some ladies out there learn from her experience. If you love him enough to marry him after 2 months, there is no harm in waiting a little longer to make sure you still love him after 2 years!

By: Sarah

Sarah — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:05:40 +0000

I don’t care how much K-fed get’s and I hope Brit doesn’t either…… I would give my ex everything I owned if it meant seeing my kids….. however now that the custody is 50/50 it’s starting to seem like Brit has to pay K-fed moolah so she can spend time with her kids.

By: CHASE

CHASE — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:38:38 +0000

As much as I hate this situation, it’s fair. I mean, if Britney is willing to pay the money for her kids (which she obviously is) then there’s no problem. I really hate the fact he gets paid so much and doesn’t care about his other kids, though. It’s not really fair in some ways. I just feel bad for Britney because she has to do everything and she’s basically just a cash cow for her ex-husband, her family, team, and JIVE whom milk her out of everyone for cash. It’s quite sad.

By: It's Trent, Bitch!

It's Trent, Bitch! — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:00:46 +0000

@Krissy — “When you chose to marry someone very quickly and then procreate with them, this is what you open yourself up to.” So true, this was my first thought when they hooked up in the first place :(

By: Krissy

Krissy — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:52:40 +0000

He gets paid more if she takes them on tour, which does make sense. California divorce law can be a crazy thing, but there is NO REASON he should get fewer rights than women in this situation, just because he is a man. The law was set up to “protect” the pampered wives of the very rich…and now it is being used to protect the pampered husband of a rich woman. I don’t see how this situation is any less distasteful than the millions of other CA divorces where the rich parent has to pay out the wazoo to the other parent who doesn’t work. If it is good for the Sugar Daddy, it is good for the Sugar Mama. When you chose to marry someone very quickly and then procreate with them, this is what you open yourself up to.

By: Jaded

Jaded — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:31:57 +0000

I just don’t understand. If it’s child support how can her lawyers not force him to produce receipts that all that money is going solely to the care of the children. When my friend got divorced from her husband his attorneys made sure that the child support was only used for the children. The only thing she could use it for personally was for rent, and for car payments as both are needed to take care of the kids, and his lawyers forced her to produce receipts for the money spent every month. She has sole custody because he didn’t even want the children, but she has to put up with a huge pile of shit for the $1000 per month he gives her. I can’t believe Britney’s attorneys haven’t managed to make that bastard work for that money, because we can clearly see he doesn’t spend the money on the kids.
I see Britney with the kids all the time but never KFat, and I NEVER see him with his other children, how is he not an unfit parent?
Plus how is it possible that it takes $20K – $45K per month to take care of toddlers half the time?

By: Jadedkitten

Jadedkitten — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:12:42 +0000

LOL no worries Trent we’ll always agree on that always :)

By: It's Trent, Bitch!

It's Trent, Bitch! — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:07:34 +0000

@Jadedkitten — LOL! I didn’t say that you said that it did ;) I’m glad we agree he sucks ;)

By: Jadedkitten

Jadedkitten — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:03:28 +0000

LOl I didn’t say that it did and he does suck I’m just saying that him being a greedy douche works to her benefit in the short and long run. His greed has done nothing but help her custody case so it’s hard for me to get worked up about it. Plus I have this mental image of britney waving a fist full of cash in his face while slowly snatching the boys away from him “that’s right fattie look at the money look at the money.”

By: It's Trent, Bitch!

It's Trent, Bitch! — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:49:39 +0000

@Jadedkitten — Yes, Britney’s lawyers are amazing. It’s true that he likely could be leeching more from her but just cuz he’s “only” getting 45k a month doesn’t win him any points. He sucks.

By: Jadedkitten

Jadedkitten — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:49:12 +0000

*Files

By: Jadedkitten

Jadedkitten — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:46:38 +0000

Whatever him being a greedy douche has done nothing but help her get more custody of the kids and it’ll help her when she fills for 50/50 custody when the cons. ends. To be honest I don’t really get why ppl get worked up over 45k a month cause frankly that’s 1. temporary its goes back to only 20k at the end of her tour and 2. pocket change to Britney Spears she makes over a million dollars in 90 mins when you really think about it the douche bag “should” be getting more of her money score 1 for her lawyers.

By: Lizzy B.

Lizzy B. — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:44:39 +0000

i hate k-fed

By: It's Trent, Bitch!

It's Trent, Bitch! — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:12:44 +0000

@Maria — I don’t think he should get extra credit for being a parent when the other parent is incapacitated. He should be a good parent regardless. A good parent doesn’t milk the richer other parent for as much money as possible just so he can “care” for his children (while touring the world WITH his girlfriend) … and only the famous children … what about his other children? K-Fed is a scuzz in my opinion.

By: Maria

Maria — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:55:45 +0000

I really do not get all the hate for K-Fed. He really stepped up when the kids needed him. He seems to be a good dad. He could have gone after Britney way harder when she was at her lowest and he didn’t . Now that she seems to have settled down the shared custody is the right thing for the kids.

By: Sue.

Sue. — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:55:00 +0000

I don’t see how he needs $45,000 to take care of two kids 8not even full time) when everything else has already been paid for.

Unreal.

By: Kendra

Kendra — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:07:41 +0000

I can barely squeeze $400 out of my son’s deadbeat daddy and he’s getting over $20,000?? PLUS gets to travel and not pay for hotels?? Effing nuts..

By: mccraemalcolm

mccraemalcolm — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:04:26 +0000

I forgot to post the link. haha
http://blogs.myspace.com/index.....=511644601

By: mccraemalcolm

mccraemalcolm — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:56:40 +0000

@J it’s a demo that Myah Marie( Candy from a stranger) wrote for the Circus album, but her team denied it.

By: Nikki

Nikki — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:55:58 +0000

K-Fat continues to disgust me. Ick. Extra money because they’re out of state?? Plus room and board if he follows her on tour?? AND his $20,000 monthly support?!?! I feel like he’s taking advantage of her. Nothing bothers me more than seeing parents leverage their children.

By: Splacer

Splacer — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:39:48 +0000

Shouldn’t the child support payments have been adjusted to reflect that she has the kids MORE now – i.e. LESS money for K.Fed?