Comments on: Robert Pattinson Gets Studded & Wet For ‘Us Weekly’ Magazine

By: sheryl

sheryl — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 17:37:54 +0000

oh, lordy. he doesn’t look very sexy to me. i prefer him with some boyish charm, thanks very much. le sigh.

By: chelsea

chelsea — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:43:21 +0000

that is one bad photo i cant belive they did that to him

By: Brianna

Brianna — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:23:57 +0000

Rob is amazingly hot! <3 But seriously he is being way too over exposed!

By: Holly

Holly — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:52:25 +0000

i really just wanna boing his curls like dr reed did to dr cox in scrubs

By: Shazz

Shazz — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:23:16 +0000

I’m starting to dislike him.
not just because of those pics.
just.. in general.

By: CrystalH

CrystalH — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:33:44 +0000

looking amazing as usual!

By: azuresque

azuresque — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 16:18:23 +0000

I love me some R.Pattz, but really not feeling second photo. That’s a really bizarre facial expression

By: J

Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:37:44 +0000

Okay I don’t get the Robert Pattinson craze — he’s decent looking but I don’t find him hot or sexy. He just looks scruffy and unkempt to me and he’s a bit soft in the middle.

By: Janet

Janet — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:07:23 +0000

Vest pic gets thumbs down…wet pic gets two very enthusiastic thumbs up!

By: A

Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:03:40 +0000

Oh man, he’s just far too hot – I literally can’t take it.
I prefer him when he’s not Edward because I love a scruffy looking guy – the more he looks like all he does is sit around sipping JD and smoking the more I like him! Just my tastes!