Comments on: Michael Jackson’s Last Will & Testament Has Been Released

By: Sharran

Sharran — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 04:20:23 +0000

I’m with you chinabaybee..I say leave the man alone…he’s gone and left behind a WILL…stating what he wanted. I think they should abide by it . Like you said chinabaybee people are so quick to JUDGE…. What they should try to do is UNDERSTAND……..especially if they havent walked or in Michael Jacksons case moonwalked in his shoes. He left Debbie Rowe out for a reason and if seeing the video of her using such foul language doesnt convince you…GET A CLUE….. Besides ,she was paid off three times. Seriously , how many times do you have to pay someone off to get the point? Michael got it , thats why she was left out! For goodness sake.. let the man rest in PEACE. Sharran

By: B

Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:46:56 +0000

I think it is pretty shitty if Paul and Yoko don’t get those rights back.

By: chinabaybee

chinabaybee — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:00:16 +0000

Michaels children: Michael Joseph Jackson Jr., called Prince Michael I, Paris-Michael Katherine Jackson and Prince Michael Jackson II should be cared for by whomever he designated to care for them; which is his mother first and Diana Ross second. It just baffles me how everyone has an opinion about what should happen. No one really has any knowledge of anything that has happened in this man’s life. Only rumors, speculation etc. None of us are without our own baggage in some way or the other, but are quit to point the finger and criticize others. Quit gossiping about this man and his children for the sake of the children’s future and give them a chance at the most normal life they are able to have.

By: It's Trent, Bitch!

It's Trent, Bitch! — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 03:39:47 +0000

@erin — His first son is Prince Michael Joseph Jackson, his daughter is Paris Michael Katherine Jackson and his second son is Prince Michael Joseph Jackson, II

By: erin

erin — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 03:36:02 +0000

So wait, his oldest kid’s name is “Prince Michael Jackson, Jr.”? Umm, who is “Prince Michael Jackson, Sr.”?

By: kimmie

kimmie — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 03:04:50 +0000

debho Says:
July 1st, 2009 at 1:26 pm

I have a problem with Katherine gaining custody of those children. For a start, she’s elderly and surely has her share of health problems. Also, Joe Jackson still resides in the same house, so that would mean that he’d be around the kids. I don’t think Diana Ross should have them either…she’s not exactly young and also comes with some strange baggage.

Diana Ross doesn not have some strange baggage, doofball, and her children have turned out very well growing up in STRANGE CELEBRITY WORLD. You’re spastic.

By: Sarah

Sarah — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:43:35 +0000

Not really surprised that Debbie Rowe doesnt get anything. She wasnt involved in the kids lives or anything just a source of genes. I hope Joe Jackson stays the hell away from his grandkids and that his mother keeps it that way.

By: wishinchick

wishinchick — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:55:07 +0000

@Melissa I have seen that movie too many times to count! Yeah, I believe the Katherine and Joe are legally married but have been living apart for years. That movie made it clear that Katherine and Michael were pretty close.

Side note- that is one of the best tv movies ever made IMHO

By: taylor

taylor — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:43:19 +0000

I read that Katherine and Joe have separate homes and have been estranged for years. They’re still married, but living separate lives- at least that is what I read in one article, but with the Jacksons who really knows!

I agree that outbidding Sir Paul- and to a lesser extent Yoko – for the Beatles rights was a pretty unforgivable thing to do. It ended his friendship with Paul McCartney.

By: Shelly

Shelly — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:39:42 +0000

Although Debbie Rowe is the biological mother of MJ’s kids, I am not surprised at all that there are no provisions for her. She was more or less a surrogate to give MJ children than in involved mother.