Comments on: Debbie Rowe Takes Issue With ‘The New York Post’

By: Miss Nimbus

Miss Nimbus — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 12:20:43 +0000

I kindof think these stories about her are true (based), seems to be an aweful lot of them floating about… I think the kids should go to MJ’s mother as I think he wanted… and that Joe… god help those kids… Jackson 3 – Good God really!!!

By: rossy

rossy — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:52:11 +0000

Here’s something to ask yourselves – What do the KIDS WANT? & Will ANYONE (i.e. the Judge in the custody hearing, etc.) treat them like they have opinions, feelings & intelligence — or just yank them around because they can? *Let’s face it: Kids are pretty much invisible until they’re of Legal Age & can “contribute” to society by voting, working for a living & paying taxes.
-
Even if NO-ONE takes THEIR words in to account, the day WILL come when EACH of them is an adult, & can decide for themselves where they want to live, be with, etc. Till then, here’s hoping they be given some respect, understanding & privacy to grieve for the father they loved & lost too soon.

By: Joanne

Joanne — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 07:29:21 +0000

Whatever we think of DR – they need to print the facts … not bias speculation.

By: greer

greer — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 03:18:20 +0000

i’m sure she will take the cash and bail…otherwise she would never have done it the first time round…i think it sums up just what kind of person she is that she would even bother with the facade that she wants them..she has had nothing to do with them in years and quite happily signed over her parenting rights for money…its bad and wrong in so many ways….leave them with thier brother i say.

By: Grace

Grace — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:45:21 +0000

God, what a circus.
Didn’t Michael have a will in place that says who the kids should be placed with in case he died? No Godparents?

By: Malcolm McCrae

Malcolm McCrae — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:23:13 +0000

Im confused i thought i read somewhere that she gave up all rights to the children when she basically sold them the 1st time!? Or is it because she is the biological mother she gets her rights back?

Im kinda on the fence with this lady in one eye she looks like the woman who sold her children for loads of money, but the other she was never really a “mother” to them just the egg donor. idk, i just hope they go in the hands of the right person that will raise them the way micheal did…out of the spotlight.

By: Rome

Rome — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:09:23 +0000

Of course she wants the money. And, by god, I hope she gets it because can you seriously picture those poor kids living with THAT woman? She is so gross.
The kids will be so much better taken care of by Michael’s mom. Plus, judging by the memorial footage, at least Paris seems to have a serious bond with the Jackson family. I doubt that they have seen their biological mother much since they were born.

By: PixiesBassline

PixiesBassline — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:55:23 +0000

Those poor children!!!

By: Jstar

Jstar — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:47:53 +0000

I have a feeling, as did many others, that now that MJ is no longer with us, she sees this as her last chance to cash in on his money…whether she wants the kids or not she wants the money.