‘Star’ Magazine Reports That Britney Spears & Jason Trawick Are Gettin Hitched’
The new coverphoto of this week’s issue of Star magazine has been revealed today and the headline reads: Britney Getting Married! According to the mag, Britney is planning to get hitched to her agent Jason Trawick. Could a walk down the aisle really be in the works for Britwick?
If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again! In the June 29 issue of Star, we exclusively report that after two failed marriages — one that last only 55 hours! — Britney Spears is preparing to walk down the aisle again, this time with her agent turned lover, Jason Trawick. After more than three years of casual hookups, Brit and Jason took their relationship to the next level while they were on vacation in the Bahamas last month. That’s when Brit and Jason shared a special night together during which Jason popped the question! “He didn’t exactly get down on one knee, but Brit didn’t care. She said yes, and they opened a bottle of champagne to celebrate,” says an insider. “Jason held Britney for a long time and kissed her cheeks. They talked about their future for hours and didn’t go to sleep until after 3 a.m.! They just wanted to be alone together.” Britney is already thinking about a December wedding — after her Circus world tour wraps this fall — and wants her big day to far outclass her previous ceremonies. For her first nuptials, to childhood friend Jason Alexander, her outfit consisted of a baseball cap and cutoffs! And she feels her wedding to Kevin Federline was a”trashy” affair. “When she marries Jason, she wants it to be like a fairy tale,” says a friend.
Well … before we break out the bubbly and start offering our congrats, there is more to this story. US Weekly contends that according to a “source” of their own, the Star report of Britwick’s upcoming nuptials are completely untrue:
Britney Spears is not engaged to her longtime agent Jason Trawick, a source close to the singer tells Usmagazine.com. “This is absolutely not true,” the source tells Us. “Britney is not engaged” … Her rep could not be reached for comment.
Not that I put much stock in either report but … my gut tells me that our dear Britney prolly is not engaged. Until we hear an announcement from her directly, I’m gonna hold off on buying my wedding gifts for the couple. That being said, I would love it if Britney got married to Jason Trawick … I think they would make an absolutely adorable little family. What do y’all think … engaged or not?
Tags: Britney Spears, Jason Trawick, Star Magazine
RSS
Feedburner
June 17th, 2009 at 11:49 am
seriously… he is just plain old UNATTRACTIVE.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:50 am
and seriously Star? good job on the turn over for that cover. that picture of RPatz is from like 2 days ago.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:58 am
Would you really encourage her decision to get married again so soon, Trent? Let’s say it’s for real for a minute. I know I wouldn’t, at all. Not because of him, but because it would be so rushed. And wasn’t that one of the main problems with the Federfuck? Or the other one whose name I don’t know?
June 17th, 2009 at 11:59 am
I like that they put a caption over his t-shirt that reads “So in Love! Britney & Jason” to make you think his shirt is really like that.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:31 pm
well you know what they say – 3rd times the charm!
blech.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:33 pm
I hope she will not get married, soon. Their relationship need time. Brit, don’t rush!
June 17th, 2009 at 12:33 pm
Is it wrong that I can’t wait to run out & get this trashy magazine?? For not only the Britwick goss, but omfg everyone’s poor eyes…that chick Danielle from the Real Housewives of NJ has a sextape out of her & her boytoy that could be her son!?!?!?! I loves me the trashy Star Mag!
June 17th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
Did anyone actually believe Star magazine?? they didn’t even use a new pix of Jason and Britney that’s ones from early 2008 and Jason is cute that’s just a bad pix .
June 17th, 2009 at 12:46 pm
If it were true, it’s NOT rushed, these 2 have been together for over a year – if the public knows about a relationship, that usually means it’s NOT new.
My friend once dated one of Drew Barrymore’s exes and when they met he swore up and down he & Drew were broken up and sure enough the tabloids found out they were broken up & ‘broke the news’ (HA) about 3 mos later.
June 17th, 2009 at 1:08 pm
First of all i think Jason is a good choice for Britney (from the little that we know about him off course), but i don’t think they are thinking about marrying anytime soon. She barely has any control over her own affairs, and i think she will want to have more control before venturing into another marriage.
June 17th, 2009 at 1:20 pm
Anyone noticed that they didn’t deny that they are romantically involved? ;)
June 17th, 2009 at 2:03 pm
Well because they ARE romantically involved. They’re just not engaged.
June 17th, 2009 at 3:05 pm
Oh Brit. I don’t think he’s handsome at all, but then again, he’s not a movie star. If he treats her good, and she’s happy, then that’s all that matters.
I hope however, this is not the calm before the storm. I’d hate to see this blow up in her face like her last marriage did. Proceed with caution Brit.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:48 pm
i refuse to believe its true! the report from Star magazine looked like its taken off a fairytale storybook! rubbish! Spreading lies just to sell their magazine.
June 18th, 2009 at 1:45 am
Am I the only one who thinks they are not even dating to begin with??
June 18th, 2009 at 3:59 am
They are confirming the relationship by denying the supposed engagement.
June 20th, 2009 at 5:30 am
Not engaged. Just a natural progression to news they are dating. Next week she’ll be pregnant if they can find a picture where she has a little belly.
@sue
Yep. That’s why Star Magazine did it. They could have denied the whole thing. Instead they just say they aren’t engaged. Tabloids do that all the time.
June 20th, 2009 at 6:27 pm
I’m with QT, I doubt they’re even dating. No pda in any pictures.