Holy shizz, y’all! Now … take the following information with a huge grain of salt, especially considering all the insane rumors flying around since Michael Jackson‘s death last Thursday … but considering this report comes from TMZ (the first outlet to report MJ‘s death hours before anyone else) it might have some weight. According to TMZ, sources close to the births of MJ‘s two oldest children with ex-wife Debbie Rowe — Prince Michael Joseph Jackson and Paris Michael Katherine Jackson — claim that neither Michael nor Debbie are the biological parents of the kids! If this report is true, then it would explain so much about those children:
We’ve learned Michael Jackson was not the biological father of any of his children. And Debbie Rowe is not the biological mother of the two kids she bore for Michael. All three children were conceived in vitro — outside the womb. Multiple sources deeply connected to the births tell us Michael was not the sperm donor for any of his kids. Debbie’s eggs were not used. She was merely the surrogate, and paid well for her services in the births of Michael Jr. and Paris. In the case of Prince Michael II (the youngest), we’re told the surrogate was never told of the identity of the “receiving parent” — Michael Jackson. Three days after Prince was born at Grossmont Hospital in San Diego County, Jackson’s lawyer came to the hospital to pick the baby up and deliver him to Michael. We do not know if Jackson chose the sperm or egg donors or if he even knew who they were. Although Rowe is not the biological mother, it’s not a slam dunk that she would lose a custody battle. This type of case has never been litigated in California courts. Since Rowe was married to Jackson when Michael Jr. and Paris were born, there’s a presumption that she’s the biological parent. That presumption can be rebutted by other evidence. We know there are documents outlining the whole arrangement for the birth of all three kids. Nonetheless, it’s still an open issue with the courts.
Holy MF SHIZZZZ!!!! Now, I realize that TMZ‘s sources may be completely wrong but … it would make so much sense if the children were not biologically borne of Michael Jackson or Debbie Rowe. None of the kids look AT ALL like MJ and Debbie has notoriously denied that the children “are hers”. She’s always said that the kids “belong to Michael Jackson” and that she is “not their mother”. US Weekly claims that MJ‘s dermatologist (and Debbie Rowe‘s former boss), Arnold Klein, is the biological father of the eldest MJ children. OMG! Of course this is still very speculative but the truth may, one day, come out. My guess is that either we’ll eventually learn everything surrounding the births of his children or we’ll never know anything. If the Jackson family has their way, my guess is that we’ll never find out the truth if, in fact, these allegations are true. But, in all honesty, I would not be surprised in the least if this report turns out to be the truth. I’ve had my suspicions all along about the paternity of MJ‘s children … but still … WOW! Thoughts?
UPDATE: OMG OMG!! Now TMZ reports that Michael Jackson never legally adopted any of his children!!!
We’ve learned Michael Jackson never adopted his three children, even though he’s not the biological father. We broke the story that neither Jackson nor Debbie Rowe are the biological parents of Michael Jr. and Paris. And Michael was not the biological parent of Prince Michael II either. Now here’s the rub. We’ve learned Jackson never filed legal papers to adopt any of his children. Legal experts tell us Jackson would be presumed the father but it’s not conclusive by any means. As for why Jackson didn’t formally adopt — we’re told at the time the kids were born there was no third party whom he believed would try and claim custody. For some reason, Jackson never thought Debbie Rowe would mount a custody challenge.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If MJ never legally adopted the kids then … does his mother Katherine Jackson have any claim on eventually winning guardianship of the kids? We know she filed paperwork here in California yesterday to take full custody of the children but if MJ neither biologically fathered NOR legally adopted the kids then … WTF?!
How long until the full truth comes out? Again I say … WOW!
[Source]
I think Paris looks SO much like Debbie…. the boys do look a little more bi-racial than Paris does… but that girl looks SO much like Debbie – it will be hard for me to accept that Deb isn’t her mother.
There is no way those children are his biological children. They have no black features whatsoever. Leave out the skin color–I’m black/white and I have white skin, as do both my siblings, although I think that’s relatively rare–and look at everything else. Nothing remotely resembling black features. This whole situation is effed up. I feel so sorry for those kids!
I think all of this is BS. Those kids are his and he doesn’t have to adopt his own children. It’s all hype and BS. Sadly this will go on for months and months.
Totally inappropriate to report this kind of stuff or even speculate. He is dead. They have lost the only father they have ever known. Matters regarding the children should be off limits. It’s bad enough MJ’s father is already trying to profit from him and steal from the children’s inheritence.
@ LG…profit from him and steal from the children’s inheritance?
ugh, so sick of all this speculation. I agree with others here – it doesn’t matter whether they are his bio kids or not. MJ is the ONLY father they’ve ever known, he raised them from babies and provided for them, now he is gone and they are grieving for him. …. and, for what its worth, I’m so surprised at how many people on all these comment boards think that all bi-racial children come out looking like a perfect mix of both races … bi-racial kids come in every color, shape, size, feature. you can’t always ‘tell’ just by looking.
I have two mixed children from the same man(before anyone asks, yes there have been DNA testing), and my oldest daughter is obviously bi-racial while the younger one you would never be able to tell. We’re talking very pale skin, lite brown hair with so-called white person texture, and dark blue eyes. It just goes to show that you never can tell how the genes are gonna come out. That being said, it never mattered whether the children have his DNA or not, they are his and he loved them very much(it was obvious). I think they should go to Janet he seemed to be closest to her than anyone else.The kids really don’t know and haven’t been around Debbie,and his parents are too old and we all know he had problems with his father. If Joe did get them I wouldn’t be surprised if we had a new Jackson singing group within months. He had no problem using his kids for a paycheck whats going to make it any different with his grandkids?
@ab You are absolutely right on all counts. MJ was their Dad, the Jacksons are their family, and that should be what counts. And bi-racial kids can embody just one race or both. Look at Heidi Klum’s and Seal’s children!
I hope the children stay with the Jacksons but away from 80 year old papa Joe. Katherine loved Michael and she has their best intrest.
Heidi and Seal’s two children together look like bi-racial children to me. I personally have never seen bi-racial children that weren’t immediately identifiable as such, although I do not doubt that they exist. As a kid, MJ had features very easily identifiable as African-American, and his two oldest kids do not in the least, IMHO.
Does this matter? NO. He was their father, he cared for them and raised them and they are his children, no matter if he is the biological father or not. The fact that Debbie might not be the bio mother….wow. What a tangled web we weave… Please, all that is holy, keep those kids from the clutches of Joe Jackson.
@Nikki…………….yes, Joe Jackson is making public appearences just days after his son unexpectedly dies. He is plugging his company. He made a public statement that he is legally in control of MJ’s estate. His actions are questionable.
Um HOLY SHIT!!! I knew that tons of secrets were bound to come out after Michael’s death but this?! I’m not sure I was prepared for something of this magnitude!! IMHO the kids look bi-racial. Until recently, we’ve never gotten a truely good look at them to really be able to see who they resemble. Also Michael has gone under so many different plastic surgeries over the years it would probably take photos of him as a teen or young adult to really be able to tell if they look like him…this is all such craziness! At the very least I do hope that Katherine Jackson gets to keep the kids at least until this whole mess can be deemed valid and straightened out. They are probably the most comfortable with her and after everything that’s happened, I’m sure that’s what they need right now. I do sincerely hope though, that no matter what happens, those kids are kept well away from Granddaddy Joe Jackson… after all these years he still looks like a leech!
If it’s true that the children aren’t his biologically, for reasons such as this (unexpected death) wouldn’t it have been smart of Michael to sign adoption papers regardless if he was on the birth certificate? Or at least have an updated will? There is no saying that the bio dad (i personally don’t believe MJ is the bio dad. it’s being reported that it was MJ’s dermo) won’t go after custody of these kids, just because he is the bio dad. There should’ve been something IRON CLAD, in writing, as to what should happen to the kids if something happens to Michael. I’m not saying there isn’t, but people are scrambling to find a will, and they come up with one from 2002.
You know, nobody ever seems to give a shit about the kids feelings on all of this.
Hopefully they won’t grow up feeling lost or disconnected.
Who cares if he isn’t the biological father….to those children, Michael Jackson is their father!! Leave the damn kids alone and let them live their lives w/their grandmother! This poor man had died, let him rest in peace and let his children be in peace too!
Obviously they are not his, the kids are WHITE! Michael Jackson is suppose to be black he might have white skin but his genes would still be black, meaning dark curly hair for the kids and a darker complexion which they do not have.
Wow seriously whoever believes this report is seriously an idiot, including you Trent…. it was already said that Debbie Rowe participated in no such interview. Also, you must be blind if you can’t see how much Jackson’s oldest son looks exactly like him. In either case, who the hell are we to speculate… he loved those kids and that is all that matters. Also, I’m sure the last thing his kids want to hear at the moment is that Jackson is not their father. Wow, people are starting to piss me off.
@Jada — this is not the NOTW interview, this is TMZ reporting what they’re hearing from their sources. TMZ tends to get these stories very right. You can believe what you want, as can other people.
Also, Jackson’s eldest daughter looks exactly like Debbie Rowe. Wow you guys are a bunch of jackasses.
It’s pathetic that you are re-publishing all of this crap. Just because you write “take it with a grain of salt” doesn’t absolve you of being disgusting for spreading these rumors and BS. Like all of the other sites that can’t care less about truth,or the fact that the man hasn’t even been buried yet, I’m sure you couldn’t care less either as long as you make a buck off of him. I stopped reading Perez two years ago. This site is becoming just as much of a disgrace.
@John — I will continue to blog the way I have always blogged, I make no apologies for my opinions. Your claim that my site is anything like that other blog is ludicrous.
Why is everyone so shocked about this??? It has been reported for some time now that Michael Jackson is not the biological father of those kids…have we all been living under a rock?