<html>
<head>
<body>
selam genclik bugun size <h1><a href="http://www.kedez.me/" title="adult izle, porno izle, sikis izle">porno</a></h1>
nedir anlatacagim artik porno bir abaza isi olarak gorulmemektedir cunku <a href="http://www.kedez.me/xvideos.htm" title="xvideos">xvideos</a>
da sinirsiz  sikis izlenir ve izledikleriniz sadece siz deil <a href="http://www.kedez.me/gizlesene.htm" title="gizlesene">gizlesene</a>
olup abazaligin sinirini zorlayarak <a href="http://www.kedez.me/kategori/Liseli_Videolar" title="liseli sikis">liseli sikis</a>
videolarimizla <a href="http://www.kedez.me/kategori/Gotten-Sikis" title="götten sikiş">götten sikiş</a> seksin sinirlarini zorlamak mumkundur ve ayrica en kaliteli olan <a href="http://www.kedez.me/redtube-com.htm" title="redtube">redtube</a>
videolarinide sizler icin koyduk ve asla unutmayin <a href="http://www.kedez.me/" title="adult izle, porno izle, sikis izle">adult izle, porno izle, sikis izle</a>
adreslerimiz sizler icin hizmet vermektedir <a href="http://www.kedez.me/kategori/Rus-Porno" title="rus pornosu">rus pornosu</a> kalitenin dorugu burdadir 
<a href="http://www.kedez.me/pornogillerin-beyaz-corapli-hocasini-siktik.html" title="pornogiller">pornogiller</a>
 eger olurda <a href="http://www.kedez.me/kutunel.htm" title="kutunel">kutunel</a>
ararsaniz onu da bizde bulabilirsiniz <a href="http://www.kedez.me/rokettube-gibi-roketliyor-sikini-karisinin-gotune.html" title="rokettube">rokettube</a> sizler icin
hepberaber izleyelim.
</head>
</body>
</html>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The California Supreme Court Rules To Uphold Prop 8, Uphold Ban On Same-Sex Marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 04:30:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jazz</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-2/#comment-296317</link>
		<dc:creator>Jazz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 14:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-296317</guid>
		<description>Straight people make more of a butchery of marriage than gay people ever will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Straight people make more of a butchery of marriage than gay people ever will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bleeding Ears</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-2/#comment-295889</link>
		<dc:creator>Bleeding Ears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 22:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-295889</guid>
		<description>In response to me? I wasn&#039;t aware I asked you something... haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to me? I wasn&#8217;t aware I asked you something&#8230; haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anony</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-2/#comment-295880</link>
		<dc:creator>Anony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 21:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-295880</guid>
		<description>I am glad that the CA supreme court seems to have issued an impartial ruling in this case, but in response to &quot;bleeding ears&quot; I have to say simply: we don&#039;t know people are gay.  I can&#039;t imagine WHY someone would choose to be gay if they knew that a large proportion of the population would spew hatred at them.  It just doesn&#039;t make sense.  I have my own theories of nature AND nurture, but no time for that here...

However, that being said, I am glad that no one (at least in the threads I can see) is bashing any religion.  Nothing will be accomplished by either side if subgroups of the &quot;for&quot; and &quot;against&quot; are being malicious and hateful towards each other.  This calls for a civil dialogue and understanding of both sides of this highly charged issue, not for knee-jerk reactions and maliciousness.

I have about a dozen gay friends, and I have appreciated their willingness to listen to me, and they have expressed the same for me being willing to listen to their side, and while we don&#039;t agree, we can disagree without being disagreeable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad that the CA supreme court seems to have issued an impartial ruling in this case, but in response to &#8220;bleeding ears&#8221; I have to say simply: we don&#8217;t know people are gay.  I can&#8217;t imagine WHY someone would choose to be gay if they knew that a large proportion of the population would spew hatred at them.  It just doesn&#8217;t make sense.  I have my own theories of nature AND nurture, but no time for that here&#8230;</p>
<p>However, that being said, I am glad that no one (at least in the threads I can see) is bashing any religion.  Nothing will be accomplished by either side if subgroups of the &#8220;for&#8221; and &#8220;against&#8221; are being malicious and hateful towards each other.  This calls for a civil dialogue and understanding of both sides of this highly charged issue, not for knee-jerk reactions and maliciousness.</p>
<p>I have about a dozen gay friends, and I have appreciated their willingness to listen to me, and they have expressed the same for me being willing to listen to their side, and while we don&#8217;t agree, we can disagree without being disagreeable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sirena</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-2/#comment-295845</link>
		<dc:creator>Sirena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 20:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-295845</guid>
		<description>I tried not to get my hopes up, but I am so devastated. Today, the coolness of that supercoolest of states has dimmed.
Everyone in this country knows - even those that are devoting everything they have to suppressing the marriage rights of gays in this country - we all know that the tide will keep moving toward freedom for all. This is an inevitability, and only time will tell the truth about the tyranny that tied us in the past. And by saying &quot;us,&quot; I mean all of us as a part of the great human family. If I, a married, heterosexual conservative woman can say this - hardly someone on the edge of a terrifying lunatic fringe hell-bent on destroying marriage forever - can&#039;t we all? 

Dr. King said something that resonates with the fight for civil rights for all humankind. Today that fight is for marriage rights for gays. Tomorrow, it might be for something that you hold profoundly dear:


When our days become dreary with low-hovering clouds of despair, and when our nights become darker than a thousand midnights, let us remember that there is a creative force in this universe, working to pull down the gigantic mountains of evil, a power that is able to make a way out of no way and transform dark yesterdays into bright tomorrows. Let us realize the arc of the moral universe is long but it bends toward justice.
Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried not to get my hopes up, but I am so devastated. Today, the coolness of that supercoolest of states has dimmed.<br />
Everyone in this country knows &#8211; even those that are devoting everything they have to suppressing the marriage rights of gays in this country &#8211; we all know that the tide will keep moving toward freedom for all. This is an inevitability, and only time will tell the truth about the tyranny that tied us in the past. And by saying &#8220;us,&#8221; I mean all of us as a part of the great human family. If I, a married, heterosexual conservative woman can say this &#8211; hardly someone on the edge of a terrifying lunatic fringe hell-bent on destroying marriage forever &#8211; can&#8217;t we all? </p>
<p>Dr. King said something that resonates with the fight for civil rights for all humankind. Today that fight is for marriage rights for gays. Tomorrow, it might be for something that you hold profoundly dear:</p>
<p>When our days become dreary with low-hovering clouds of despair, and when our nights become darker than a thousand midnights, let us remember that there is a creative force in this universe, working to pull down the gigantic mountains of evil, a power that is able to make a way out of no way and transform dark yesterdays into bright tomorrows. Let us realize the arc of the moral universe is long but it bends toward justice.<br />
Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bleeding Ears</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-2/#comment-295844</link>
		<dc:creator>Bleeding Ears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 20:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-295844</guid>
		<description>@yaya...  I&#039;m just curious, do you think gay people choose to be gay or do you think they are born gay?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@yaya&#8230;  I&#8217;m just curious, do you think gay people choose to be gay or do you think they are born gay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janelle</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-2/#comment-295831</link>
		<dc:creator>Janelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 20:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-295831</guid>
		<description>@Ally - I&#039;m so glad someone else was thinking what I was thinking.
I&#039;m so ashamed of my state, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ally &#8211; I&#8217;m so glad someone else was thinking what I was thinking.<br />
I&#8217;m so ashamed of my state, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-295812</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 20:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-295812</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s just such a &quot;come here / go away&quot;  duality to uphold the ban (boo) yet continue to recognize the legality of marriages performed last year (yay).
...
Living in a place where gay marriage has been legal for quite some time, it&#039;s plain to see that ONE DAY the right thing will be done in California.  When it is, it won&#039;t take long for the citizens of that state to grow with the understanding that this simply another aspect of life in a contemporary society - like audio crosswalks for blind pedestrians, awesome new Star Trek movies, and figuring out what you can do in your own home to combat climate change.  It&#039;s just part of life and that&#039;s that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s just such a &#8220;come here / go away&#8221;  duality to uphold the ban (boo) yet continue to recognize the legality of marriages performed last year (yay).<br />
&#8230;<br />
Living in a place where gay marriage has been legal for quite some time, it&#8217;s plain to see that ONE DAY the right thing will be done in California.  When it is, it won&#8217;t take long for the citizens of that state to grow with the understanding that this simply another aspect of life in a contemporary society &#8211; like audio crosswalks for blind pedestrians, awesome new Star Trek movies, and figuring out what you can do in your own home to combat climate change.  It&#8217;s just part of life and that&#8217;s that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-295803</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-295803</guid>
		<description>We all have to remember how this went down. A large percent morons used millions of dollars to spread lies, fear and misinformation to the people they believed would listen to them and vote accordingly. In this case, it was the church which is primarily African Americans who then believed that their pastors would be hauled off to jail if they failed to perform same-sex weddings. This was just one of many ads that ran when Prop 8 was on the ballot. It was a blatant lie and totally ridiculous. Due to the fact that Obama was running for president, there was already a higher than average turn out rate of African American voters...So where do we go from here? It&#039;s about educating the people who vote against us. In America there is a separation of church and state. Likewise, there should be a separation between state and what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all have to remember how this went down. A large percent morons used millions of dollars to spread lies, fear and misinformation to the people they believed would listen to them and vote accordingly. In this case, it was the church which is primarily African Americans who then believed that their pastors would be hauled off to jail if they failed to perform same-sex weddings. This was just one of many ads that ran when Prop 8 was on the ballot. It was a blatant lie and totally ridiculous. Due to the fact that Obama was running for president, there was already a higher than average turn out rate of African American voters&#8230;So where do we go from here? It&#8217;s about educating the people who vote against us. In America there is a separation of church and state. Likewise, there should be a separation between state and what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meghan</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-295787</link>
		<dc:creator>Meghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-295787</guid>
		<description>How sad is it that same sex couples can get married in Iowa, but not in California??? That is just ridiculous. Who would have thought Iowa more progressive than California?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How sad is it that same sex couples can get married in Iowa, but not in California??? That is just ridiculous. Who would have thought Iowa more progressive than California?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniela</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-295778</link>
		<dc:creator>daniela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-295778</guid>
		<description>Even though I am not an American and not gay, it&#039;s still upsetting. I was crossing my fingers that those stuffy old men and dried up prunes would actually open their minds. It&#039;s a small consolation that they won&#039;t annul the marriages made during the six months but at least it&#039;s something?
I really do hope they&#039;ll put out another referendum next year. Come on Cali, what the ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though I am not an American and not gay, it&#8217;s still upsetting. I was crossing my fingers that those stuffy old men and dried up prunes would actually open their minds. It&#8217;s a small consolation that they won&#8217;t annul the marriages made during the six months but at least it&#8217;s something?<br />
I really do hope they&#8217;ll put out another referendum next year. Come on Cali, what the ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jstar</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-295776</link>
		<dc:creator>Jstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-295776</guid>
		<description>My heart aches...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My heart aches&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-295771</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-295771</guid>
		<description>This is really terrible news, I hope everyone will go out to a rally tonight, they are in 93 different cities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really terrible news, I hope everyone will go out to a rally tonight, they are in 93 different cities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ally</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-295763</link>
		<dc:creator>Ally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-295763</guid>
		<description>Trent -- I hope three years of law school helped that one.  Ha!  I sincerly hope that there is someone out there thinking the same thing that has enough experience to win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trent &#8212; I hope three years of law school helped that one.  Ha!  I sincerly hope that there is someone out there thinking the same thing that has enough experience to win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-295762</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-295762</guid>
		<description>Too sad for words. I also am not surprised at the outcome but was hoping for a miracle. 
Me and my b/f have been together for over 14 years, he is even an ordained minister and has already led a wedding. Yet we 2 cannot get married. 
Atleast here in WA state as of June 26th we will have all the rights of a married couple under the new domestic partnership for same sex couples. Of course, the religious right here is now starting a ref 71 to overturn that, even though domestic partnership has absolutely nothing to do with the church. 
All I want is to spend the rest of my life with the one I love. Let them keep saying we&#039;re &quot;illegal&quot;, it&#039;s not gonna break us up. It makes us stronger in our love. No one, especially the government or churches will ever take that from me. EVER!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too sad for words. I also am not surprised at the outcome but was hoping for a miracle.<br />
Me and my b/f have been together for over 14 years, he is even an ordained minister and has already led a wedding. Yet we 2 cannot get married.<br />
Atleast here in WA state as of June 26th we will have all the rights of a married couple under the new domestic partnership for same sex couples. Of course, the religious right here is now starting a ref 71 to overturn that, even though domestic partnership has absolutely nothing to do with the church.<br />
All I want is to spend the rest of my life with the one I love. Let them keep saying we&#8217;re &#8220;illegal&#8221;, it&#8217;s not gonna break us up. It makes us stronger in our love. No one, especially the government or churches will ever take that from me. EVER!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda in San Diego</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-295760</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda in San Diego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-295760</guid>
		<description>I know that we&#039;ll see the day that every Californian has equal right to marry in my lifetime, I have no doubt. That&#039;s clearly not the case right now but this goes to show that we have a long way to go in our fight for true equality for all. Just as women had to fight for their vote and African-Americans have fought for freedom &amp; equality, our Gay &amp; Lesbians citizens are also forced to fight for their rights. We as Americans have always fought for our freedom and this is no different. Straight against H8!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that we&#8217;ll see the day that every Californian has equal right to marry in my lifetime, I have no doubt. That&#8217;s clearly not the case right now but this goes to show that we have a long way to go in our fight for true equality for all. Just as women had to fight for their vote and African-Americans have fought for freedom &amp; equality, our Gay &amp; Lesbians citizens are also forced to fight for their rights. We as Americans have always fought for our freedom and this is no different. Straight against H8!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yea</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-295757</link>
		<dc:creator>yea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-295757</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t care less. OMFG so not p.c. but I don&#039;t really care-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t care less. OMFG so not p.c. but I don&#8217;t really care-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sweet_Lady</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-295755</link>
		<dc:creator>Sweet_Lady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-295755</guid>
		<description>very disappointing to hear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very disappointing to hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madsme</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-295752</link>
		<dc:creator>Madsme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-295752</guid>
		<description>Boo. Poor show, California. Get out of the bedroom already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boo. Poor show, California. Get out of the bedroom already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Gyllenhaal</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-295747</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Gyllenhaal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-295747</guid>
		<description>SO SAD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SO SAD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cam</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-295739</link>
		<dc:creator>Cam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-295739</guid>
		<description>Even though the court has upheld Proposition 8, a key portion of the court’s May 15, 2008, decision remains intact. Sexual orientation will continue to receive the strongest constitutional protection possible when California courts consider cases of alleged discrimination. The California Supreme Court is the only state high court in the nation to have elevated sexual orientation to the status of race and gender in weighing discrimination claims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though the court has upheld Proposition 8, a key portion of the court’s May 15, 2008, decision remains intact. Sexual orientation will continue to receive the strongest constitutional protection possible when California courts consider cases of alleged discrimination. The California Supreme Court is the only state high court in the nation to have elevated sexual orientation to the status of race and gender in weighing discrimination claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brenda</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-295738</link>
		<dc:creator>brenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-295738</guid>
		<description>SAD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SAD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It's Trent, Bitch!</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-295737</link>
		<dc:creator>It's Trent, Bitch!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-295737</guid>
		<description>@Ally -- you are absolutely right, your legal explanation is right on.  I&#039;ve always contended that this matter will be taken up on the national level, which is why Supreme Court nominees are VERY important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ally &#8212; you are absolutely right, your legal explanation is right on.  I&#8217;ve always contended that this matter will be taken up on the national level, which is why Supreme Court nominees are VERY important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ally</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-295734</link>
		<dc:creator>Ally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-295734</guid>
		<description>This is extremely unfortunate.  From a legal stand point, I believe that the CA Supreme Court did what they had to.  Their job is to uphold the constitution and since the amendment is now part of that constitution, they upheld it.  I think the best thing to happen right now is for a couple that legally marries in one state (say Iowa), moves somewhere that will not let them marry but will recognize the union (I believe DC does this) and then moves to a state where they would not be allowed to get married AND will not recognize their union (like say VA).  Then they could challenge the state (VA) based on equal protection, reciprocity, and I&#039;m sure other things that I do not have the time to research.  Since most states will recognize civil unions from other states even if they do not allow it in their state, I think it would work.  Like a Dread Scott (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford) for the modern age, but hopefully more successful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is extremely unfortunate.  From a legal stand point, I believe that the CA Supreme Court did what they had to.  Their job is to uphold the constitution and since the amendment is now part of that constitution, they upheld it.  I think the best thing to happen right now is for a couple that legally marries in one state (say Iowa), moves somewhere that will not let them marry but will recognize the union (I believe DC does this) and then moves to a state where they would not be allowed to get married AND will not recognize their union (like say VA).  Then they could challenge the state (VA) based on equal protection, reciprocity, and I&#8217;m sure other things that I do not have the time to research.  Since most states will recognize civil unions from other states even if they do not allow it in their state, I think it would work.  Like a Dread Scott (<a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford"  rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D......_Sandford</a>) for the modern age, but hopefully more successful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VV</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-295729</link>
		<dc:creator>VV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-295729</guid>
		<description>Very disappointing, but not hugely surprising.  There will be equality one day, but it&#039;ll be a long slog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very disappointing, but not hugely surprising.  There will be equality one day, but it&#8217;ll be a long slog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shannon</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2009/05/the-california-supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-prop-8-uphold-ban-on-same-sex-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-295724</link>
		<dc:creator>shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/?p=30463#comment-295724</guid>
		<description>Personally, I find the fact that the 18,000 same-sex marriages performed before Prop 8 passed are still valid to be even more discriminatory than Prop 8 itself. I&#039;m a believer in all or nothing in this case. Either legally recognize same-sex marriages regardless of when they were performed or don&#039;t legally recognize them at all.

California residents: start collecting signatures now to get a Constitutional amendment on your ballot that overturns Prop 8 entirely and truly makes all monogamous marriages in the state equal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I find the fact that the 18,000 same-sex marriages performed before Prop 8 passed are still valid to be even more discriminatory than Prop 8 itself. I&#8217;m a believer in all or nothing in this case. Either legally recognize same-sex marriages regardless of when they were performed or don&#8217;t legally recognize them at all.</p>
<p>California residents: start collecting signatures now to get a Constitutional amendment on your ballot that overturns Prop 8 entirely and truly makes all monogamous marriages in the state equal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 9/40 queries in 0.074 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.pinkisthenewblog.com @ 2012-02-16 21:27:59 -->
