Jessica Simpson is featured on the cover and in the pages of the new issue of Vanity Fair magazine. Unfortch for her, the cover is prolly the fuglist one that the magazine has ever published … ever. The fugness has nothing really do with Jessica Simpson herself (tho, I should confess that I don’t really like the picture of her that was chosen for the cover) and everything to do with the horrible, jumbled use of texts and graphics. It looks like a total confusing mess. Here is Jessica on the cover of the June issue of Vanity Fair along with a portion of her coverstory interview (which was shared by her Dallas Cowboys beau Tony Romo):

Having professed her love for Tony Romo – whom she’s been dating since Thanksgiving 2007 – Jessica Simpson now has the Dallas Cowboys quarterback speaking up about her. “We’re very similar in that we both appreciate the hometown feel to a lot of things, and live our life like that,” Romo, described as “big, easy, handsome,” tells the June issue of Vanity Fair (on sale in New York and Los Angeles May 6 and nationally May 12). “She comes to a ton of games,” he says. “She’s a supportive girlfriend.” Not that this has been unanimously viewed as an advantage. In what at the time was perceived as a curse – and, as Vanity Fair’s Rich Cohen points out, in Texas where the Cowboys are a religion, Simpson’s dating Romo is like she’s dating the Pope – the couple vacationed in Mexico before the Cowboys lost to the New York Giants in the 2008 NFL playoffs. The Giants, meanwhile, went on to win the Super Bowl. According to Romo, 29, between games, “A lot of people head to Vegas, go back to their hometowns, colleges, and stuff. I was just like, ‘Let’s rent a house and sit around and watch football.’ It seemed like a good decision. But when you’re in the public eye, things can be perceived differently.” He adds, “You know, it’s very hard when you lose, because games are important, and so many people put so much time and effort in. It’s nice to have someone to come home to and try and make you feel better.” Simpson, 28, concurs. “That’s how the story goes,” she says. “Can’t help it. But we don’t let it affect our relationship. If we did, we wouldn’t be together, because it happened at the very beginning. Dating the Cowboys quarterback comes with hype, the fans, the bloggers, but I’ve never dated a guy that was more simple. I’m always there for him after a game, and he knows he has me to come home to.” Home is definitely an important refuge, because, as the profile also chronicles, life isn’t always easy for Simpson. Her “sudden weight gain,” though apparently now under control, left her looking “less than slender,” the magazine reports. Then there are her professional highs and lows, which include a not particularly enviable movie box-office record and a musical identity that is anything but constant, prompting Sony Music head Tommy Mottola to say, “I think she absolutely needs to re-invent herself.” At the same time, Mottola (who signed Simpson to her first label, in 1997), warns Simpson against flip-flopping between pop, Christian rock and country music – and thereby confusing her audience. In the face of such challenges, Simpson, underscoring her spiritual self, says, “We all go through trials, but not one thing has ever made me question God. I have a great relationship with God. I can talk to him, get mad at him, frustrated with him. But, ultimately, my faith is what defines me.” Besides, she adds, “There will always be another opportunity, another door to walk through.”
Ugh, the cover is really bad … but good for her for scoring the VF cover in the first place. She really doesn’t have anything of interest to talk about with the mag. I guess I’m not entirely sure why she got the cover in the first place … she’s got no new movies on the horizon (nor any old movies worth talking about) and no new album about to be released (she actually just got let go from her Country music label) … AND it’s not even football season to make Romo‘s participation in the interview relevant. The entire feel of her VF coverpiece is focused on her apparent shortcomings and setbacks. Is any of this really worthy of a magazine cover? Surely the magazine, at the very least, published a stunning photoshoot to offset the lackluster interview … right? After the jump, check out a few photos from Jessica Simpson‘s Vanity Fair photospread and judge for yourself …

Snoozeville. I have to say that I am very surprised that Vanity Fair magazine would devote so much coverage to someone who really doesn’t have anything going on right now. No offense to Jessica but what about her life right now is coverstory worthy? If you are at all interested, you can read Jessica‘s VF interview online HERE … mebbe you’ll find something of value in there. I couldn’t find anything worth writing home about. The whole thing is just … meh.





























Why is she famous? What in the world has she done that is worth anything? Blah.
Like it or not, this cover works, here’s why—It looks nothing like the same old celebrity cover we see each and every month. It stands out. All the news outlets today (including this one) are talking about this interveiw and this cover. Don’t believe me? Go to USA today, the British SUN, even friggin’ Foxnews. And I think on this cover (which was purposely retro styled) she looks a little like Grace Kelly or Ursula Andress which is not a bad thing. And inside she reminds me of Raquel Welch. Could the photos be a little better—sure, but I think these present her in a much more interesting way then another Daisy Duke or Maxim styled photo shoot—which I’ve seen enough of—unless they’re going to start putting men on the cover that way. :)
I love the pictures! I wish more people would support Jessica Simpson! She is very talented, incredibly down to earth, and gorgeous!!!
Is she like.. having one of those “that feels so good squeezing that turd out” in the last picture.
Trent, you’re smoking crack or somethin cause i think she looks great in this! – really great!
Why is she on the cover of vanity fair?
@ chase that was vogue not VF
Personally, I don’t mind the cover shot..And is it just me, or does she look like a white version of Eva Mendes in the close up face shot? I’m not a fan or anything, but I don’t mind the girl..
I totally thought it read ‘cleavage’ and not ‘coverage’ !!! LOL
I think she’s inherently likable and most people want to her succeed. A friend who served in Afghanistan said she flew over there and gave a knock-out performance. I like her just for doing that.
(The two pictures of her in the black dress though are the worst.)
Mr. Averjen; I agree 100%
I think it really stand out amongst the other mags w/ rhe airbrushed hair flying everywhere looks. VF is running a business that needs to sell mags, they acheived that by putting such a polarizing subject on the cover and this picture that grabs your eye w/ the sharp contrasts of color. Well played VF.
cut her some slack, there’s no reason NOT to like it. i think she likes pretty in these pictures!
I like the cover a lot. Jessica might not be the right choice for a VF spread (article & Q/A), but she looks beautiful. Love the colors-fresh and clean.
She is one of the most physically beautiful women of her generation. I am always in awe by her looks.
Jessica looks fantastic. She’s a beautiful and talented young lady, and I enjoy seeing and hearing her. People who criticize her…………jealous???? Childish???
Wow…people are sooo bitter. I myself like Jessica Simpson as a person. She is funny in interviews I see and very kind it seems. I have seen two straight to dvd movies of hers and to be honest I laughed more at those two movies than any other big screen comedy hit in years, check out Major Movie Star DVD or Blonde Ambition, she was fantastic in both of those movies. As for the VF cover she as always looks amazing! Stop hating people. I must say this website is getting as catty and immature as perez hiltons followers. Grown up and show some class people.
I totally agree about the graphic layout for the cover & thought the photo was a poor choice– until I saw the other photos. The cover photo is genius compared to those other shots. She’s a very pretty girl, but she CAN NOT model for a photo. There is absolutely nothing coming through that lens. I’m surprised the photographer & VF would even settle for this. It’s a sad choice for her in this industry: she doesn’t know how to sing, can’t pick movies (maybe she can act–I haven’t watched her movies), she’s photogenic but can’t BRING IT… She’s needs to quit the industry & find something else that motivates & inspires her. It’s a waste for everybody. I remember seeing her sing, early on before she “hit?”, live on the Latin Grammys (???) & it was PAINFUL. Way off pitch, screaming like she was some MariahCarey. In retrospect I wonder, “Who did Daddy blow to get her on that show?” Good looks can open a lot of doors. After that it’s up to you, Miss Jess.
I’m as big a Jessica Simpson fan as any straight guy could be and I gotta say the pictures just reminded me of how tired I am right now……
Yes having her on the cover has people talking. Well at least on this blog because I don’t think I’ve seen it mentioned anywhere else. Doesn’t mean she can sell a magazine especially when she can’t even sell a cd.