Gisele Bündchen & Tom Brady Pay Another Visit To The Family Doctor?
Late Friday afternoon, we got a report from Radar Online that insists that Gisele Bündchen and Tom Brady are pregs with their first child together. As you may recall, we saw photos of the couple making their way in to a gynecologist office here in NYC earlier this month and this weekend, they paid another visit to the very same doctor’s office …
… as you can see, the circumstantial evidence is adding up. In a court of law, this would prove nothing … in the blogosphere, it seems like pretty good proof that the couple may be preparing the way for a baby. We already know that the couple doesn’t like talking to the press so I wouldn’t expect any confirmation (or denial, necessarily) from them any time soon. That said, I would guess that Gisele might be the kind of woman to start showing pretty quickly. She’s so tiny, any protrusion is bound to be obvs. In any event, I really do hope this report of pregsness is true. Gisele and Tom would most assuredly make a beautiful baby. I can’t wait to find out.
[Photo credit: Splash News]
Tags: Gisele Bündchen, Tom Brady
RSS
Feedburner
May 24th, 2009 at 7:24 am
In a court of law, this would prove nothing … in the blogosphere, it seems like pretty good proof that the couple may be preparing the way for a baby. –> This is so true, Trent. Hahaha
May 24th, 2009 at 7:27 am
I think she just has a rash that won’t go away so they keep having to go back…or ya maybe she’s pregs LMAO
May 24th, 2009 at 8:06 am
trent, i think that these are the same photos! if you look closely, both Tom and Gisele are wearing the exact same outfit as the photos from a few weeks ago. I have heard of celebs trying to wear similar outfits when they go out so that their photos won’t be worth the same money, but these are exactly the same! I don’t think that this is evidence of a second trip to the baby doctor :)
May 24th, 2009 at 9:49 am
jdub right, this photo’s pretty much the exact photo you had on last week, just at a different angle.
I wonder if they actually went again, or if they’re just pimping out the photos again with a “new story” and hoping no one notices.
May 24th, 2009 at 2:41 pm
My mom wasn’t very skinny when pregnant with me, and she ballooned almost right away, then a few years later when my sister came along, she was quite skinny and VERY muscular, and didn’t show at all until she was six months. Which was really amazing, as I was (and still am) quite tiny, and my sister was (and still is) extremely massive (you could see her limbs moving across Mom’s belly, creepy). Maybe if she’s fairly muscular, or has great genes, she won’t show for awhile. Or she might pop out any day now. Will have to wait and see how it progresses.
That is, assuming she actually is knocked up.
May 25th, 2009 at 1:35 am
@Elle O. Elle
“you could see her limbs moving across Mom’s belly, creepy”
That made my jaw drop =O
But yea, i dont think she’s pregnant, and if she is, we’ll just have to wait till she tells us all. Or starts showing.. for real..
May 25th, 2009 at 1:58 am
i agree with jdub and selina these photos show them wearing the exact same outfit.who knows hope she is having a baby that would be great and we could start a new bump watch.thanks for posting
May 25th, 2009 at 8:30 pm
i think its completely gross to start the “bump watch” so early and in such an invasive fashion. prenatal care is vital, and you are exploiting the need to care for a unborn child so you can get more hits on your site. truly revolting, like Paris-level-revolting. many things can go wrong so early in a pregnancy, and some things should be left up to the couple, if/when they are ready to announce. now, tell me to ‘calm down’ and not take it so seriously. then go thru miscarriages in public, and tell me that again.
May 25th, 2009 at 8:59 pm
Hey disgusting, “calm down and don’t take it so seriously”. you seriously should get a life. If you are so offended then go somewhere else, it’s really that easy. Try it!
May 25th, 2009 at 10:26 pm
I agree with ‘this is disgusting’ … so many early pregnancies end in miscarriage – then for the female celeb it gets reported as a ‘tragic’ tabloid tale. Not everything in life should be tabloid fodder.
**********
and ‘me’ – “should get a life”? … This story is about a life.
May 26th, 2009 at 2:11 am
Nah, I just think she needed more Valtrex this time.
May 26th, 2009 at 9:19 am
Pregnancy is just one of many, many reasons for going to an ob/gyn’s office multiple times. She could have had an abnormal Pap smear, she could have ovarian cysts large enough to need frequent monitoring, she could be having a breast cancer scare, etc.
May 26th, 2009 at 10:50 am
Whatever the reason, Tom looks stoked!! Who wouldn’t want two babies under 2???
May 26th, 2009 at 10:50 am
Tommy Appleseed.
May 26th, 2009 at 3:51 pm
@the oh-so-original “me” – if you are offended by “this is disgusting”’s comment, you. too, can just scroll on by, you know. It really does work both ways, you clever little thing :-)