Archive for March 16th, 2009

Zac Efron ‘Interview’ed By Gus Vant Sant

Gets it on with a dirrrty nekkid girl
Monday, March 16th, 2009

Last Friday we got to see Zac Efron on the cover of the new issue of Interview magazine but, at the time, no other photos nor the interview was available online. Today, we get to check out a few photos from Zac’s Interview photospread along with a portion of his interview with famed director Gus Vant Sant:


Unless you’ve got children of a certain age, you probably haven’t seen much of Zac Efron’s work. This is it, so far, in a nutshell: Efron is the star of Disney’s High School Musical franchise, which ostensibly revolves around the blooming relationship between Troy (Efron) and Gabriella (Vanessa Hudgens), a jock and a brain respectively, who couldn’t be more different from each other but who discover a common ground in their mutual love for music. Their (chaste) courtship involves various plot twists and adolescent entanglements enacted through a series of song-and-dance numbers. That, essentially, is a High School Musical movie. In the past three years, Disney has produced a trio of them, and it’s now estimated that the films, plus all of the attendant HSM (as the kids like to call it) merchandising, has generated more than $1 billion in revenues. It hasn’t hurt the cause that Efron got together with Hudgens in real life, and that he also appeared in Adam Shankman’s 2007 remake of Hairspray, which raked in more than $200 million worldwide. If you’re over the age of 12 and still have all your faculties intact, or if you’re simply a hardened preteen, then the HSM films may present themselves as the worst kind of teenage wish-fulfillment fantasy. They’re simple, sort of saccharine, and seem to exist in a kind of vacuum-packed, irony-free, alterna-reality that makes Saved by the Bell look almost dystopic. But throughout all the songs and dances and platonic romances, two things have become abundantly clear: 1) that the kids don’t care and love the movies anyhow; and 2) that Zac Efron is a star. Efron radiates a sort of well-scrubbed young mannishness. He’s an entertainer in the most traditional sense of the word: He knows how to carry a tune and turn a step, he winks at the girls and nods at the guys, and he generally appears to be working hard not to disappoint—all of which would seem too good to be true if he didn’t seem to mean it so much. It’s no wonder that his bronzed image—those Hollywood-soulful eyes peering out from under a thick drape of artfully tousled hair—is tacked up in so many lockers, wallpapered on so many iPhones, and emblazoned on so many notebooks and backpacks.

And then Gus and Zac get to talkin’:

GUS VAN SANT: Sorry we couldn’t do this in person.

ZAC EFRON: It’s all good. Where are you right now?

VAN SANT: I’m in Gearhart, Oregon. It’s on the coast outside of Portland. I’m in a beach house.

EFRON: I’ve been to the coast outside of Portland—a couple of times, actually. I might have been where you’re at. I have relatives up there. I think I took a road trip from Portland one time with my aunt, because she lives there. It’s a beautiful place.

VAN SANT: It’s really beautiful here today.

EFRON: It’s pouring in L.A. [laughs]

VAN SANT: So when was the last time that you were in Oregon?

EFRON: Oh, man. It seems like it’s been years. We used to go up there all the time, but I’m stuck in L.A. a lot now.

VAN SANT: Is your schedule today really tight?

EFRON: Not today. I’m not really doing anything. I’m looking at some furniture, because I just got a new place, so I’m figuring out if I want this desk. I’m sitting at it right now. It’s a vintage Herman Miller desk from, like, 1940-something. I don’t know . . . I’m just deciding if I’m going to want it in my house, or if I’m just going to completely wreck it. [laughs] Herman Miller’s stuff is really, really modern, but they have some pretty brilliant designs. [Ed note: Herman Miller is credited with inventing the office cubicle.] I’m sitting at this desk, and it’s the most well-built thing I’ve ever sat at . . . It’s a beautiful piece. It’s got this amazing wood grain that I’ve never seen in any piece of furniture. It’s also a little pricey . . .

VAN SANT: Yeah, those kinds of things are superexpensive, right?

EFRON: Superexpensive. I’m lucky they’re letting me test it out at my place for a couple of days before I have to buy it.

VAN SANT: Oh, the desk is at your house?

EFRON: Yeah. It’s at my house. I’m sitting at it right now. I just bought this place. It’s not big or anything, but it’s a pretty unique space. It’s very modern, very clean, very simple. It’s got concrete floors so I can’t screw it up. I can skateboard inside the house . . . You know, all the essentials are there. I just don’t want to buy nice furniture and then fuck it all up.

VAN SANT: Well, you could put a protective writing pad on the desk. [both laugh] So do you actually skateboard in your house?

EFRON: I have, but now there’s too much stuff around, so it’s getting harder.

VAN SANT: Did you take any pictures for this article already?

EFRON: Yeah, we did.

VAN SANT: How did that go?

EFRON: I think it went pretty cool. There was, like, a giant sandbox in the middle of a studio, and then I just got to roll around in the dirt for a couple of hours. I got pretty dirty by the end of it, so that was fun. It was definitely different from anything I had ever done before. The photographer was really fun to work with . . . He recommended some furniture.

VAN SANT: I wanted to ask you about this Richard Linklater film. Is it Orson and Me?

EFRON: Me and Orson Welles.

VAN SANT: Where did you shoot that?

EFRON: Rick was brilliant, because he found this great theater on the Isle of Man, which, after a little bit of work, looked a whole lot like the Mercury Theatre did in 1937. We took a beautiful theater and made it look rusty and old and dusty, and, once we filled it with extras dressed in 1930s attire, the place was very believable. It even smelled like an old theater. It was pretty neat because we were basically stuck there—you know, we couldn’t leave. There was nowhere to go on the Isle of Man. So we lived in that theater for several weeks. It was fun and exciting, but it was also kind of maddening. I went a little bit insane.

VAN SANT: How old is Orson Welles in your movie?

EFRON: He’s in his mid-twenties, but he’s got the wisdom and the presence of a 50-year-old . . . Well, you know, a 30-year-old guy. [laughs]

VAN SANT: A friend of mine was Welles’s chauffer.

EFRON: Oh, really?

VAN SANT: Yeah. Welles was in his sixties, and he was in L.A. This was in the ’70s. My friend would drive him in some giant 1950s car that was painted turquoise. It was a convertible. The top was always down, and Welles would wear a huge 10-gallon hat and ride in the passenger seat, because I think he liked that people would see him and recognize him. There’s still a movie of his that we haven’t seen. I think it’s called The Other Side of the Wind. I hear it has a bunch of people playing Welles. John Huston plays him at an older age. Peter Bogdanovich plays him at a younger age. It’s his last unfinished film. I don’t know where it is, but I haven’t met anyone who has seen it.

EFRON: That’ll be interesting. People always have such a different way of playing him. They tend to go for the Citizen Kane interpretation.

VAN SANT: When is Me and Orson Welles going to come out?

EFRON: I think some time later this year.

VAN SANT: But before that you have 17 Again.

EFRON: Yeah, I’m getting ready for that.

VAN SANT: Your character in the film is 37 years old, and you’re playing him as a 17-year-old. What was it like playing somebody so much older?

EFRON: At the time, it was the most unique opportunity that presented itself. There were several roles that I could have done where I would have played essentially another high school student, or they were romances or stories in a high school setting, and there were lots of things that people wanted to turn into musicals. But the whole idea of playing a 37-year-old guy as a 17-year-old was just the most exciting prospect for me. I was really intrigued by the idea. I’ve always been kind of an old man, so to speak.

VAN SANT: Was there something that you needed to do, some technique, in order to actually pull that off?

EFRON: Well, I couldn’t really relate to the character in a lot of ways, so I didn’t have that to work from. I worked a lot with Burr [Steers], the director, and Matthew [Perry], and just tried to think in terms of an older guy. He’s experienced life. He’s been through a lot that I haven’t been through yet. So it was a big change from High School Musical. You know, I’ve fallen in love, and I’ve not known what I want to do with my own future—I still don’t know. But I’ve never had a daughter who I’m looking out for. I’ve never been proud of my son. I’ve never gotten a divorce. It was interesting trying to figure that out. It was definitely a change of pace. And it was great working with Burr, because he’s got this huge imagination, and this sense of people—not what they seem to be, or what they’re defined to be, or what they want to appear to be, but as they actually are.

The rest of the online version of this interview can be read HERE but the full text of the interview can only be read in the mag. To be honest, I still have a hard time taking Zac Efron serious … at all. He’s deffo no Daniel Radcliffe who, even at his young age, has proven time and time again that he has the acting chops to really be a force to be reckoned with in Hollywood’s future. Zac still strikes me as the overly coiffed prettyboy that will get cast in throwaway movies until he no longer manages to attract his young teenage girl audience. There’s never been a project that Efron has been attached to that I felt compelled to see. Even when he tries to act grown up, I’m not buying it. After the jump, check out one more NSFW photo of Zac from this issue of Interview — he’s posing with a fully nekkid woman lying on top of him …

READ THE REST OF THIS POST »

Jenna Jameson Gives Birth To Twin Boys

Hell, everyone's having twins these days
Monday, March 16th, 2009

Congratulations are in order for porn star extraordinaire Jenna Jameson and her former Ultimate Fighting champ babydaddy Tito Ortiz today … US Weekly is reporting that Jenna gave birth to the couple’s twin boys earlier this morning … at this point, no names have been released:


Adult film star Jenna Jameson and her boyfriend of two years, Tito Ortiz, welcomed twin boys Monday morning, her rep confirms to Usmagazine.com. “They’re in very good health,” her rep tells Us. “She’s been taking it easy and even had to be in a wheelchair during one of Tito’s events in Las Vegas,” a source told Us when Jameson was just shy of eight months pregnant. “She’s very excited to be a mom.” Back in May, Jameson told Us, “We’re trying for a baby, so hopefully in the next couple of months!” By the end of August, she confirmed her pregnancy to Us exclusively, saying, “I’m so happy!” Upon finding out she was pregnant, Jameson, 34, admitted that she and Ortiz, a mixed martial arts fighter, were in a state of shock. “I’m just staying super healthy,” she said. “I’ve moved down to the beach with Tito — I love being by the beach.” Being able to give birth to two healthy babies is joyful for Jameson, a self-proclaimed devout Catholic.

Dang, doesn’t it seem like it’s become the norm for celebs to be giving birth to twin babies? Doesn’t anyone ever have single babies anymore? HMMM … guess not. In any event, much love and congrats goes out to Jenna and Tito on the birth of their baby boys. After Jenna suffered her miscarriage back in 2004 after she was diagnosed with malignant melanoma, I’m sure she dreamed for the day she would be able to give birth to healthy babies. I wish her nothing but love and happiness … and a long life with her baby boys. Congrats!!

[Source]

More Photos Of Robert Pattinson In ‘GQ’ Magazine Have Surfaced

Outtakes ahead
Monday, March 16th, 2009

Last Thursday we got our first look at Twilight star Robert Pattinson on the cover and in the pages of the new issue of GQ magazine … and all the hawt photos that have been published in the new issue. Today, we get to check out a few outtake photos that were shot during R. Pattz’s GQ photoshoot but were not included for publication:


All of these outtake photos are in black and white and feature a very sad-looking Rob. Homie looks like he’s on the verge of tears — he also looks like he is in desperate need of a hug. After the jump, check out the rest of the GQ outtake photos and see Rob’s sad puppy face …

READ THE REST OF THIS POST »

‘The Sci-Fi Channel’ To Become ‘SyFy’

Meh.
Monday, March 16th, 2009

The Sci-Fi Channel, which is home to the amazing TV original series Battlestar Galactica (which ends its series run this coming Friday night) and reruns of classic shows like Star Trek: The Next Generation, Quantum Leap, Dark Angel, Dead Like Me, Firefly and more, is about to undergo a huge change. In July, the NBC owned network is going to change its name from The Sci-Fi Channel to merely SyFy … complete with a new motto (Imagine Greater) and a new logo which looks like this:


After 16 years, Sci Fi Channel is changing its name … unless you say it aloud. NBC Universal-owned cable network will become “Syfy” starting in July. The phonics-friendly moniker is part a network-wide rebranding campaign that’s been in the works for more than a year. It’s an evolution also includes a more down-to-earth logo and an uplifting tagline – “Imagine Greater” – and will be announced Monday at the network’s upfront presentation to advertisers. The changes attempt to address some longtime marketing goals at the network, as well as some practical challenges that having stemmed from trying to use a generic term as a brand name. “We love being sci fi and we’re still embracing that,” said network president Dave Howe on Friday. “But we’re more than just space and aliens and the future – the three things most people think of when they think of ’sci fi.’” Though at first blush more fantastical-looking than the current name, SyFy aims to telegraph that the channel is unique destination without being so different from the current title as to lose the network’s core familiarity. “What this does is hopefully give us the best of both worlds,” Howe said. “You keep the heritage, but also open up to a broader range of content.” For years the network has sought ways to expand its image beyond its signature male-skewing space operas such as “Stargate” and “Battlestar Galactica.” The network will unveil the branding campaign this summer along with the premiere of “Warehouse 13,” about two FBI agents who hunt down paranormal objects. Next year’s “Battlestar” prequel “Caprica,” which is a terrestrial-based drama rather than an outer-space adventure, is also considered to support this brand expansion, an effort that really began on the programming side a few years ago with the launch of drama “Eureka,” about a town of geniuses. Sci Fi’s logo is also getting a makeover. The current purple Saturn image will be retired. In its place is the name SyFy raised against a light-taupe wall. While the tagline “Imagine Greater” prods the reader to reconsider the boundaries of the channel and pushes inspirational liftoff. Yet for all the talk of audience messaging, there’s a very pragmatic side to this whole endeavor too. From a business affairs standpoint, the network’s genre-as-title has long been cumbersome. “We’re going to have upwards of 50 Sci Fi Channels in various territories and yet you cannot trademark ‘Sci Fi’ anywhere in the world,” Howe said. “A new logo design would not solve that particular challenge. We needed a brand name that was own-able, portable and extendable.” Having generic name is also difficult when trying to build a brand online. Business have discovered that even having a strange or misspelled name (such as Digg or Fark) is preferable to having a familiar name that could be confused with something else, or would make it difficult for users to find information about your company’s products when using a search engine. “The channel has been around for 16 years and the world has changed in 16 years,” Howe said. “Everybody had to watch as a linear channel, you didn’t have downloading and you didn’t have international channels around the globe.” Howe knows some fans will dislike the change and see Syfy as a rejection of the network’s core viewership. More than most channels, Sci Fi has a intense relationship with its audience. Clashes are unavoidable to some degree when you combine a network making businesses-minded decisions with a genre that has the most passionate and outspoken fans around. “Our core audience will use it an opportunity to question our motives — they always do,” Howe said. “But what we’re embracing is the total sci-fi landscape – fantasy, paranormal, action-adventure, mystery … it’s imagination-based entertainment.”

It’s an interesting idea, clearly borne of a business model that says a change like this is necessary to move forward. As a regular viewer, tho, it seems like much ado about nothing. I actually prefer the original spelling of the name and the purple logo. Altho the channel airs more than just sci-fi programming, I thought the umbrella name really worked well … for the last 16 years. Rebranding can be a tricky thing … but I’m sure the network will make it thru OK. The fact that there is even a market for a sci-fi channel is very exciting to me. As long as SyFy keeps coming at us with brilliant programming like Battlestar Galactica (and looking ahead to Caprica, it looks like it plans to do just that) then I’ll keep tuning in … no matter what the network is called.

[Source, Source]

New Bride Gisele Bündchen Takes New Hubby Tom Brady Home To Brazil

Meetin' the extended family
Monday, March 16th, 2009

After about 3 weeks of happily married bliss, Brazilian supermodel Gisele Bündchen and new hubby Tom Brady made their way down to her home country so that she could introduce him to members of her family that he had yet to meet. While at the airport, the lovey dovey newlyweds couldn’t keep their hands off of one another (and it’s amazing how sweet photos of Gisele and Tom kissing are as opposed to, say, photos of Paris Hilton and Doug Reinhardt kissing … but, I digress) … here are a few pics:


Newlyweds Gisele Bündchen and Tom Brady got in some sweet treats and family time over the weekend. The couple flew to Brazil, where Bündchen is from, so Brady could meet some of his new wife’s family members he hasn’t met before, according to a source. Plus, the couple helped Bündchen’s grandfather celebrate his 83rd birthday in the southern Brazilian city of Horizontina, the local newspaper Zero Hora reports. Brady, 31, and Bündchen, 28, who got married last month in a small ceremony in Santa Monica, Calif., also enjoyed some ice cream and toured the city. Brady, the quarterback for the New England Patriots, was spotted exercising at a local gym.

Awww … so glad that the couple could make the trek down to visit Gisele’s grandpappy … at 83, I’m sure he appreciated it as well. True to form, the couple have generally been keeping a low profile since their secret wedding … perhaps this Brazilian vacay will be a sort of extended honeymoon for the lovebirds. Cute!!

[Photo credit: X17; Source]

‘The Last House’ Is Better Left Alone

The TV Guide
Monday, March 16th, 2009

After spending most of yesterday cooped up in my office going thru bank statements and credit card receipts, I was really lookin’ to get out of the house by the time I finished sorting all of my paperwork. David and Kurt (who is staying with us for a few days) were talking about going to see a movie so I thought that would be the best, low-key option. They decided on seeing The Last House on the Left and, since I’m a big horror movie fan, I decided to go along …


… and what a mistake that was. Honestly, I was pretty revolted by the entire movie. I had a real hard time finding any entertainment value in any of it. I also had a hard time seeing the flick as a “horror” film … to me, it was simply a horrible film. The Last House on the Left is a remake of the 1970’s version of the film that takes horror porn to a new level. For the first portion of the film, the viewer is subjected to close-up shots of a teenage girl’s maturing body repeatedly before we are forced to watch her get raped and shot in the woods (that is, after her female friend is beat up, tied up and stabbed in the stomach and in the back). I haven’t been that uncomfortable in a theater in a very long time. There is NO REASON for the film to focus so much on this young girl’s rape … I was so close to walking out. Only the promise of the retribution to come kept me in my seat. As the movie progressed, the parents of the raped girl are allowed to exact their revenge on the people who harmed their daughter … which is where the garbage disposal and the microwave come in handy. I’m sorry, even seeing the bad guys get punished for their heinous crimes did not satisfy me. At the end of the film, I felt disgusted and a bit violated for having witnessed the brutality on the screen. There was nothing scary about this film, it was just disgusting. A movie like The Strangers did it better … there was suspense and actual horror without all the gore. Even the gore I don’t mind so much … but the brutality of rape for entertainment purposes has no business being on screen. Had I known about that scene, I would’ve opted out of seeing the film in the first place. I simply cannot endorse or suggest that others see this film. Tho, considering what I read about the brutality in the original film … it sounds like they cleaned up this remake.

Blah!!!

Tonight, Kurt leaves us for a while so David and I will have our last night together before I leave for SXSW tomorrow evening. Not sure what the plan is but I’m sure we’ll think of something ;)

Les News, 031609

Lindsay unwanted, Jen dumped John, Obama to visit 'The Tonight Show'
Monday, March 16th, 2009