selam genclik bugun size

porno

nedir anlatacagim artik porno bir abaza isi olarak gorulmemektedir cunku xvideos da sinirsiz sikis izlenir ve izledikleriniz sadece siz deil gizlesene olup abazaligin sinirini zorlayarak liseli sikis videolarimizla götten sikiş seksin sinirlarini zorlamak mumkundur ve ayrica en kaliteli olan redtube videolarinide sizler icin koyduk ve asla unutmayin adult izle, porno izle, sikis izle adreslerimiz sizler icin hizmet vermektedir rus pornosu kalitenin dorugu burdadir pornogiller eger olurda kutunel ararsaniz onu da bizde bulabilirsiniz rokettube sizler icin hepberaber izleyelim. The Olsen Twins Have Their Walk Of Fame Star Defaced! | Pink is the New Blog
Jan 25, 2009
The Olsen Twins Have Their Walk Of Fame Star Defaced!
Oh, the horror!

It would seem that PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) has not eased up on their crusade against Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen‘s love of wearing fur. The twins are protested against by the animal rights group at public events but it appears that that is no longer enough. The twins’ star (along with that of Sharon Stone) on the Hollywood Walk of Fame has been defaced with the epithet FUR HAGS! … behold:


Stars of actresses Sharon Stone, Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen on the Hollywood Walk of Fame have been smudged with the words “FUR HAGS!” by anti-fur campaigners. While Stone’s star, received in November 1995, was smeared with “OLD FUR HAG!”, the actress twins’ shared marker bared the words “FUR HAGS!”, reports the Daily Express. Many other celebrities, including Gwyneth Paltrow, Socialite Khloe Kardashian have previously found themselves at the centre of controversies for wearing fur. Activists supporting People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) have been on their feet to discourage the use of fur and protest against the torture inflicted on animals under the name of fashion. And it has been commonplace to observe anti-fur demonstrations outside the A-listers’ signings and public appearances.

In addition to referring to the Olsens as Fur Hags, the animal rights group also refers to them as the Trollsen Twins … going so far as to set up a website where folks can play dress up with ghastly cartoon-versions of the girls on the site:

Dress Up The Trollsen Twins!

It is NOT absolutely certain that PETA had anything at all to do with the defacement of these stars on the Walk of Fame but, judging by the term FUR HAGS!, it’s likely. At the very least, the grafitti was done by a PETA/animal rights sympathizer … or mebbe just a hater.

[Source, Source]

Like PITNB on Facebook
Share
39
Tagged: , , , News

Posted By: Trent

39 Comments. Add Yours

1 2
  1. debho says:
    January 25, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    I hate PETA. More than that, I hate people who deface public property. Graffitiists and vandals are just scum. People who choose to wear fur, sorry, but that’s their choice. No worse than wearing those horrible CROC shoes IMO.

    Reply
    Flag?
  2. nicole says:
    January 25, 2009 at 12:57 pm

    PETA has to be the worst organization out there. they take things to far & act like a bunch of kids. all the protest they do..doesnt really get the point across..it just seems to piss everyone off. how can the expect people to take them seriously if they cant gain any respect?

    Reply
    Flag?
  3. Felicia says:
    January 25, 2009 at 1:09 pm

    This is really ridiculous and PETA always goes too far :(.

    Reply
    Flag?
  4. Samantha says:
    January 25, 2009 at 1:15 pm

    that is just ridiculous! last time i checked this was the united states…it’s a free country! they can wear what they want. yes peta can say and do things that they want but they take things a little too far. such as defacing things that these people have earned and throwing flour on lindsay lohan. they really let their stupidity shine! i hate people like that…if you don’t think the way they do, you’re wrong. not everybody is going to agree with you peta! get over it!

    Reply
    Flag?
  5. Aislin says:
    January 25, 2009 at 1:35 pm

    It’s pathetic. I’m sorry but wearing fur is a CHOICE. I personally don’t agree with it, I wouldn’t wear fur… but I wear leather boots. Does that make me a murderer? Defacing someone’s well earned hollywood star is just immaturity at its peak. Everyone has their own opinion

    Reply
    Flag?
  6. Kay says:
    January 25, 2009 at 4:51 pm

    PETA is being really childish. I get the ‘no wear fur thing’ but this is so immature.

    Reply
    Flag?
  7. pooneck says:
    January 25, 2009 at 6:43 pm

    lame to damage or deface someone’s property to attempt to prove a point. kinda like the naked girl’s that were up here in wisconsin, naked, covered with sandwich boards at KFC, to protest the cruel treatment of chickens when it was literally below zero. i mean use some common sense. prove your point in an intelligent way.

    Reply
    Flag?
  8. sykosoo says:
    January 25, 2009 at 6:48 pm

    [sarcastic clap] “fur hags” defacement will surely get peta the serious media attention it deserves.

    tmz? are you ON THIS?! top storyyyy…

    Reply
    Flag?
  9. bip says:
    January 25, 2009 at 7:04 pm

    I didn’t realize they shared a single star, that seems like a slap in the face itself, no?

    Anyhow, I think they are cool for continuing to wear fur.

    Reply
    Flag?
  10. Joanne says:
    January 25, 2009 at 9:49 pm

    Did anyone see the number of celebrities proudly wearing fur at the inauguration?? … Say and think what you like about PETA’s style, but fur has crept back into the western world AGAIN, because people have become lazy about the cause and don’t want to think about the gross-ness behind where that fur came from.
    I’m not a fan of PETA – but who else is drawing attention to this cause – in a way that people (of the pop culture obsessed generation) will pay attention??

    Reply
    Flag?
  11. meg says:
    January 26, 2009 at 2:46 am

    i completely suppor tnot wearing fur and PETA, but graffiti and defamanition of public propert yis dusgusting and also illegal. that is pathetic PETA.

    Reply
    Flag?
  12. wendell says:
    January 26, 2009 at 5:46 am

    PETA edges closer and closer to being a terrorist organization every year. They are fanatical idiots with no regard for HUMAN life. If you don’t like wearing fur, DON’T WEAR IT. Nobody is saying you have to. What a bunch of morons.

    Reply
    Flag?
  13. Project Samuel says:
    January 26, 2009 at 6:51 am

    I hate PETA… they need to leave people alone!

    Reply
    Flag?
  14. John says:
    January 26, 2009 at 8:39 am

    Why is everyone blaming PETA for this? They shouldn’t assume PETA is behind this. PETA would never condone such behavior!

    Reply
    Flag?
  15. CB says:
    January 26, 2009 at 9:58 am

    I’m anti-fur, but I’m also pro-freedom and a personal choice is just that. PETA is pretty immature and sensationalistic, in my opinion.

    Reply
    Flag?
  16. ackeegirl says:
    January 26, 2009 at 10:54 am

    i LOVE how PETA is all “save the animals” but is totally using crazy sexist language and imagery…i mean, how hard is it to go after them for their fur wearing? Is the rest that necessary? or effective? I always said that PETA’s biggest backers are straight white guys because then they can play the hero for victims that can’t talk back to them.

    Reply
    Flag?
  17. MeGs says:
    January 26, 2009 at 1:07 pm

    Shouldn’t PETA be out saving some animals rather than wasting time making fake websites about the Olsen Twins?? pathetic! They aren’t the only ones wearing fur, so move on and do some REAL work!!

    Reply
    Flag?
  18. DMac says:
    January 28, 2009 at 10:06 am

    I don’t understand how anyone can support PeTA and the efforts they make to try to turn people off wearing fur, eating meat, and whatever else they do. They use news stories for their own selfish, insensitive, inappropriate gain (e.g. the Robert Pickton case, where they tried to compare the murder scene to a pig farm and support their anti-pig-farming campaign) and look like jerks doing it, and now they’re calling fish ‘sea kittens’ in order to get people to stop eating fish.

    PeTA is definitely not getting any respect from me after seeing this ad campaign.

    Reply
    Flag?
  19. Jean Houston says:
    August 22, 2009 at 12:03 am

    28.Jean Houston:
    August 22nd, 2009 at 1:47 am Look this is about the killing of innocent animals(many while they are still alive because they can rip their skin (fur) off easier if the body is warm. You want to know why people are angry? Well take a look. No really do it.Get the real story.Look on utube. The killing,drowning,beating,electrocution, stomping on their heads. The olsen twin are part of the fur trade. They use it in their clothing line. Your telling me that defacting a slab of concrete is more inportant than the olsens condoning the killing of cats,dogs, racoons,and many others? Think about this.These 2 act like they are roll models. Yes Roll models for the killing of INNOCENT animals!Stop and think about what you are saying.Got a cat or a dog?, well the olsen twins would greatly appreciate if you would skin your pet for their new fashion line. Please do it while they are alive because they would like a seamless design.
    Megs, You don’t understand? The olsen twins wear fur all the time. You don’t understand? Please see for yourself. utube fur trade china

    Reply
    Flag?
1 2

Leave a Reply

It's easier to leave comments when you register for an account, where you can also select your own profile photo. Already have a PITNB account? Then sign in.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.