Nekkid Madonna Up For Auction
Earlier today we got to see the first image of Madonna posing with Brazilian model (and rumored romantic fling) Jesus Luz from the upcoming W magazine photospread shot by Steven Klein … and now we get to see a bit more of Madonna than we are used to seeing these days. Christie’s Auction House in NYC is offering up two original photographs of Madonna that were shot 30 years ago back before she became the pop music icon we know now. Both photos are expected to fetch at least $10,000 at auction but one of the photos is getting a bit more attention … photographed by Lee Friedlander, the extra special photo features Maddy in full nekkid repose:
Two photographs of Madonna set to appear in a Christie’s auction next month will probably sell for at least $10,000 each, according to estimates posted on the company’s Web site. One, a full-frontal nude black-and-white photograph of the singer, was taken in 1979 by celebrated American photographer Lee Friedlander for a series of nudes he was working on, said Milena Sales, a spokeswoman for the auction house. Madonna was about 20 when the photograph, one of several, was taken. A handful from the shoot appeared in Playboy magazine in 1985, Sales said. Christie’s put price estimates for the photograph at $10,000 to $15,000. The second photograph of Madonna was taken in the 1980s by Helmut Newton. In the Newton photograph, which is in color, Madonna is wearing a short dress and black stockings with garters. The circumstances behind the photo shoot were not immediately clear. The auction will take place in New York on February 12.
After the jump, check out a larger size version of the 20-year old nekkid photo of Madonna that is up for auction at Christie’s that is said to fetch at least $10,000 when it goes on sale next month …
Okay … if you’re REALLY sure that you want to see this photo in its full, uncensored NSFW glory than click above to see it. Be warned, Madonna was not all that into shaving back when this photo was taken … if you check out the uncensored image, you’ll see what I’m talking about.
If YOU are interested in participating in next month’s auction and would like further information on how YOU can bid on this photograph, click HERE to visit the Christie’s Auction House website for all the deets. I, for one, will just stick to the Steven Klein W mag photos and will leave the nekkid Madonna pics for other, more interested folks. How much would YOU pay to own this nekkid photo of Madonna?
Tags: 'Hard Candy', Madonna, Steven Klein
RSS
Feedburner
January 17th, 2009 at 11:29 am
OMG! in the first photos i didn’t recognize her …she looks amazing and 2 decades younger!
January 17th, 2009 at 11:31 am
…and her hips/thighs/butt look a bit fuller and more womanly – amazing!
January 17th, 2009 at 11:33 am
ok..i just looked at the censored photo….TONS of pubic hair (holy hairy cow!) and huge inner labia lips….wow…too much information!
January 17th, 2009 at 11:43 am
i like the first set of pics..like yogagirl said.. she looks years younger
January 17th, 2009 at 11:45 am
does nobody else on the planet think Madonna is just plain GROSS?? She is 50 years old and can’t keep her legs closed for one stink’n photo. She is waaayy to be old to be sexy anymore. I think she is nasty.
that other photo of her naked…yikes!! Just looks unsanitary!
January 17th, 2009 at 12:09 pm
Wow…Madonna’s got an amazing body! I wish I could spend the 9.5 hours a day I am at work just working out to look like that. Seriously! I love her legs! Craziness…I don’t think sexiness has an age limit. Look at Sophia Loren!
The pictures she chose were obviously the best ones. :) But, I like the double eyebrow shot! As for the nude shot…mmm…sadly, I can relate. I was lost at one point, too!
January 17th, 2009 at 12:13 pm
arm pit hair
January 17th, 2009 at 12:16 pm
I liked the naked shot.
so hot!
January 17th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
i think i just puked in my mouth. that is disgusting.
January 17th, 2009 at 12:42 pm
i so agree with nae – puking in my mouth seriously! i feel better about my body already!
January 17th, 2009 at 12:45 pm
Um what?!!! What is with the arm pit hair? Ugh. Gross!
January 17th, 2009 at 12:47 pm
NAIR
January 17th, 2009 at 1:09 pm
meh…. I’ve seen better ; D
January 17th, 2009 at 1:10 pm
i think she looks super hot in the “pre-Madonna” pic. those are some beautiful breasts.
January 17th, 2009 at 1:23 pm
1979 is 30 years ago.
January 17th, 2009 at 1:28 pm
Ewww… Thats all I can say. Hair in the pits, legs and the gina! Ewww… Take care of that shit.
January 17th, 2009 at 1:56 pm
Did razors not exist when she took this picture…ewwwwww :(
January 17th, 2009 at 2:02 pm
Maybe major pube hair was the rage back in the 70s, what’s the deal with all the ewwws? Anyway, I agree with AmyM, M had some beautiful breasts back in the day.
January 17th, 2009 at 2:12 pm
I’m not going to say anything about the hair because you guys all did it already =)
But Lourdes looks so much like her ! It’s crazy !!!
January 17th, 2009 at 2:15 pm
i really don’t like madonna.. i never will..
especially after seeing this..
disgusting..
January 17th, 2009 at 2:33 pm
Great boobs! What’s with the wildabeast growing out of her na-na???
January 17th, 2009 at 2:35 pm
Umm, there is nothing wrong with pubic hair, there’s a reason we have it. It’s not unsanitary, and it’s not gross. The popularity of the hairless look is really only fairly recent anyway. While a complete lack of grooming isn’t particularly aesthetically pleasing, neither is a complete lack of hair.
January 17th, 2009 at 2:56 pm
her nipples are so tiny and gross… not to mention the forest she’s growing down there… yay the 70s.
January 17th, 2009 at 2:56 pm
I second what Traci said. It was a different time when people didn’t feel like they needed to get rid of every single hair on their bodies to be sexy. Check out Playboy from that time and all the ladies have got “Power Muffs,” lol.
January 17th, 2009 at 3:26 pm
OMG look at the arm pit hair!!!
January 17th, 2009 at 4:54 pm
Okay, so I’m showing my age here, but I remember those shots in Playboy way back when. She’s just a few years older than me….guess which one of us grew older more gracefully.
BTW, I never had all of that hair everywhere, even in the 70’s. No one did in fact. She was just skanky. Some things never change.
January 17th, 2009 at 5:45 pm
OMG… im shocked… i became more gay than iam.. but i gotta say nice boobs… n_n
January 17th, 2009 at 6:02 pm
While I’m a fan of shaving, it’s dismaying to see so many people calling this “gross”. I agree with those who have commented and pointed out how unnatural our fixation on having absolutely no body hair is.
January 17th, 2009 at 6:05 pm
Without considering the pubic hair and her recent and over the top muscle growth, this pic just reafirms my belief that Madonna has always had one of the best natural bodies ever!!
January 17th, 2009 at 8:11 pm
I really don’t get what’s wrong with pubic hair. What concerns me more is the weird look on her face here in the spread legged pic. What’s that about?
January 17th, 2009 at 8:20 pm
why are people yelling gross at body hair? are you all 10 years old? i agree with annie. i shave but i prefer body hair over looking like a little girl.
January 17th, 2009 at 8:44 pm
“BTW, I never had all of that hair everywhere, even in the 70’s. No one did in fact. She was just skanky. Some things never change.”
People did, and still do, have body hair everywhere. For some it’s fine, for others it’s coarse, dark, and thick. Some shave, some trim, some just don’t touch it. And the amount of body hair that one has does NOT make them skanky.
And I’m glad some other people who agree with me read this and spoke up. =)
January 17th, 2009 at 9:08 pm
Not only was she not into shaving her pubes, it looks likes she wasn’t into shaving her pits either.
January 17th, 2009 at 9:50 pm
I didnt even notice how attractive her rack was because I was busy being blinded by the vast array of hair in the crack of @ss and arm pits. This picture looks like 70’s porn. Nice placements of stars Trent. lol
January 17th, 2009 at 10:07 pm
I don’t get what the big deal about the hair is. I mean..its hair. Most of you have some on your head, don’t you? So what if its placement is in private areas…ITS JUST HAIR. Get over yourselves.
January 17th, 2009 at 11:55 pm
thats really gross..who would want to buy a photo of an unshaved madonna? would you like to see a national forest?
January 18th, 2009 at 3:06 am
Traci, I was mainly referring to her armpits and legs. Most women have been defuzzing for years. And as I said, I remember that Playboy article and even then most people…especially the men….hated all of that hair. Besides, hairy pits do tend to smell and that’s offensive. How much pubic hair you have is a matter of choice, but it’s pretty gross when there’s hair hanging out of your bathing suit. Keeping it trimmed is just good grooming. Most women worry about their hairstyle, why wouldn’t you worry about the rest of your hair?
I didn’t mean that having hair makes you skanky, I just think Madonna is. Always have done, always will. Just my opinion. Like always.
January 18th, 2009 at 3:57 am
In 1979 she was only 21…if she were 30, she’d be turning 60 this year instead of 51.
And seriously, who cares about some body hair?
January 18th, 2009 at 5:55 am
Damn… I thought I had a lot of hair.
January 18th, 2009 at 6:16 am
As a straight male, I find the photo very pleasant, even with the hair. I actually prefer hair over tattoos anyday. Someone wrote “hairy pits do tend to smell”, I think the key is washing each day. She looked wonderful back then… not if she would just cover up and fitting into her role as a 50 year old mother of three.
January 18th, 2009 at 8:23 am
Some of these comments are an example of how Gen Y and Z have been brainwashed … Having hair on the body is a personal choice and has nothing to do with personal hygiene. Sadly society only gets to see women with breast implants, surgically altered genitals and bodies bald as a pre-pubescent girls … so when they see a picture like this, they are shocked and say “ewww” … SAD.
January 18th, 2009 at 9:11 am
@Janet — the photos are 30 year old, not that she was 30 when they were taken :)
January 18th, 2009 at 10:05 am
@ deb
Ah, gotcha. It does make more sense talking about armpit hair. I still don’t think it’s all that unhygienic or smelly to have hairy pits, most guys still don’t shave there, and it’s only when they don’t put on deodorant that it’s a bit smelly.
January 18th, 2009 at 11:21 am
there’s no age limit on sexiness but there is one if you’re madonna. i just died inside.
January 18th, 2009 at 12:41 pm
Oh. My. God. The sight of this – hands down – hairiest crotch in the universe is going to haunt my dreams for the rest of my days. *shudders*
Poor Guy Ritchie. I hope to God she shaves.
January 18th, 2009 at 2:02 pm
@ Traci. Women seem to have a different type of body odour to men. Way back when I had a couple of female friends who decided they were going hippy and didn’t shave. They really did have bad BO. When they “grew out” of that phase (lol), and they started shaving again, they didn’t smell. I know not everyone does and a lot of the time it’s down to personal hygiene, but really, it doesn’t even look nice. For men it’s natural. I guess that’s a double standard eh? I like men a little hairy, yet like women to be nicely groomed.
January 18th, 2009 at 5:02 pm
They might not have used deodorant either, I know a lot of hippies don’t because of the chemicals in it. Just like it’s gross when a guy doesn’t use it, hairy or not.
Personally, I don’t see how anyone who did shave could just stop, I can’t shave my pits every day, but more than a couple of days the stubble is really painful. I suppose if you get to a certain point, the hair is long and soft enough that it’s comfortable, but getting to that point? Nah.
January 18th, 2009 at 7:45 pm
whoever buys this should be admitted to a mental institution. why the hell would you want this in your home? or even in your thoughts for that matter.
January 18th, 2009 at 9:18 pm
@ Traci….especially as we live Down Under…the heat and hairy armpits do not go well together. lol
January 18th, 2009 at 9:25 pm
God, SHAVE! :(
January 19th, 2009 at 5:38 am
gosh the hairy pits are gross i dont care what decade it was!
January 20th, 2009 at 7:07 pm
she didnt shave her armpits!! :S
February 13th, 2009 at 12:54 pm
First off I think her breasts look awesome as does the rest of her body. I don’t like all the hair; pubic, underarms and legs are not shaved. Oh well Im sure she has since changed her grooming habits.
February 13th, 2009 at 5:02 pm
[...] Madge And Her Jungle-fied Vadge Up For Sale—–PITNB [...]