Jan 22, 2009
Dakota Fanning To Join The Cast Of ‘Twilight’ Sequel ‘New Moon’?
Set to play the cherubic vampire Jane?

Hold on to your hats, Twilighters. A couple of weeks ago we learned from trusted sources (actress Ashley Green [who played Alice Cullen in Twilight] talking to People magazine, MTVNews) that High School Musical star Vanessa Hudgens had auditioned for the role of Leah Clearwater in the upcoming Twilight sequel New Moon. That news sent shockwaves thru the Twilightverse and was a source of much strife among fans of the Twilight Saga. Today we have more casting news … and it might cause the same sort of reaction from fans. The absolutely reliable Marc Malkin, of E! News, is reporting exclusively that Dakota Fanning is in talks to play Jane (one of the main vampire characters from the European Volturi clan). Even more surprising, I think, is that the report claims that Dakota didn’t even have to audition for the role … she was merely offered the part and both sides are now in negotiations to see if they can seal the deal. Be warned! The following report may contain spoilers for those of you who have yet to read the Twilight books:


Dakota Fanning…with fangs? It’s possible. I can exclusively report that the 14-year-old child star—she turns 15 on Feb. 23—is in talks to play Jane opposite Robert Pattinson & Co. in New Moon, the upcoming sequel to box office megahit Twilight. “There were no auditions,” a source reveals. “They just offered it to her outright, and now they’re in negotiations. They’ve been going back and forth.” Jane is a member of Italy’s Volturi, the most deadly group of bloodsucking killers in author Stephenie Meyer’s best-selling series. In the casting notice we got our hands on earlier this month, Jane is described as a petite blonde with a “Botticelli angel-like face…[and] crimson irises.” While fellow Volturi guards Demetri & Felix “are three times the size of her, they are terrified of her,” the casting notice reads. Coincidentally (or maybe not), an online petition started by a Twilight fan already asks the studio, Summit Entertainment, to cast Fanning because she would be “perfect” for the role. Early last month, Entertainment Weekly suggested Pushing Daisies star and Broadway diva Kristin Chenoweth. “Her voice is certainly high enough, and at 4’11”, she’s also short enough,” writer Amy Wilkinson proposed. Director Chris Weitz is expected to start shooting New Moon in March in the U.S. and Italy. If all goes as planned, the movie will hit theaters on Nov. 20.

I suppose we can forgive Malkin for thinking that the vampires in Twilight have fangs … but I absolutely believe his reporting on this casting news. He is very much in the know about these things and he is not one to post unsubstantiated information just to get attention. Whether or not Dakota gets the part remains to be seen but, it sounds like the role is hers if she wants it. I hadn’t considered Kristin Chenoweth as Jane … she’s prolly a bit too old to play the part but Malkin is right, she is short enough. I know that many Twilight fans were really upset at the prospect of Hudgens joining the cast of New Moon … but mebbe Fanning will be better received because it’s feasible that her casting sprang from an online petition started by a fan? What do y’all think? Is Dakota right for the part of Jane? Would you like to see her get the part?

[Source]

Like PITNB on Facebook

77 Comments. Add Yours

1 2 3 4
  1. Joe says:

    She would be a perfect Jane! I adore her.
    I hope she does it.
    Hopefully they film Eclipse and Breaking Dawn right after though because a 15 year old girl can age quickly and a Vampire shouldn’t at all.

  2. SpecialK says:

    I think Dakota is a great actress and should be able to play the part no sweat.

  3. Jenn says:

    I think it’s great! I think a lot of people see Dakota as this sweet and innocent actress, which she is, but don’t you guys remember Hide and Seek?! She can do the dark and creepy role just as well as the sweet and innocent!

  4. Heather says:

    I think she’d be fine.. that’s pretty much how I picture Jane to look.

  5. Tiffany says:

    She’s too old/tall for Jane IMO :-/ But her looks are good for it. Dang!

  6. Mckenzie says:

    15 years old? So by the time they get around to filming Breaking Dawn (if they do) she’ll be how old? The casting people know that’s around the age when our appearance changes the most, right?

  7. Tracy says:

    Shed be great. Dakota owns.

  8. nicole says:

    HAHA! i think she’d be awesome as jane.

  9. sarah w says:

    I have seen many movies dakota has been in and I think shed be great shes very versitile, while she may not be exactly what we imagined she fits the bill, angelic, small, yet demented, ever seen hide n seek? im sure she could do it, i hope she gets the part, i dont want some old lady doing it, then id be pissed, u forget these vampires are beautiful, and perfect someone younger is better off playing jane rather than some old person.

  10. Siddy says:

    Dakota… Don’t do it… I’d lose some of my respect for her if she did.

  11. M3 says:

    I think Dakota will be great as Jane. She’s how I pictured the young cherub-looking Jane. My concern is she’ll likely out-act the others and make them look bad. Hopefully having her on the cast will raise the bar for the others.

  12. Patty says:

    OMG… Dakota would be absolutely perfect for that role I think! I know she’s supposed to look younger than 15, but I think Dakota still does. I can’t see any actor much younger pulling off everything Jane has to.

  13. Danielle says:

    Ooo wow, she’d make an amazing Jane!

  14. Ashley says:

    I think Dakota would be fine…for now. But as other people said she will continue to age and change–which Stephenie Meyer’s vamps don’t do.
    I always pictured Amanda Seyfried from Big Love and Mama Mia.

  15. shazz says:

    I’d love to see her as Jane in New Moon tbh..

  16. Lola says:

    I can’t say I’m against her playing Jane but it’s not how I pictured here. She may fit the height but I understood Jane to be an adult, not a teenager.

  17. wow… what a perfect way to turn twilight into even MORE of a teeny-bopper movie. I love dakota, think she’s adorable and a great actress- but twilight does not need a big name teen. when is summit gonna WAKE UP and realize that twilight doesn’t have to be a young teen movie? the books are good enough that there are MILLIONS of people outside of the ‘typical demographic’ in love with the stories. Plus.. we have MONEY… cater to us!! i’m hoping that the big wigs at summit and chris weitz (b/c i know they read your blog, duh) will listen to me, then cast Kristin Chenoweth like EW suggested, make DOUBLE what they did on twilight and give me Rob pattinson to have my way with as my reward.:)
    letterstotwilight.com

  18. Nina says:

    I don’t think Dakota would work she is a little too old but doesn’t she have a younger sister named Elle? she is also and actress and i think she would work for the part a little bit better than Dakota would

  19. Elaine says:

    oh my god.. when I was reading the books, i imagined dakota fanning in my head as jane and later thought “it would be funny if they cast her in the movies”…whoa!
    i think she would be perfect!

  20. Lisa says:

    I could totally see her as playing Jane.

1 2 3 4

Leave a Reply

It's easier to leave comments when you register for an account, where you can also select your own profile photo. Already have a PITNB account? Then sign in.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.