Comments on: Pete Wentz & Travis McCoy Debut New Art Show

By: Celeb Snax 10/12/08: MooMoo Releases A New Video… & More | Amy Grindhouse

Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:42:06 +0000

[...] ASSlee Simpson-Wentz first post-baby outing [Pink is the New Blog] [...]

By: Brianne

Brianne — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:20:42 +0000

I still think Ashlee looks miserable.

By: Panti Christ

Panti Christ — Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:59:32 +0000

meh

By: Stephanie

Stephanie — Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:00:53 +0000

I wish more people would draw attention to the invisible children movement.

Everyone should watch the film if they ever get the chance, its truly heartbreaking to see what these kids are forced to do/go through.

By: heather

heather — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:40:29 +0000

i like how ken paves was wearing his artsy hipster glasses

By: lizzy

lizzy — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:17:22 +0000

yeah, i can’t really say that i’m too impressed with their art. some of it is okay, but for the most part it’s just contrived.

By: what

what — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:05:15 +0000

The show should be called “how many art styles I can rip off and call them my own” OUCH! Hopefully the gallery owners are as embarrassed about the art and show as any respectable image maker is. Myself included.

By: Katt

Katt — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:19:21 +0000

where was ashley and pete’s new baby? i’m always confused how celebrity parents never seem to have any problem leaving their brand new newborn to go out. it took me months to go anywhere with out my baby……… just saying

By: pizzastains

pizzastains — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:53:52 +0000

WEAK. no artistry or creativity whatsoever. ive seen all these paintings before. my friends made them in high school. its jus recycled ideas and nothing new or spectacular

By: trish

trish — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:27:28 +0000

As far as Disney images… it’s appropriation so it’s totally legal and they don’t have to pay for the use of their images. BUT… if this is the new direction of art in America I’m moving. The only reason they got gallery space and the pieces are selling is because they’re famous.

By: nicole

nicole — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:50:28 +0000

i dont think the art is all that bad..some of its pretty good

By: Diana

Diana — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:34:01 +0000

Meh. I’m sure it’s different when you see it in person. Lol on the myspace comment Sarah.

By: rena

rena — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:32:04 +0000

wow, that is some really crappy poser shit. it’s too bad that real artists out there are struggling to make art and then you have shit like this that sells for thousands. it blows my mind. oh yeah, and what passionate graffiti artist calls it graf? makes me shake my head in digust, ah….

By: Sarah

Sarah — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:04:55 +0000

that is so myspace. oh god.

By: Cait

Cait — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:00:25 +0000

So I know I’m not very good at interpretting art–but what’s with all the Disney iconography ? Since they’re selling it, do you think they needed permission to use it in their art ? I mean it is trademarked. The one with Mickey saying I heart war (or something to that effect) was pretty disturbing.