Comments on: More Photos Of Jennifer Aniston In ‘GQ’ Magazine

By: Joel

Joel — Sun, 14 Dec 2008 04:46:44 +0000

Totally hot, but total desperate bitch. Is she always like that ?

By: Maylania

Maylania — Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:07:53 +0000

Though Jennifer is an attractive woman, she’s not very intelligent … this comes through loud and clear in any of her interviews. She’s not very articulate when she speaks. She comes across as a dumb blond. These semi-nude photos just prove how shallow she is as a person. I think she’s less private these days b/c John Mayer is rubbing off on her. He’s more of a public type of person, so I think he’s encouraging all of this nonsense as of late. As for Brad, he’s more well-suited to Angelina who is much less self-absorbed … so things worked out the way they were supposed to.

By: mel

mel — Sat, 13 Dec 2008 05:12:04 +0000

she’s so hot…

By: Ella

Ella — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:34:16 +0000

@Stephanie

Getting married isn’t like going steady. There is a reason it is such a big deal for many people. When two people get married that means they belong to each other and when someone else comes along, knowing full well that a man belongs to his wife, that person should respect the fact that they made those vows to each other no matter what her heart is telling her.
Persuing a married man is taking something that doesn’t belong to you.

Hopefully, you will never have to find that out what husband-stealing really means.

By: Chelsea

Chelsea — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:02:45 +0000

Love her! these pics are way over the top but she looks amazing! Don’t hate Angelina – Brad was the one that married Jen, he had the responsiblity not to break the vows!

By: WOW....

WOW.... — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:20:44 +0000

She’s still hot.
I love both Angie and Jen.
But, Jen looks AMAZING.

By: Stephanie

Stephanie — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:11:58 +0000

How can someone “steal” someone’s husband? Come on.

By: Ellen

Ellen — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:05:29 +0000

I cannot stand Angelina and couldn’t even before she showed her true home wrecking colors. She looks like she belongs barfoot and pregnant in a trailor in south Georgia. Jennifer has always maintained a level of class and control of herself and I love that about her. She was hysterical on Friends and in her movies. If you will notice, no other celebrity has anything bad to say about her. She seems like a real person. And honestly, if someone had stolen my husband I would be saying A LOT more about her. In fact, I’m pretty sure I would say them to her face. I think it is utterly ridiculous that she gets all this negative attention for being GORGEOUS and HAPPY in her own skin. I love her. She’s awesome and Angie needs to stay in France.

By: yyyyyyy

yyyyyyy — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:40:11 +0000

i like her less and less..

By: Jules

Jules — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:41:35 +0000

Ah…a lot of jealousy I’m reading! WISHING you had her body, fame, and fortune! If this is all Jennifer Anniston does for a little bit of attention, then good for her! At least she isn’t a homewrecking, husband stealing, psychopath that makes out with her brother, and daddy, and god knows who else for attention! You know that Angelina is only “adding to her brood” with all these kids for attention from none other than you all! Talk about desperate!

By: It's Trent, Bitch!

It's Trent, Bitch! — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:24:56 +0000

When, exactly, did I say anything different about Britney’s “desires to be left alone”? I feel immense compassion for Britney on many things but her celebrity, notsomuch.

By: BEE

BEE — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:53:22 +0000

I think she looks absoutely amazing! I hope I look like that when I’m in my 40′s!!

By: Jo

Jo — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:53:08 +0000

Good point Mandy. Britney was naked in the Womanizer video, yet complained about 30 cars parked outside of her house. Yet we all feel compassion for her desires to be left alone…why is it any different?

By: PITNBer

PITNBer — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:49:23 +0000

WHATEVER. You can tell interviewers (pre-sit down) which topics are absolutely off limits or ones that won’t be addressed if asked.

By: gokarm

gokarm — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:49:53 +0000

I honestly don’t mind the relationship the papparazzi have with their celebrity fixations but it SHOULD be heavily regulated. If the papparazzi were legally confined to certain streets and events, we’d still get our lohan/hilton, richie fix, but people like Aniston who clearly don’t want the negative attention will have an easier time staying away from it.
Oh, and about the nudity, the woman is 40 and has every right to be friggin’ proud of that body of hers. Again, the photo shoot was HER choice and she had fun with it. Good for her. It’s too bad people can’t differentiate between intrusive papparazzi shots and an organized, professional photo shoot. There IS a difference. Good on ya’ Jen, keep it up!

By: claudia

claudia — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:45:21 +0000

why aren’t you being more empathetic? you come out sounding so not nice :(

By: Prudence

Prudence — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:36:26 +0000

I think she looks great and good for her for having the kind of body at 40 that she can pose for photos like this. Why is it that she’s getting all the flack but when Angelina does anything it’s all golden???
As for the paparazzi, there should be a stalking law put in place. Yes they are public figures but there are limits to what people should be allowed to do when trying to get a photograph. These people like X17 and others are no better than bounty hunters and should be charged before another celebrity (like Diana) dies in a horrific way being chased by these money hungry parasites. I would gladly support a bill that protects the celebrities and their families from being intruded on in their daily lives like this. I have no problem if they are being photographed, etc when they are on a press junket but other than that…leave them alone!!!!!

By: mandy

mandy — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:15:50 +0000

trent, arent u just being a lil biased? am not a fan of jen and neither britney’s. but when britney did the same, u do applaud her. what gives?

By: Katie

Katie — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:36:08 +0000

Scream for privacy/pose naked on an international magazine cover = narcissistic mental illness.

By: Annette

Annette — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:29:24 +0000

In the last pic with her sitting with the tie she looks like ashlee Simpson. Maybe a long lost sister? Too much photoshop?

By: Ella

Ella — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:49:25 +0000

J to tha da (Has a HUGE ego)

I wholeheartedly agree. Aside from Pink is the New Blog I don’t read any celeb magazines. You can really see how popular they’ve become and it is very telling about the state of our country.
People are reading these stories and picking sides like they are watching a soap opera and not seeing snippets of real peoples lives-snippets that are taken out of context and moments that they would rather forget and move on from.

Jen has been dealt a harsh blow, and it is unfair and so shocking and disheartening to see so many people feeding into what the media has turned her into yelling team Brangelina when they have both admitted to at least an emotional affair while Pitt was still married. How is she the bad guy? How is going on with her career as she sees fit desperate and why does her career have to be compared to Angelina’s as though that makes what Angelina did okay?

It wasn’t a marriage on television. These two people vowed forever and Aniston got her heart broken in the worst possible way in the public eye which has to be worse-especially now with Pitt and Jolie saying they fell in love on set with Aniston none the wiser. And people want to call her desperate because she is doing something that hundreds of starlets including Angelina have done before her. And she has stripped down to her skivvies before. This is not the first time. It really makes me sad and kind of sick.

People are quick to shrug their shoulders when an actor or actress complains about the paparazzi when the fact of the matter is they did not sign up for the explosion of this particular branch of the media industry. It has not always been like this. Like Jen said she missed the days of paps hiding in the bushes. What about Princess Diana? She never did a spread for Maxim or GQ and she was hounded until the day that she died. Did she sign up for that?

Money and glamour are not a fair trade off when you can’t go to the grocery store with your child without twenty cameras following and crowding around you. No wonder Britney went nuts. I would too. It’s simply too much pressure and too many naive readers who allow it to continue. It’s simply supply and demand.

By: April

April — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 05:55:51 +0000

Jen looks pretty but I don’t get why she did this type of photoshoot. But like people wrote on here, I think she’s just enjoying the shape she is in and is at a point that it’s like “d*mned if I do, d*mned if I don’t”…which is unfortunately where our sweetheart seems to be in the media..people complained she was depressed or whatever when she wouldn’t open up about Brad’s cheating self and when she does speak up (in the mildest of ways..”uncool” is not really like fighting words) she is now “desperate” and not moving on. WHATEVER. Brad and Angelina are the ones who should be getting punishment from the media, not Jen..she was the victim in that relationship and somehow it’s Brad and Angelina who came out unscathed. Insane. I think Angelina is a manipulative punk who’s image she keeps trying to maintain even though it’s all crafted and she’s still a sly and coniving person (think like a SNAKE)..she seems incredibly capable of pulling wool over a lot of people’s eyes..because that’s what she’s done to have so many fans of her and Brad. I will never like those losers! I think Jen is moving on but people/interviewers never stop asking her about Brad/Angelina and she’s finally answering a little (after YEARS of silence!) and it’s more than some people can handle…whatever….. Jen, keep doing your thing! I don’t think a photoshoot like this was necessary.. but to each their own…she must just want to bask and live for the day and enjoy her skin while she’s looking her best..

By: J to tha da (Has a HUGE ego)

J to tha da (Has a HUGE ego) — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 05:08:10 +0000

@ Ella

I really think it says something about the state of our country when you are suppose to just “get over” the collapse of your marriage. They got married and were in love. Maybe the marriage was falling apart, but it’s a MARRIAGE. You are vowing to be together forever, and some people take those vows seriously. It’s not like Angelina stole her prom date. So honestly she has every right to be angry, and hurt over it.
I also guarantee that even if Jen did fall head over heels for someone else, and got remarried the headlines would read “Jen’s Revenge: How Finding Love Helped her Stick it to Brangelina One Last Time.” It’s amazing to me how easily we believe everything we read in the tabs. i remember the days when people took tabloids with a grain of sand.

By: Lula

Lula — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:59:18 +0000

If she would stop taking the bait and answering the questions, eventually they would stop asking. Just say that it is none of their business and move on.

Problem is, given her lack of versatile talent (sorry, but it is true) and hit movies, commenting on her ex, dating John Mayer, and these new nud-ish pics are, unfortch, the only things keeping the public’s attention.

I also agree with numerous posters- regardless of how great her body looks, these pics seem forced and desperate. Try coming out with a buzz-worthy acting performance instead.

By: Ella

Ella — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:04:41 +0000

J to tha da (Has a HUGE ego) Says:

And I’m probably going to get crap for this, but saying that a celebrity doing a sexy photoshoot in a mag is asking the paps to follow her is like saying a girl is a short skirt wants to get sexually assaulted.

Thank you! I couldn’t have said it better myself!!!
I agree with your entire post