Jennifer Aniston’s Walk Of Shame, Part Deux
After a second night in a row of public cavorting with one another, Mayerston apparently spent a second blissful night together Friday at John Mayer’s NYC pad … as a result, Jen got caught making a second walk of shame as she left his abode the day after. Just like the first time she got snapped doing the walk of shame, she hid her face from view … but this time she didn’t do so quite as ridiculously:
Contrary to what folks think, I am very supportive of this relationship between Jen and John. Since they started hooking up earlier this year in Florida, Jen has been more open and, arguably, happier than I think we’ve seen her in many years. I honestly think it’s helped with her career that she’s been so happily attached to John Mayer seeing that folks were getting a bit tired of seeing her as sad and lonely Jen — it looks much better for her to attend huge, splashy movie premieres with a guy on her arm. Even tho I poke fun at her walks of shame, I say You go girl! I’m really hoping for babies next … I’m sure some may object but I think a Mayerston baby would be so fun. Imagine the questions that might be asked of Brangelina. I think they could stand to get a bit of the treatment that Jen’s been receiving when she’s always asked about them. Mayerston, baby, 2009 … make it happen, please.
[Photo credit: Splash News]
Tags: Jennifer Aniston
RSS
Feedburner
December 21st, 2008 at 9:37 am
A Mayer baby would be so cutte. But I don’t agree with the “walk of shame” words, because they’re already living together in LA, so the term it’s not that proper.
December 21st, 2008 at 10:49 am
Watch it, Trent. Babies are NOT an accessory or payback.
December 21st, 2008 at 11:06 am
Walk of shame means that you just hooked up with some random person at a club…………..NOT someone you are in a relationship with. These posts are really annoying. ITS NOT A WALK OF SHAME!!!!!!!!!!! THEY ARE DATING!!!!
December 21st, 2008 at 11:17 am
@Katy — Walk of Shame – “People undertaking the walk of shame are understood to have spent the night at the house, apartment, or dorm of a sexual partner (or perceived sexual partner), particularly a one night stand.” Particularly but not necessarily
December 21st, 2008 at 11:28 am
Nope, I beg to differ w/you Trent. I don’t like this combo at all. Something is off w/him. I think he’s only in it for the publicity and she’s in it for a sperm donor. The fact they like each other is just an ancillary benefit.
December 21st, 2008 at 12:12 pm
So is it a one night stand if YOU are leaving your boyfriend’s house the next morning? Or if he is leaving yours?
December 21st, 2008 at 12:15 pm
@Defensive — no, it’s not a one night stand. but the trek home the day after a booty call is still the walk of shame.
December 21st, 2008 at 12:39 pm
<33 Mayerston!
Trent I totally agree with you, we need a Mayerston baby for 2009, that would be so cute.
December 21st, 2008 at 1:04 pm
According to a rag down here in Australia (New Idea), Brangelina have already organized their latest adoption of a little girl. The mag only comes out this morning so I don’t know the full story, but I get a headline email each week. It’s probably crap, but that’s the blaring headlines folks. lol
December 21st, 2008 at 1:07 pm
I would so love sh finally got pregnant and to end her boring carrier as well her boring life!
December 21st, 2008 at 1:25 pm
Booty call? Walk of shame? I’m sorry, but I don’t think these are the best words to be used when talking about 2 people dating since almost a year ago and living together. Just my take.
December 21st, 2008 at 1:26 pm
Oh, and I think they’re adorable together.
December 21st, 2008 at 1:31 pm
I think Mayerston babies would be gorgeous!! Especially if they had a little girl!! (It’d be funny if Mayerston kids hooked up with the Brangelina kids).
December 21st, 2008 at 1:52 pm
A mayerston baby would be awesome! I hope it all works out for her.
December 21st, 2008 at 2:09 pm
nothing shameful about leaving your man’s place in the morning. i love the way you like to stir the pot, trent.
December 21st, 2008 at 2:59 pm
Brad has NOT talked about Jen once while promoting Benjamin Button. NOT ONE word about her! He talks about Angelina and the kids. Angelina didn’t talk about her either while promoting Changeling.
While Jen has mentioned them in vogue, GQ, EW, Oprah! Going as far as mentioning their kids names.
Now Jen should request for the interviewer to not ask her about them in advance, like maybe Brad does .Because he has moved on after FOUR years, unlike Jen who won’t stop talking about them!
Also why would Jen go back to Mayer after he bragged to the press about dumping her? Their babies would get her chin, which would not be cute
December 21st, 2008 at 3:02 pm
Maybe Brad doesn’t get asked about Jen because he tells the interviewer not to ask those kinds of questions!
Why would Brad want to talk about his ex-wife from Four years ago, when he has much more important things in his life like Angelina and the kids.
December 21st, 2008 at 3:42 pm
@…. & 1213, I agree!! Jennifer is totally perpetuating the public’s “poor Jen” image by constantly bringing them up. Brad & Angelina don’t do it, because they don’t have to–they have actual talent to rely on and make interesting movies to plug. If Brad doesn’t get asked questions about Jennifer because he tells the interviewer not to, then Jennifer could do the same…and if they continue to ask, she can have her agent/manager/publicist/whomever ask the interviewer to leave.
December 21st, 2008 at 3:50 pm
what’s so wrong with being single? good lord.
December 21st, 2008 at 4:09 pm
Um… why would the press ask Brad and Angelina questions about a possible Aniston pregnancy? They haven’t asked Angelina about Billy Bob Thornton’s having a baby with his girlfriend after he surrendered rights to Maddox. And they haven’t asked her about Jonny Lee Miller’s new baby either. And the press never asked Brad about Gwyneth’s kids.
Just because Aniston insinuated herself into the Brangelina baby-making by crying in front of a Vanity Fair reporter when she floated that concept in Aniston’s face doesn’t mean that exes’ baby plans can and should be the centerpiece of a flipping interview. Whether Aniston’s tears were real or tactical (more than likely tactical), it backfired on her big time. Don’t pin any of that crap on Brad and Angelina.
Now… when are you going to count down your list of the best Golden Girl episodes?
December 21st, 2008 at 5:15 pm
Together or not when you leave someone’s house wearing the same clothes you walked in wearing the night before it’s THE WALK OF SHAME!!! Don’t act like you haven’t been there… anyway I agree with them having a baby of their own… Jen has said for years that she wants kids and I’m seriously getting annoyed with every news outlet and magazine questioning her on her exes inability to keep it in his pants/ not go on a baby finding vacation. Seriously who cares how many kids they end up having, although a few more and they’re gonna give those Dougars with the 18 a run for their money!! You go Jen, do your thing girl!!
December 21st, 2008 at 11:26 pm
[...] Jennifer Aniston’s Walk Of Shame, Part Deux… (Pink is the new … – barack obama britney spears celebrity gossip christmas cock engadget entertainment film gadgets gay marriage google hiv holidays hollywood inauguration invocation lesbian love madonna marriage marriage equality money music obama pastor … [...]
December 22nd, 2008 at 3:28 pm
@ piper, with a low and …..
I don’t understand how people make Jen out to be the bad guy when Brad and Angelina have made it obvious that they had a relationship that was inappropriate considering Brad was married at the time.
Jen’s the one who was jilted and while ‘no comment’ would be preferable to what she has been saying, it has to suck to have your ex-husband and the woman he cheated on you with splashed across every newspaper and magazine with the world singing their praises like they are some type of gods.
So she isn’t taking it well. So after four years she wants to talk about it. So what? She thought she was going to be with Brad forever and he broke it off with her. Of course he has moved on first, he moved on on the set of Mr and Mrs Smith.
December 23rd, 2008 at 8:00 am
I used to like her before any of this started. I dont think what Brad and Angie did was right , but it has been 4 yrs she needs to stop crying about it and until she lets go she will never really be able to move on
January 6th, 2009 at 1:08 am
You people are insane. AJ talked about Jen when promoting the Good Shepard and Brad talked about Jen when promoting Jesse James. You act like Jen brought them up. She didn’t she was aked about Jolie’s admition (after years of lying) that her rpmantic relationship with Pitt began on the set of MAMS while he was married to Jen. And she foolishly did right before Jen had her own movie to promote and could be aske about it. The truth is whether you like it or not, AJ and BP can not talk about that time without raising the issue of Brad being married because he was married. To Jennifer. When they talk about falling in lust, I mean love on the set of MAMS they bring Jen into tht mix and they don’t have to say her name. Are you saying that they are so stupid that they don’t know that? Please, BP and AJ know this full well and they use the triangle to get attention to.