Comments on: The ‘Pregnant Man’ Is Having Another Baby

By: James

James — Wed, 20 May 2009 04:04:47 +0000

The problem isn’t that yet another gay woman has goten pregnant, it’s that she and her supporters are claiming that a “man” got pregnant.

SHE has a uterus.

SHE does not have gonads

SHE did not contribute the sperm.

She and her supporters are simply promulgating a fraud, in order to forward a political agenda.

And that is the problem. A very large problem, especially since the media is colluding in the deception.

For all of you who think that just because someone thinks of themselves as a man or a woman MAKES them a man or a woman are deceiving yourselves. Surely you don’t believe that you’re deceiving the rest of us.

I first heard of this on a deceptive TV show on DHC. It was obvious from her first spoken word and from viewing HER face that SHE is, was, and always will be a WOMAN, no matter how much surgery she gets, nor how many male hormone she steals, nor how many sperm she procures. A transgendered female is still a female, regardless of their desire for an alternate reality.

So please, if it makes you happy, continue to deceive yourselves. Psychotics often do this. But don’t think for a moment that you’ll convince the rest of us.You really think that media validation is equivalent to reality? lol.get a clue.

By: Kayla

Kayla — Sat, 15 Nov 2008 06:17:25 +0000

Thank you, make me smile, you said exactly what I wanted to but I couldn’t figure out how to word it.

By: make me smile

make me smile — Sat, 15 Nov 2008 04:39:45 +0000

The number of people that take offence to this person being labelled as a man scares me. He identifies as a man, therefore he is a man. Gender is psychological, sex is biological. And sex is not even as cut and dried as many people seem to think. Not every baby is born as either male or female; they can be born with ambiguous genitalia, appear outwardly as one sex but have internal organs of the opposite sex, or physically appear as one sex but psychologically identify as the opposite. There are many many many variations of human sex characteristics. Maybe the real problem is that society has such a narrow view of gender and sex; there aren’t enough options for people that don’t fit the mold.

By: christi

christi — Sat, 15 Nov 2008 04:18:37 +0000

Seems like a story out of the National Enquirer that came true.

By: I Am Correct...

I Am Correct... — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:26:28 +0000

Guys…SHE is not a man…SHE can only get pregnant as a woman…this is ridiculous…its one thing to have a child in this unusual way but its another thing to parade this in the media and still trying to portray yourself as this “normal” family. This is so not kosher.

By: E

Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:24:45 +0000

trent…i can’t believe you are commending these people for be sick in the head. a “man” having a child!!!! those poor kids are screwed up for life. as for the staying out of the spotlight comment, have you not seen the articles, pictures, interviews, etc that went on for months and months now suddenly are back after the birth to announce they are havingh yet another child in this sick twisted situation! expect many more invterviews, pictures and magazine covers as these people are only doing this for the MONEY!!! hello!!!!! how stuipd are people!!!

By: DJWhoop

DJWhoop — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:22:13 +0000

Not a man. But good luck anyway!

By: vaquera

vaquera — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:40:49 +0000

I have absolutely no problem with these two having children. More power to them.
What I DO have a huge problem with is the way they are whoring themselves out to the media. That’s probably why they’re having another baby so soon- the money stopped coming in. I’m sure there’s already a book deal in the works too.

By: lou

lou — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 03:21:32 +0000

I agree with Joanne. He is transgendered – a person who was born female, now living their life out as a man. I think it’s kind of rare for someone who is taking male hormones to actually WANT to carry and give birth to a baby. It’s a pretty unique story. It is confusing but at the same time, it challenges me to think outside of these constructs and labels we are so rigid about. They look happy. The baby is beautiful and healthy. They’re doing something right. I worry more about the Jolie-Pitts children constantly being chased by the Paps, parents moving them all over the place, different people in and out of their lives. I bet you their lives are going to be a lot harder!

By: pooneck

pooneck — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 02:12:48 +0000

not healthy to have babies so close together for any woman or person capable of having children. they should have waited two years and then done it again. but oh well. good for them if this is what they want. best of luck to them all. they look very happy and the baby is adorable.