Comments on: The ‘Pregnant Man’ Is Having Another Baby

By: James

James — Wed, 20 May 2009 04:04:47 +0000

The problem isn’t that yet another gay woman has goten pregnant, it’s that she and her supporters are claiming that a “man” got pregnant.

SHE has a uterus.

SHE does not have gonads

SHE did not contribute the sperm.

She and her supporters are simply promulgating a fraud, in order to forward a political agenda.

And that is the problem. A very large problem, especially since the media is colluding in the deception.

For all of you who think that just because someone thinks of themselves as a man or a woman MAKES them a man or a woman are deceiving yourselves. Surely you don’t believe that you’re deceiving the rest of us.

I first heard of this on a deceptive TV show on DHC. It was obvious from her first spoken word and from viewing HER face that SHE is, was, and always will be a WOMAN, no matter how much surgery she gets, nor how many male hormone she steals, nor how many sperm she procures. A transgendered female is still a female, regardless of their desire for an alternate reality.

So please, if it makes you happy, continue to deceive yourselves. Psychotics often do this. But don’t think for a moment that you’ll convince the rest of us.You really think that media validation is equivalent to reality? lol.get a clue.

By: Kayla

Kayla — Sat, 15 Nov 2008 06:17:25 +0000

Thank you, make me smile, you said exactly what I wanted to but I couldn’t figure out how to word it.

By: make me smile

make me smile — Sat, 15 Nov 2008 04:39:45 +0000

The number of people that take offence to this person being labelled as a man scares me. He identifies as a man, therefore he is a man. Gender is psychological, sex is biological. And sex is not even as cut and dried as many people seem to think. Not every baby is born as either male or female; they can be born with ambiguous genitalia, appear outwardly as one sex but have internal organs of the opposite sex, or physically appear as one sex but psychologically identify as the opposite. There are many many many variations of human sex characteristics. Maybe the real problem is that society has such a narrow view of gender and sex; there aren’t enough options for people that don’t fit the mold.

By: christi

christi — Sat, 15 Nov 2008 04:18:37 +0000

Seems like a story out of the National Enquirer that came true.

By: I Am Correct...

I Am Correct... — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:26:28 +0000

Guys…SHE is not a man…SHE can only get pregnant as a woman…this is ridiculous…its one thing to have a child in this unusual way but its another thing to parade this in the media and still trying to portray yourself as this “normal” family. This is so not kosher.

By: E

Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:24:45 +0000

trent…i can’t believe you are commending these people for be sick in the head. a “man” having a child!!!! those poor kids are screwed up for life. as for the staying out of the spotlight comment, have you not seen the articles, pictures, interviews, etc that went on for months and months now suddenly are back after the birth to announce they are havingh yet another child in this sick twisted situation! expect many more invterviews, pictures and magazine covers as these people are only doing this for the MONEY!!! hello!!!!! how stuipd are people!!!

By: DJWhoop

DJWhoop — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:22:13 +0000

Not a man. But good luck anyway!

By: vaquera

vaquera — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:40:49 +0000

I have absolutely no problem with these two having children. More power to them.
What I DO have a huge problem with is the way they are whoring themselves out to the media. That’s probably why they’re having another baby so soon- the money stopped coming in. I’m sure there’s already a book deal in the works too.

By: lou

lou — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 03:21:32 +0000

I agree with Joanne. He is transgendered – a person who was born female, now living their life out as a man. I think it’s kind of rare for someone who is taking male hormones to actually WANT to carry and give birth to a baby. It’s a pretty unique story. It is confusing but at the same time, it challenges me to think outside of these constructs and labels we are so rigid about. They look happy. The baby is beautiful and healthy. They’re doing something right. I worry more about the Jolie-Pitts children constantly being chased by the Paps, parents moving them all over the place, different people in and out of their lives. I bet you their lives are going to be a lot harder!

By: pooneck

pooneck — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 02:12:48 +0000

not healthy to have babies so close together for any woman or person capable of having children. they should have waited two years and then done it again. but oh well. good for them if this is what they want. best of luck to them all. they look very happy and the baby is adorable.

By: Joanne

Joanne — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:42:17 +0000

This story would not be such a big deal if the media would just stop headlining every story about these people with ‘pregnant man’. I blame OPRAH!! She introduced them on the show by saying “a man is pregnant” (and of course the audience gasped). Instead of just EXPLAINING the issue of transgendered people (to an ignorant public), she exploited this story and set the tone for the way the media talks about this.

By: Wow

Wow — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:08:26 +0000

Gross…

By: megan

megan — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:46:22 +0000

I find this truly disgusting and that’s all I’m going to say.

By: Karen

Karen — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:33:57 +0000

To Crystal: I do realize that Jamie Lynn is 17 years old. That is why I put aside from the age comment. People also gave crap to Britney and a lot of other people who give birth so soon after have a child. I was just commenting because people were saying it was because Jamie Lynn was stupid and young that she was having another kid so close to the birth of her other child. What about the Beaties? They aren’t young and they needed IVF to get pregnant so it could not have been a ‘mistake.’ There are studies that show it healthy for mom or baby to have kids so close together. BTW I didn’t say that I supported Jamie Lynn Spears or young unmarried teenagers getting pregnant.

By: debho

debho — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:58:15 +0000

I agree with you Lady J. These kids are going to cop it when they get to school. Even though the times are a-changing, albeit slowly, people will always talk and ridicule and I think these little kids are really going to have to have thick skins later on in life.
I also believe you can’t have it both ways. If you want to be a man, then be one. Get rid of all of the female bits you’ve obviously hated. You can’t be both man and woman. Just my opinion.

By: Jeffrey

Jeffrey — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:34:42 +0000

STOP calling her a man. It is a chick with a ‘stache.

By: Crystal

Crystal — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:16:22 +0000

Karen, do you not realize that Jamie Lynn is 17 years old?! Of course everyone was givng her flack about possibly being preggs again!! This couple is married and stable and evidently full of love so why shouldn’t they grow their family while they have the chance?! Yeah, lets give support to a 17 unmarried, immature CHILD having her second child. UGH.

By: Frisa

Frisa — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:50:13 +0000

A MAN DID NOT HAVE A BABY!! Just because SHE has facial hair and wants to be a man doesn’t make it so. If they truly wanted to live a normal life as man and wife then they wouldn’t be making a mockery of the birth of their child. They are just trying to make money off of their freak show!!

By: coco

coco — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:17:27 +0000

Thank you! Apology accepted :)

By: Brittany

Brittany — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:10:04 +0000

It’s NOT a man…a man can’t get pregnant. I am not sure why she is labeled as a ‘man’. If she can pop out kids, she’s a woman.

By: Janie

Janie — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:08:51 +0000

Um I don’t understand how these two can be legally married and other gay couples cannot…So if you grow a little facial hair, but keep your vagina, then it’s okay to marry another woman?

By: Matt

Matt — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:54:20 +0000

Sorry coco about the typo. I was just stirring the pot a little. I really don’t care either way about Prop 8 or who contributed or didn’t. I’m not getting married so it really has no effect on me.

By: Polo8

Polo8 — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:50:16 +0000

This moron is NOT a man. MEN cannot get pregnant – it is physiologicaly impossible. Men lack a uterus – at last check, it was a fairly important component of being pregnant. This is just another cry for attention from a sick person.

By: coco

coco — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:33:52 +0000

To Matt- #1, it is spelled MORMONS. #2- You clearly are ignorant if you are still Mormon bashing after the whole Prop 8 thing. The church itself did not spend a dime for Prop 8. They were also instructed NOT to give political opinions in church and to vote as they wanted. The people who voted their different ways and donated money out of their own pockets to fund different things did so on thier own accord. 2 words- Fact Check. It helps if its from legit sources, too, and not Perez Hilton.

Secondly, I think it is strange that they consider this a “man” when he still has a vagina and is able to give birth naturally. He is still genetically and physically male, even if he no longer has breasts and is on hormone therapy, he is not a male yet. It perplexes me. Granted, I am happy that there are loving people in this world having children. I have no problem with him having kids (and yes, I am Mormon, in case anyone wanted to bash on us and our “beliefs”). I wish more loving couples, gay or straight, were raising kids, as I think its a major problem in society that kids are growing up without loving guidance. However, I do have a problem calling this person a man when he is not. At least not yet.

By: ashley

ashley — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:29:03 +0000

Regardless of who it is having the babies, I question the judgement of the doctor who agreed to IVF again this quickly after the 1st birth. They must have gone in for IVF 2 months after their little girl was born! The body needs more time to heal than that!