Nov 26, 2008
Angelina Jolie Pregnant Again?
'In Touch Weekly' reports

Could the Brangelina brood be about to expand again? According to In Touch Weekly magazine, yes! The mag is reporting as its coverstory this week that Ange is 3 months pregs with her 7th child. And while I don’t usually believe these sorts of reports right off the bat like this, I am reminded that In Touch was the mag that broke the news that she was pregs with her twins AND they were the mag that broke the news when she gave birth to those twins back on July 12th … could they be right again?


A U.S. magazine claims Angelina Jolie is three months pregnant with her seventh child. In Touch Weekly – which broke the news of Jolie’s second pregnancy with twins – is adamant that the actress is expecting another child in the new year. In an “exclusive” report the publication, which hits news stands tomorrow, states: “An excited Angie can’t stop talking about the new baby. So why doesn’t Brad seem thrilled?” Jolie and partner Brad Pitt’s spokesman has denied the reports, leading other U.S. outlets to rubbish the claims. However In Touch has consistently repeated the reports in recent weeks. Jolie and Pitt are already parents to three adopted children and three biological children, with twins Vivienne and Knox just four months old. In recent weeks Jolie has given countless interviews about her desire to expand their family even further. At the launch of the DVD for Kung Fu Panda last week she told reporters: “Anything could happen. We’re open to anything, we love kids and we’re having a great time. It’s chaos in our house, but it’s so much fun. We’ll definitely have more.” And she added that she couldn’t be happier with Pitt. “He’s the best daddy and we have fun, so whenever it gets hard we can just look at each other and find a way to laugh about and just appreciate that they’re only little once, and we should enjoy every minute.”

If this turns out to be true, I think it’s safe to assume that In Touch Weekly has a pretty reliable source possibly living inside Angelina Jolie‘s uterus … yeah, that or they have a great mole inside the Brangelina inner circle. Again, it remains to be seen if this report is true or not … but, even if it is not, In Touch has a pretty good track record when it comes to this sort of intimate reporting of Angelina‘s biological functions. What do y’all think … could Ange really be pregs again?

[Source]

Like PITNB on Facebook

32 Comments. Add Yours

1 2
  1. Bleeding Ears says:

    Oh for the love of all things Kentucky Fried Chicken! Why must they always have an inset picture of Jennifer Aniston accompanying any story with Brangelina?
    She once had a career, now it just consists of being an extra limb for those two. Sad.

  2. Rawad says:

    “In Touch Weekly has a pretty reliable source possibly living inside Angelina Jolie’s uterus”
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA, laugh of the day , love angelina , but Trent , your comment , i mean , LOL! :P

  3. LJ says:

    I don’t believe it…that means they were gettin’ busy a month after the twins were born. Seriously? Then again…. she had a cesarean and those lady parts don’t hurt down there so they could have been busy in the same week! But then how would they find the time?!

  4. Avi says:

    Another kid? I’d hate her for that. That’s just ridiculous. I am all for adopting and kids, but the line has to be drawn. She JUST had twins a few mos ago..how can they both concentrate on that many children? Plus, Brad is almost 45 which isn’t old, but it is for having kids, kind of. Can’t this woman let her va**na rest?

  5. Amber says:

    LJ, Are you kidding me?! Have you had a cesarean?! EVERYTHING hurts after one! Unless the woman is of course, Super Woman. Of course with Angelina, I’m starting to wonder….

  6. Liz says:

    Cesarean hurts more and takes longer to heal, but she is Lara Croft after all, so she might heal over night or something. hah.
    If it is true, they are both crazy!! They will just be as bad as the Duggar’s.

  7. nicole says:

    holy hell. i honestly hope not. she doesnt need anymore. call me a bitch and tell me im wrong all you want…but honestly she needs to stop.

  8. dawn says:

    I think In Touch just keeps saying she’s pregnant, and brad is leaving her, therefore IT occassionally gets it right… a broken clock is correct twice a day.

  9. Ani says:

    uh………………………………………………stop. having. kids.!

  10. las says:

    I am so over this couple – really sick of them.

  11. pw says:

    if she is pregs again i just have to wonder — do her and brad not use birth control or something? i mean, yeah, they’re rich up the wazoo but it doesn’t seem very responsible to add another one to the brood so soon after the twins — it seems like it’d be incredibly difficult already to make sure all the children have the proper love and attention they deserve.

  12. zahra says:

    i agree with las, i am sick to death of these two! and for the love of GOD please stop reproducing bradgelina =(!

  13. Noosiekins says:

    They need to stop having kids!!! I don’t care how rich and famous you are…

  14. piper, with a low says:

    Actually, In Touch reported that Angelina had twin girls, so no, they aren’t right all the time.

    And didn’t they just report that Angelina gave Brad his walking papers on September 11th, complete with a calendar, which tracked Brad’s movements in September ‘proving’ that something was afoot, besides Brad promoting Burn After Reading?

    Likely, In Touch’s change in tune had more to do with Angelina saying that Brad’s photographing her for W led to some frisky time between the two of them. Versus In Touch’s partyline that Angelina was depressed and self-conscious about her weight.

    As for the ministers of fertility on this board, worry about your own uterus and access to baby batter.

  15. Vaquera says:

    C-Section or vaginal birth, you’re supposed to wait at least 6 weeks to have sex again (at least that’s what I was told after both of my kids were born). I’m too tired to do the math, but it is highly possible she could be pregnant. After you’ve had one baby it seems like all you have to do is be in the same room with a guy and you’re knocked up again (unless, of course, you’re on birth control).

  16. Vaquera says:

    Oh, and could they PLEASE leave poor Jen out of it?? So f___ing tacky.

  17. Joanne says:

    Insanity!

  18. Jessica says:

    i have to kinda believe these beliefs when they’re so damn sure, just cause alot of times they have been true when you didn’t expect it. :) like for instance clay aken and his best friend having sa baby didn’t sound at all true but it was… :)

  19. Tammy says:

    For real……….they should do what they wnt! im a mother of five, and i dont believe im done. I just live for the experience!Im 37,and have been told i must be some kind of a superwoman myself.IF the world is sck of hearing about the two,then maybe the world should back off.did u ever stop to think how crazy we would all sound if we were under a constant microscope??i know i would.It is what it is!!!

  20. Summer says:

    I think it is awesome if she is! I love kids, and it looks like they do to. Besides they are doing it all is such a great way adopting and having bio kids. It is such a great experience and they have the money, why not have more. I am sure those kids get plenty of attention from the both of them, they seem very into the kids. Though I do think at some point it could get out of hand, and I agree with most of you leave Jennifer out of it, she has nothing to do with them and she seems to be doing just fine!

1 2

Leave a Reply

It's easier to leave comments when you register for an account, where you can also select your own profile photo. Already have a PITNB account? Then sign in.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.