Angelina Jolie Does ‘W’ Magazine
Angelina Jolie is featured on the cover and in the pages of the new issue of W magazine. Life & Style magazine reports that Angelina is photographed breast feeding one of her newborn twins in the mag … and, indeed, the cover photo appears to show Ange breast feeding. It’s unclear if there are any other intimately private photos of this nature inside the mag but I think the cover photo deffo makes a statement … check it out:
It’s true! Sources who’ve seen the photos confirm exclusively to Life & Style that Angelina Jolie really did pose for the cover story of W magazine while breast-feeding! “Angelina posed for Brad [Pitt] in one of the photos while breast-feeding,” the source reveals to Life & Style. “It’s really beautiful and tastefully done.” “The photos are amazing,” adds a second source. Brad shot the photos in mid-August at Chateau Miraval, the family’s home in the South of France. They’re scheduled to appear in W’s November issue, hitting newsstands on Oct. 21.
My guess is that this cover photo is prolly the only one to show Ange breast feeding but … who knows … it is the Art Issue after all, I guess we’ll find out soon enough. As for this cover photo, I personally think it’s really a beautiful shot. Very tasteful, very pretty. Angelina really looks like the portrait of motherhood. I quite like this photo. Thus far, no portions of the W interview (if there is one) have been disclosed and no other photos from the mag have come to light … but I’ll keep my eyes out. Since the mag boasts that they have “Brad’s Private Photos of Angelina Jolie” I am very curious to see them. What do y’all think of this cover photo? Is it too much?
Tags: Angelina Jolie, Life & Style Magazine, W Magazine
RSS
Feedburner
October 9th, 2008 at 11:01 am
gor.GOUS.
October 9th, 2008 at 11:05 am
Ahh, thats so much more natural than her ’smoldering’ red carpet pouting. I think it’s a beautiful shot :)
October 9th, 2008 at 11:08 am
Very very beautiful photo. Though, I’m sort of confused about Angelina and Brad and their track-record of allowing very intimate, sexual photos of them to be published. As a couple who’s so over-exposed in the media, you’d think they’d eschew something so private being printed in a magazine. Or maybe it’s their way of controlling the images of them being put out there. Or maybe they’re narcissistic and love the limelight. Hard to say.
October 9th, 2008 at 11:09 am
unbelievably great, brad should be a photog
October 9th, 2008 at 11:10 am
I think this is a beautiful photo. She looks so content, a perfect moment between happy partners. I hope I look that happy one day with my children
October 9th, 2008 at 11:11 am
Aweful shot for the cover. As “private” as that couple protests to be…why a breastfeeding shot? Sorry…I’m all for artistic expression…but this one escapes me.
October 9th, 2008 at 11:15 am
LOVE IT! So beautiful and peaceful. Motherhood is truly her best role of all.
October 9th, 2008 at 11:18 am
I love it! She looks peaceful and I love the little hand reaching up. Nursing moms and babies are my fav pictures!!
October 9th, 2008 at 11:21 am
Beautiful, absolutely beautiful. It’s a framer.
October 9th, 2008 at 11:22 am
I’ve never been a huge fan of Angelina Jolie but I love her more for this shot…she manages to be a gorgeous portrait of motherhood and a “lactivist” at the same time. :) As a mommy, I’m so happy to see prominent women like her being such a good example for breastfeeding.
October 9th, 2008 at 11:24 am
I looked at the picture first, before reading any of the article and didn’t even realize that she was breast feeding. Seriously, it’s not a big thing.
I love the photo – just simple and naturally beautiful
October 9th, 2008 at 11:25 am
I agree with Phillip and Margie:
It’s a framer that deserves to be kept private.
I wouldn’t be surprised if several groups get this banned off the supermarket shelves out of the eyes of babes. You really have to think before you act on something like this. Of course motherhood is beautiful, of course breast-feeding is very personal and intimate, but does the whole world need to witness the half-bare breast of Angelina on ever supermarket check-out line staring back at us? You can say “don’t look” all you want, but it’s a little hard not to when it’s so obvious to how it’s being displayed (tasteful or not).
October 9th, 2008 at 11:25 am
I think it’s beautiful. And why not breastfeeding? When you have a newborn baby/babies, that’s what you spend most of your time doing! Perhaps they want to show that the Hollywood stuff is a means to an end and this, their family life, is what’s most important to them.
Lexie, what sexual pictures have Brad and Angelina had published? Breastfeeding is * the* most natural thing between a mother and child and is in no way sexual.
October 9th, 2008 at 11:27 am
She looks great and is setting a wonderful example.
Anyone who has a problem with this is a moron.
October 9th, 2008 at 11:28 am
Oh yes, God forbid a woman be on the cover of a magazine with a partially bare breast nursing her child! She’s taking up valuable space that could’ve been used for showing half naked women spread eagle like on every single men’s magazine.
October 9th, 2008 at 11:29 am
I think it’s beautiful.
October 9th, 2008 at 11:30 am
Because someone else has an opinion that doesn’t match yours (Hatte and Melissa) doesn’t make them a moron. That’s why these are called “comments.” If you don’t like reading them because they don’t match your own views, then don’t.
October 9th, 2008 at 11:48 am
what’s the big deal if she’s baring her “half breast”…we’ve seen the whole thing in her movies. W mag isn’t even prominently displayed at the check out line, u’d probably find it in the magazine/books aisle. what’s the diff if u see a woman breast feeding her child in a mall food court or in a store? not a big deal.
October 9th, 2008 at 11:51 am
i feel that we see A LOT of half exposed breasts on the magazine racks at the checkout. The problem is that this cover isn’t so gratuitously oversexed it’s hard to pass it by.
October 9th, 2008 at 11:56 am
i didn’t like her mouth in the pic at first…but the more i look at it, the more i like the pic overall. she’s a gorgeous woman.
October 9th, 2008 at 11:59 am
it’s definitely the most beautiful shot of angelina i’ve ever seen. as a lactivist, i’m ALL for it. and, hopefully kids WILL see it. everyone should know that breastfeeding is natural and BEST for the health of our children.
October 9th, 2008 at 12:17 pm
As a breast-feeding mother I am so happy to see this on the cover of a magazine. It is not shameful or distasteful. Nursing is so healthy and such a great way to express your love for your baby. Shame on anyone who makes this into something bad.
October 9th, 2008 at 12:32 pm
Breastfeeding is not sexual. It will not offend children in a checkout line. It’s something that is wonderful and the best thing for a child. To breastfeed twins is so commendable. I’m very proud of W for putting this wonderful picture on the cover.
October 9th, 2008 at 12:33 pm
Angie, I never called you a moron or any other name.
I just find it interesting that we as a society are bombarded with sexual pictures and innuendo on a daily basis but a picture of a nursing mother sends people into a tailspin.
October 9th, 2008 at 12:35 pm
Being a newly breastfeeding mommy myself (my son was born 2 weeks after their twins), I fully applaud this photo. A lot of people make it very uncomfortable for women to nurse their children in public, when it’s the most natural form of feeding your child, as well as an inexplainable form of bonding. Hate to break it to ya, folks, but that’s what boobs were made for!!
October 9th, 2008 at 12:47 pm
Oh, please! There’s nothing dirty about this photo! You can see more boobage when she’s wearing certain dresses. Besides, it is indeed a lovely picture. What bugs me is that this beotch and half of the world act as if she was the first woman to have children and breastfeed them and love them. Nice picture, but for their family album… I’m not interested in having it in my house (so I’m not buying the mag).
October 9th, 2008 at 12:56 pm
I love, love this photo and I love seeing Angie through Brad Pitt’s eyes.
What a gorgeous photo…can’t wait to buy W when it comes out.
October 9th, 2008 at 1:04 pm
a mother feeding a babe – been done since the dawn of time – how could it be “too much”
October 9th, 2008 at 1:05 pm
Is it wrong to want her and Brad to go away for a while? I used to be obsessed with AJ, seriously. But it’s overexposure. Plus, this woman gives a lot of her money to foreign charities..that is GREAT, but what about the USA? Why not adopt an American child? Something I have never understood. I don’t hate her at all, or even dislike Angie, but I still think she seduced Brad when he was married to Jen.
October 9th, 2008 at 1:56 pm
Sure, breastfeeding is natural, non-sexual, and apparently healthy for the baby. It’s still not the kind of thing we need to see. Urinating and defecating are also perfectly normal, natural, and healthy, but I don’t want to see anyone doing those things on a magazine or in public, either. Certain actions are not morally wrong, yet they are not for everyone to witness, either. Angelina needs to learn some propriety.
October 9th, 2008 at 1:56 pm
Beautiful photo, she is a beautiful lady and brad is obviously good behind the camera, which brings up a strange juxtaposition: they want privacy, but he seems to enjoy art, creating it and showing it, and they as a couple seem so normal in a private way that I am sure it feels “normal” to them and a celebration of any mom breast feeding, but the public will always speculate. The picture in and of itself is great and why not breast feeding, it is just part of life.
October 9th, 2008 at 2:32 pm
Julie, are you honestly comparing breastfeeding to urination and defecation? I’ve heard a lot of crazy things before, but this one is a first. Maybe you have no children or did not breastfeed them, but what she is doing is providing the best nutrition and start in life for her children. How that can be compared to peeing or pooping is beyond me!!
October 9th, 2008 at 2:33 pm
It’s just breast feeding. She’s shown more in her younger years!! haha
October 9th, 2008 at 2:42 pm
Gorgeous pic, she looks lovely.
Julie, are you a mom? I don´t think so, at least you don’t sound like one. For those who say it is a private matter.. ummm, being a mom the first thing I realized was that my breasts just suddenly turned into milk dispensers and lost their usual sexual or erotic connotation or whatever you want to call it, at least until I stopped breast fedding. Friends, family, whoever happened to be passing by when my son was hungry knew what my boobies looked like. You cannot compare, CANNOT, breast feeding with defecating, what?? It is the most natural and beautiful thing in the world, feels great and does wonders for the kids. There are tons of people that feel uncomfortable when a mother breast feeds in public, I think that is absolutely moronic and I bet Freud could really digg into that and find some kind of mommy issue there.
I live in argentina and Im used to seeing boobies and butts displayed on every newstand, for real.. magazine after magazine all boobies and butts, this picture would be a breath of fresh air. If I’m going to see a boob I`d rather see a baby feeding from it.
Such a display of false moralism.
October 9th, 2008 at 3:09 pm
Pam…you’re right on! LMAO!!
October 9th, 2008 at 3:14 pm
This is an amazing shot! It’s not over the top at all….especially not when you consider that it could just as easily be Eva Longoria in a pewter chiffon top with freshly tweaked nipples and a sultry side glance. This is human intimacy in its purest form….and there’s an honesty to it that we never see on magazine covers.
October 9th, 2008 at 3:32 pm
Simple yet beautiful
October 9th, 2008 at 4:03 pm
Absolutely stunning. Just as mother and babies should be.
October 9th, 2008 at 4:18 pm
Just because something comes out of your body, doesn’t mean we all want to watch. No mommy issues here, just a sense of decency. I don’t have sex in front of photographers, either, because some things should be kept private. It’s not fair to call people “moronic” for not wanting to watch a woman breastfeed. Some people are more modest than others, and that should be respected.
October 9th, 2008 at 4:38 pm
I love it and think it’s beautiful. It’s nice to see such a normal moment from Hollywood’s power couple.
All that matters is that she and Brad are comfortable with it. Just like people shouldn’t be forced to do something they are uncomfortable with, I don’t think people should be prevented from doing something they are comfortable with just because someone might maybe sometime be offended by it.
October 9th, 2008 at 4:42 pm
Personally, I think she looks beautiful – simple and happy. It’s a great moment.
October 9th, 2008 at 4:51 pm
I love it. She’s such a mom. So beautiful. I can’t wait to see the other pictures.
October 9th, 2008 at 5:01 pm
Personally, I find pictures of celebs bottle feeding their newborns artificial baby milk FAR more offensive. Babies are supposed to drink human milk from their mother’s breasts. This photo is beautiful! Too much? Uh, no – that made me laugh, actually. There is nothing indecent about seeing a baby drinking breast milk from the source. There needs to be MORE of these kinds of normal photos as breast feeding obviously needs to be normalised in American society.
October 9th, 2008 at 5:03 pm
I completely understand julie’s argument, and I’m leaning more towards that breast-feeding is not something I want to see when I’m standing in line at a checkout.
However, at the same time, I respect the art work that is this photo and the beauty that accompanies it. And I don’t mind the photo, nor do I mind looking at it. If some lady in front of me were to whip it out to feed her newborn, I wouldn’t be so cool, but seeing this pic is okay :P
I don’t think AJ is particularly gorgeous, I actually find her rather unappealing, but I do think it is a lovely photo where she looks natural and like an actual person.
October 9th, 2008 at 5:21 pm
She looks beautiful as always but here, she looks very loving and it does seem like a private moment. You can almost feel the love coming from Brad too, looking into the lens into Angie and their baby. I’m thinking maybe Brad wanted us to see this woman that he loves as is, to repel the negativity that somehow finds it’s way to his family.
October 9th, 2008 at 5:22 pm
Julie, I dont think it’s moronic to feel uncomfortable but I do think it is to judge people becouse you feel ackward or feel it is not “decent”. I dont feel comfortable around spiders but I don’t think that people that like them are crazy, I wouldn’t make a sex tape but I don’t judge people who does, it is their choice, I don’t think it is indecent. Stealing, murdering, cheating, lying, war, hunger, raping, those are things that I condemn. I respect your modesty, I wouldnt try to change you into somebody that likes public displays of motherhood, but you should respect her choice as well if you also want some respect.
That “something” that comes out of your body it’s a miracle, the fact that we women can create life and even feed that little person only with the milk that your own body produces is a miracle, we should marvel instead of finding it indecent. I know that eventually, when you have a child, you will change your mind, until then just look at it as something you simple don’t understand or can’t empathize with.
October 9th, 2008 at 5:49 pm
She looks beautiful. I love the non-smile. She looks real, and I like that change from celebrity to real person. I think it’s nice to share pictures with us, and it does make them more in control. Breast feeding is a wonderful thing and should not be shunned :)
October 9th, 2008 at 5:50 pm
Oh, and I also disagree with Julie, you can have your opinions on breast feeding, but I think it’s too harsh to tie them in with (or compare) with urinating and poop!
October 9th, 2008 at 5:53 pm
Beautiful pic. She looks happy and content. If she were giving the child a bottle would anyone be saying how uncomfortable they are by the pic? If you know anything about breastfeeding (it’s one word, not two and there is no hyphen…FYI) you would know what a marvelous thing she is doing for herself and her children. Breastfeeding also reduces her chances of developing ovarian cancer, which is what killed her mother.
Google it…it’s completely true. I work in a hospital and I am a former Doula and Breastfeeding Educator!
October 9th, 2008 at 6:51 pm
I agree with “Hatte”. It’s both GORGEOUS, and sets a WONDERFUL example!
October 9th, 2008 at 7:24 pm
I think its retarded to see stars getting photographed doing things like breast-feeding!! Isn’t that bit private to share with millions of people??? These stars only think in terms of photo opportunities instead of private moments I guess……… But then they complain about not getting privacy…why the heck are you doing photographs including breast-feeding for the world to see???
October 9th, 2008 at 7:27 pm
Her lips are also frightening..
October 9th, 2008 at 7:31 pm
Are there two bigger publicity whores on the planet! These two seem to need public validation for every little thing in their lives. I believe they would sell their grandmother if it got them publicity!
October 9th, 2008 at 8:40 pm
So when the paparazzi start stalking them relentlessly to get more “intimate” shots, they really can’t complain. If they use their very private moments to publicise their movies, themselves than they certainly can’t get upset if the hounds of paparazzi hell are unleashed upon them.
Apart from that, she does look very pretty. Although the quality is quite grainey, slightly out of focus, it just appears off in that sense of quality.
October 9th, 2008 at 10:36 pm
I think it’s fantastic that this photo was published. America needs to be reminded that breastfeeding is natural (and healthy for the baby), and it should not be considered pornographic or “inappropriate” when it’s observed.
They’re just breasts people, approx 50% of the population has them!
October 9th, 2008 at 11:41 pm
What a beautiful photo! Her face is full of joy, contentment and love. I don’t know why it would be an issue for this photo to be on a magazine cover, she is hardly flashing her breasts in public. You see more on beaches, on covers of other magazines and out in public every day. She is doing what nature intended her to do, and hopefully this picture will encourage some mothers who were not planning to, to give breastfeeding a chance. I don’t think there is a better start to life that you can give to your child than to breastfeed, and if you disagree try googling it.
October 10th, 2008 at 12:18 am
While the pictures are nice, I’m sick of the both of them. They are being praised for what would be considered a form of child abuse. Children need stability. They are living a rockstar lifestyle with 6 kids under 12. thats ridiculous.
Brad can be a little black and white photographer all he wants, but continually praising them and saying how beautiful they are and how saint-like she is…its not right.
October 10th, 2008 at 3:47 am
I think that is the most beautiful shot I have seen of her, to show her breastfeeding her baby will encourage others to keep at it, especially feeding twins..she should be applauded!
October 10th, 2008 at 4:35 am
People are so silly about breastfeeding. Like, oh my god, she’s breastfeeding!! Hello… that’s what the boobies are for, ya’ll. Anywho, it is a gorgeous photo, best ever of her!
October 10th, 2008 at 6:01 am
BEAUTIFUL!
October 10th, 2008 at 7:27 am
[...] now you’ve probably seen it. The W Magazine cover with Angelina Jolie on it? Where she seems to be breastfeeding one of her 50 kids? She looks good. Obvi. It’s Angelina. [...]
October 10th, 2008 at 10:14 am
[...] :: Angelina Jolie photographed by Brad Pitt for W magazine PITNB [...]
October 10th, 2008 at 10:26 am
very beautiful photo
October 10th, 2008 at 1:36 pm
[...] Original post by It’s Trent, Bitch! [...]
October 10th, 2008 at 2:18 pm
After reading the responses already posted, there were so many comments were about whether or not the person was comfortable or thought the picture being on newsstands is appropriate. To those I say, don’t look at it then. If it offends you that much, you don’t have to purchase the magazine. There are so many other things that could be found offensive and to think one of those things is a woman feeding her child. That is all this picture is of, a woman feeding her child. If you are honestly going to say that you are tired of seeing or hearing about Brad or Angelina, get over yourselves. As a mother, and one who attempted to nurse but couldn’t, I find it refreshing to see a healthy, happy woman feeding her healthy, happy child. For all those who have to see something more than what is there, give it a rest.
October 10th, 2008 at 3:20 pm
Brad can come and take a photo of me breastfeeding any old time!!! :0
October 10th, 2008 at 4:07 pm
she’s really pretty here, and if they want to give us a picture to let us see them in a way their totally comfortable with then thats great.. and, there’s tones more nude pics than this one- if you weren’t told she was feeding you prolly wouldn’t have guessed? am i right?
October 10th, 2008 at 4:18 pm
A few things, first of all I LOVE this picture. I’m not exactly a fan of Brangelina, but with all the controversy in the world/media over breastfeeding, I think this is a wonderfully done picture to shed light onto the natural beauty of feeding your child, like many people have already said.
When it comes to the privacy factor, I’m sure many of you have seen the pictures of the paparazzi SWARMING celebs. Before they can get into/out of their cars or stores or wherever, the pap are ALL over them. So yes, that can be overwhelming. Especially when you want to go anywhere with your children. That can be very frightening for young kids. A picture like this one is merely doing it ON THEIR OWN TERMS. Better then sitting in your yard, feeding your children, and having the paparazzi swirling above in helicopters, perched in bushes, etc…. all to get an intimate picture. This was a better way.
And it really disturbs me when people are offended by breastfeeding. I have NEVER seen a mother in public showing her breasts while nursing. We mothers have a job to do, don’t particularly want others seeing our breasts, and understand others dont want to see them. That is why nursing mothers wear button-down shirts or use blankets and other objects to conceal the actual breast. This picture is conservative compared to 85% of newspaper stand covers. GET OVER IT.
October 10th, 2008 at 4:20 pm
The general American public needs to see more women breastfeeding. This is a natural phenomenon and is not a sexual act. Our babies are healthier and happier when they can bond with their mothers and get food made-to-order for them!! Go Angelina!!!!
October 10th, 2008 at 6:38 pm
LOL had to laugh at this comment
“I wouldn’t be surprised if several groups get this banned off the supermarket shelves out of the eyes of babes.”
Breasts are made to feed children. The vast majority of children have seen a boob before. It’s not pornography. Its beautiful. Much less offensive than someone bottle feeding :)
October 10th, 2008 at 7:10 pm
okay so here’s my take
If i were a teenager or any age for that matter, i would be horrified by the fact that my parents plastered baby pictures of me everywhere for the world to see. true, brangelina only sold the pictures to people but they’re everywhere, no kid would like that that. and THEN your dad goes and takes a picture of you, suckling at your mom’s breast and decides to sell it to W magazine, where its placed on the cover, for the world to see. i understand the money goes to charities. but really, aren’t their other ways of contributing to charities without publishing baby pictures? don’t you think it’s just a little too self indulgent? and tad creepy…
October 10th, 2008 at 7:58 pm
Wow, people… it’s a breast. Not a cunt, not a gun, not a crazy Austrian raping his daughter… it’s HALF A BREAST. Which is a hell of a lot less than what is shown on MTV… hell, even the Disney channel. Regardless of it’ “tastefulness” (because that is subjective to everyone), it’s a… say it with me… BREAST. It’s ok to call 90lbs celebrities a fat cow, it’s ok to show dying children in a commercial for some Christian fund, it’s ok to show innocent people killed on the news for the profit of some yahoo in the White House… but GOD FORBID you show HALF a boobie. Eep!
October 10th, 2008 at 8:28 pm
I am not sure what all the chatter is about. While I think it is not necessary and only precipitates controversy I don’t think it is distasteful. Personally I don’t want ot see it but wish that people wouldn’t get all up in arms and offedned. Media loves to feed the public drama and the public eats it up1
October 10th, 2008 at 9:29 pm
God, I bet you pathetic women droning on about the beauty of motherhood, blah, blah, blah, are all living in sexless marriages (or divorces) with a 5 year old in your bed and still on your tit.
October 10th, 2008 at 9:33 pm
As a photographer myself, I find this photo both beautiful and honest. I would much rather see the subtlety and intimacy in this candid shot than the typical posed shots captured by People, US and the like. Also, think about the women who will just pop out a breast in public to feed their children and no one says a word. At least in this picture, she’s partially covered and you see the tiny fingers of her pretty little baby. As for the poster named Mars: these two are not exactly publicity whores, as you so eloquently put it….EVERY dime they receive from magazine exclusives they donate to extremely worthwhile causes. Do your research before spouting idiocy.
October 10th, 2008 at 10:31 pm
Wow. Ashleigh. That is insane. Married w/children AND have breast fed both. Oh ya, and the sex is still great. You obviously have a disgustingly pittiful life yourself.
As for the bs with AJ showing her breast. It would be considered abuse to deprive your child of food. And when a baby is hungry, they are hungry and don’t give a shit who is around. Its a frickin breast. Who gives a rat’s ass? She is feeding her child, which is the responsible thing to do. If you don’t like it, then don’t look, and don’t buy this issue of the magazine. I just can’t believe how shallow and stupid people are. Would we be saying all of this if she had a bottle and was feeding her kid formula? Of course not. Double standards. Breast were created to feed… our society has sexualized them, and something as natural as breastfeeding should not be sexualized.
October 11th, 2008 at 1:00 am
Sorry – but I have issues with the word “tasteful’ being used around the subject of breastfeeding. Why do people always feel the need to emphasize that “oh – but it’s done tastfully” As opposed to what? Distasteful breastfeeding? Unless I see a woman breastfeeding whilst dancing on a pole – there is no such thing as distasteful breastfeeding! Good god … society is so messed up when it comes to breasts!
October 11th, 2008 at 7:26 am
To the person who wanted to know why AJ doesn’t adopt an American baby, it is outrageously difficult and time consuming, even for the very rich,to adopt an American baby. While, in other countries, babies by the thousands suffer neglect and separation anxiety and do not thrive because they are in orphanages that are barely staffed. So why fight for years with other Americans over an American baby when you can be a parent in half the time at half the cost to an orphaned little one who might never be parented or loved?
October 11th, 2008 at 8:53 am
To all of you who have criticized her for doing this I have 2 things to say: 1. Lexie, breastfeeding is NOT a sexual thing shared between the mother and the father. 2. Angie, it would be a grave injustice if this gets banned from supermarket shelves. This is a picture of a mother feeding her child. There are worse magazines that are always out in the open for my children to see when we’re shopping at Wal-Mart: Cosmo, Vouge, Elle, these have all had more questionable cover photos that children should not see and yes Lexie, those WERE sexual in nature!
October 11th, 2008 at 9:17 am
I agree with Victoria, Ashleigh you are quite rude. I am only 21 and I am breastfeeding my 3 month old who sleeps in his own crib unless I want to snuggle with him, am having incredible sex, and making my relationship work,and I really dont care what anybody thinks about breastfeeding. That is what breasts were made for and I personally think it is just rather selfish to not breastfeed. Sure it can be easier, but formula is not near as good as breastmilk. if you dont feel that motherhood is something special, well there is probably something screwed up with your brain chemistry, because it is only natural for MOST women to feel strong positive emotions about being a mother because if they didn’t it would mean the end of our society. If it weren’t for women being mother’s you wouldn’t be here.
October 11th, 2008 at 11:41 am
am i the only one who actually feels for angelina jolies kids? they are so over exploited, it’s so sad. and if angie really wants to help the world why doesn’t she donate her millions to people who have lost their homes and living in tent cities across america? why doesn’t W do a real cover story and stop turning brangelina into a couple of messiahs. exploiting your kids, and exploiting their privacy for money is wrong. even if the money goes to charity.. amd who knows how much of it does
October 11th, 2008 at 12:32 pm
Have to agree with all the others that breasfeeding is not sexual. Not only is it natural and beautiful, but kudos to her for breastfeeding twins. Lovely photograph.
October 13th, 2008 at 12:47 pm
Wow what a subject to bring out language that makes me wonder if English night classes are still taught as many of the bloggers need to brush up on it.
All of you that are talking about the children make me wonder just when did you care about those children? After they were born or while they were in the womb? That little hand was the hand of a child even before it was born. Your children were alive inside of you and I am so glad you chose to have children instead of murder them. The joy we feel while feeding, holding and watching them grow are never felt by many because they choose murder. I am not fond of either of the Pitts and certainly not fans but they have done good for a lot of people and that includes building homes for those that have none in the New Orleans area. Every one can say what they want about breast feeding but not everyone is able to breast feed no matter how much they want to.
Everyone has to answer for their choices someday. I decided when I was a child that someday I wanted to be a mother but would first fall in love and get married. Some of you need to go back and read your blogs and feel the anger that seeps from the words. That is down right stupid to get mad over something and someone that does not have anything to do with you at all. Cool it and send that energy elsewhere.
October 22nd, 2008 at 5:57 am
There are no the cover about it. You may choose to go out and buy sexual pictures that explain their way and even provide you with a wonderful example to learn from. It does this with no way to that happy one day while being affordable and easy to learn.