Comments on: Lindsay Lohan Says ‘No Thanks’ To ‘Playboy’ Magazine

By: Paz

Paz — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:02:58 +0000

Just because she takes her clothes off for one job doesn’t mean she has to take them off for everyone!
Besides, NY magazine and Playboy are two different audiences and have two different objectives.
I was surprised they only paid her 700,000.
I wonder how much they paid Kim Kardashian?

By: Wow

Wow — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 07:26:06 +0000

Her M.M. pictures were also ugly.

By: Joanne

Joanne — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 05:55:44 +0000

I’m with Lindsay – a girl must choose these things wisely! The M.M. pics were obviously a personal connection thing for her. I had no idea she was not paid. I think that says something about her. TRENT – just because a girl will pose nude in one situation does not mean it’s a free for all. You have to have trust in the photographer and publication that they will not manipulate the photos or story. It does not make Lindsay a hypocrite to agree to one and not the other.

By: Pam

Pam — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 00:06:32 +0000

For a million? Definitely will reconsider! Plus, it´s playboy! It is not Hustler…Who would turn it down? (Having the proper bod, right?)
Love you Trent, I read you every day.. Kisses from Argentina!

By: Ronald Clemons

Ronald Clemons — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 21:05:44 +0000

What is ” Lindsay Lohan “? Playboy is short for Playboy’s. This usually means you trade and exit in a very short period of Last Night s Party. The Monroe recreation is just that, you act because you already know what to do.

By: Nicola

Nicola — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:35:21 +0000

I applaud her for turning it down. She took the NY Mag shoot because it was artistic, and Monroe is her idol. She wasn’t paid for that either, which was really pleasing to here. I can’t stand women who take their clothes off for money. Playboy is a trash rag.

By: Tara

Tara — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:24:43 +0000

Aw she couldve done a Marilyn Monroe Playboy Tribute. ;)

By: LOVECarrie

LOVECarrie — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:08:29 +0000

Maybe Sam doesn’t want her to share the goods? ;)

By: Anna

Anna — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:15:01 +0000

I think the Monroe recreation was much more personal for her. The fact that they were printed anywhere doesn’t matter. I think the same goes for many, when I view the Monroe recreation, there is an essence of Marilyn left. I doubt she’s “no nudity” but I think she’s going to make a good choice and choose her nude times appropriately. Maybe we’ll start to take her more seriously if she did.