Comments on: Kevin Federline Secures Full Custody Of Kids

By: Makayla

Makayla — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:46:28 +0000

In buying goldfish as your pet, check if they have bright, clean and shiny scales. You don

By: Laura

Laura — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:51:36 +0000

You people need to realize that custody arangements are never permanent and can be changed until the children are 18. She is under a conservatorship and would not get custody if this thing went to trial. It would be a waste of time and money. This allows her to get healthy while still being a part of her kids lives. She can and will challenge the custody arrangement when she is well.

By: Joanne

Joanne — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 06:30:58 +0000

If this is true … it’s disturbing. Just because he did (WHAT FATHERS ARE SUPPOSED TO DO IN THE FIRST PLACE) which is take care of their spawn, does not mean he should get sole custody. Britney’s meltdown was actually only a brief period in time and the children are still only young. If Britney was your average broke mother, I believe he would have just walked away from the situation.

By: MontanaMama

MontanaMama — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 04:41:05 +0000

Well said Bree. I agree, Kevin’s not my kind of guy, but he really has handled this very very well. He has kept the grandparents involved & I’m guessing that Britney would still be spiraling out of control with Sam Lufti medicating her if Kevin hadn’t fought for custody – which was the wake up call. Her parents (ok father) wouldn’t have stepped in and stabilized her. Kevin has been extremely low profile through all of this and I’m impressed – let’s remember that Britney went to the press that he was sleeping with her mother and he didn’t do anything except handle it in court. His lawyer could take some lessons.

By: Jaddedkitten

Jaddedkitten — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 01:43:08 +0000

some ppl are so fucking stupid * and i’m not talking about britney i mean you, you fucking retards!

By: PixieBassline

PixieBassline — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 21:35:47 +0000

Bitch looks like she’s too stupid to even trust to keep a goldfish alive.

By: slugger

slugger — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:19:21 +0000

I still think neither of them are fit to be parents. Sister Mary Romano goes on a rant on celebrity prayer list!

By: Grace

Grace — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:05:23 +0000

Brit is not giving up if she doesn’t agree to what she got now they would go to trial and there is no way she would win it and once the court rule the case as final she wouldn’t be able to go to court for modification. This the best option for her now and she can go back to court any time to ask for modification. We don’t know what she was offered so we can judged on end product. She loves her kids, no woman would give her kids up for career. Cut the slut, give her a chance to recover

By: danielle

danielle — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:32:15 +0000

my theory is that britt just doesn’t want the kids anymore. they are now an inconvenience to her as she is trying to make her way back to the “top”
she’s pathetic.

By: Kristin

Kristin — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:30:24 +0000

Gigi, that was totally my thought as well. Britney prolly realized that she had kids too young and doesn’t want the responsibility of taking care of them 24/7. She can do what she wants whenever and only has to plan around them a few nights/days a week. Let’s face it, that is MUCH easier than being soley responsible. She wants the easy way out and that doesn’t surprise me in the least!

By: Linniker

Linniker — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:29:25 +0000

Hey,

Can anyone tell me whether the rumors that no more singles will be released from Blackout are true or not??

Britneyspearsblackout already reported it and so did wikipedia(final paragraph)

By: Nicola

Nicola — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:59:00 +0000

@GiGi…I’m thinking the same thing. Perhaps she thinks it’ll be ‘funner’ to visit them sometimes and not have to take care of them 24/7. I bet it’s the cheaper option too, that also lets her focus on her ‘career’.

IMO neither of those two deserve those poor boys. I feel so so sorry for them.

By: ginae

ginae — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:51:41 +0000

i agree with jane, bree & nicole.!

By: GiGi

GiGi — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:50:30 +0000

Maybe she doesn’t WANT her kids… nobody can picture that?

By: Nicole

Nicole — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:48:23 +0000

i can’t even hate on kevin, he stepped up when things got rough and became a good parent. he was the only parent those boys knew for awhile, and the kids seem to be doing just fine, i wouldnt mind seeing brit get more time with the kids, shes made major changes in her life. its hard to say who deserves what, when we only get what the media tells us.

By: Bree

Bree — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:47:53 +0000

Wow. Kevin has done nothing but PROVE that he had reason to be afraid for his children’s well-being because Britney REALLY WAS going off the deep end, NOT ONCE has asked for more money, spends most of his time at HOME with his children (yes, he occasionally parties, but I think every parent is entitled to an occasional get-away…and at least when he does it his kids are home, safe, instead of in the BACK SEAT like with Britney) and you people STILL won’t admit that he is a GOOD FATHER!!!! Britney is sick. She needed help and Kevin was smart enough to see that his children shouldn’t be in her home while she was acting that way. He seems to have tried to work with her EVERY STEP OF THE WAY and has NOT ONCE bashed her in public!! Way to go Kevin…you’ve proved yourself a true man.

By: Cosmo Guy

Cosmo Guy — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:47:20 +0000

I think this is pure bullshit but I think there might be a plan behind it all, on Britney’s part, which is good!
Cosmo Guy
http://www.cosmoguyonline.com

By: Jaddedkitten

Jaddedkitten — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:47:01 +0000

I don’t understand what everyone is so upset about about Kfed already had full custody of their boys and she was never going to get 50/50 while under a conservatorship and if she went to trail she could lose her vists and overnights with her boo boo’s i’m proud of her for choosing their needs over her own cause this is got to be killing her she really got to focus on getting better if she want’s to be the kinda of mother she should have been. But for right now her babies are with the one person who can really take care of them their NANNY cause you that who’s really looking after sean and JJ

By: bigmama

bigmama — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:42:22 +0000

Its sad news hopefully britneys lawyers have a hidden agenda underneath.
Hopefully this won’t affect britneys recovery. I’m a huge fan.

By: Jane

Jane — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:10:05 +0000

Britney is a Train-Wreck and should not have custody of a hampster in the current state she’s in. I’m sure her father saw the light and helped persuade her this was the best thing For The Children which is really what it’s all about. And who knows how bad K-Fed is as a dad. I’ve heard he’s quite attentive. At least he’s not flipping out every other day, flashiing his naked crotch to the paps and beinig carted off to a mental health facility. The Right parent got those poor kids.

By: Mr. Gyllenhaal

Mr. Gyllenhaal — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:06:10 +0000

WOW. K-FUCK only wants sole custody so he can get more money. I wonder how much she has to give that loser asshole of a dad. At least she still gets to see them and the case is as of now done! Team Brittany!!

By: Brown Loose

Brown Loose — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:59:42 +0000

1. She didn’t lose the custody battle. It is NOT PERMANENT.
2. Kaplan should SHUT THE FUCK UP.
3. Britney, I’m more than sure, will fight back when the conservatorship will be over in July (hopefully).
4. That unemployed “ecstatic” father of 4 must get a job and start be at least a quarter the man kaplan is portraiting him.

I support Britney, hope she’s alright. Laura knows what she’s doing.

The Spears FTW!

By: Tom

Tom — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:51:38 +0000

I can’t believe it. I mean: I understand it (I’m studying to be a lawyer myself) but from a personal view I can’t.

K-Fed is the least capable of caring of them! All he does is party and giving the kids to their nanny!