Also, it’s not really fair to compare the Bush’s to the royals, since they’re not really the same. The president is the political leader, while the British royals are symbolic leaders. While there’s absolutely nothing that requires presidential children to do anything for the country, it’s basically ingrained into royals from birth that their whole life revolves around serving their country. Good for Harry and Wills, their mother and father raised them right.

why is it that every time a topic like service by our own leaders comes out, the bush girls are brought up? obama is the one choosing to run as commander in chief and he hasn’t served. but no snarky comment on that. no pics of chelsea clinton heading to boot camp, but no comments about that.

the reality is less than 1% of the US population serves or has served in the military. my bro is just back from Iraq (thank God) and he’s said repeatedly military is not for everyone, what’s important is that everyone does something– paid or volunteer- to make their part of the world better.

now can we get back to nonsense like who Lindsey Lohan is sleeping with?